For those who have seen Harold Johnson - Ezzard Charles
Posted: 14 Feb 2008, 08:22
Who deserved the decision?
gran......Goldstein called that stoppage EXACTLY correctly....any more and your man would have been permanently damaged. Is that what you wanted for Harold? To be permanently injured?granberry wrote:The film is easily available.
Johnson (very young) never looked better.
His counter punches seemed to start almost before your punch began.
And every one was a KO punch.
Johnson was cut in the first round, which looked bad for him, but it didn't deter him.
Johnson hurt Charles a number of times with both right hand and left hook counters. Don Dunphy mentioned each time Johnson had Charles hurt. You could tell from Charles' reaction, immediately grabbing and holding on for a bit.
Charles was bigger than Johnson, much more experienced.
I think that was Johnson's best fight, along with his decision later over Eddie Machen ( who was number one/two heavyweight contender at the time and outweighed Johnson in basic bone structure by a good 20 pounds).
In comparison with Johnson, Charles was not as sharp in this fight. He may have underestimated Johnson, thinking Johnson was smaller and fairly young.
In the 2nd to last round Johnson touched a knee (bounced off it and back up) after a Charles punch. Dunphy said he thought it should have been called a knockdown but it wasn't.
Johnson's jab was a nightmare to face, and any punch you threw at him he was lying in wait with a vicious counter.
It is interesting that less than a year after losing this fight to Johnson, Charles gave Marciano a hard 15 round fight for the heavyweight title.
It is also interesting that less than a year after Johnson beat Archie Moore thoroughly for most of their title fight and knocked Moore flat on his face in the 10th round before Moore saved his title with a 14th round stoppage (with more than a little help from referee Ruby Goldstein),
Moore went on to give Marciano a good fight.
I would recommend getting this film to anyone interested in the highest level boxing.
Two of the best fighters in the same ring at the same time I have ever seen.
You mean like Goldstein handled the knockdown in the 10th round where he gave Moore standing counts after he was already up as if it was a non title fight,BoxBuzz wrote:gran......Goldstein called that stoppage EXACTLY correctly....any more and your man would have been permanently damaged. Is that what you wanted for Harold? To be permanently injured?granberry wrote:The film is easily available.
Johnson (very young) never looked better.
His counter punches seemed to start almost before your punch began.
And every one was a KO punch.
Johnson was cut in the first round, which looked bad for him, but it didn't deter him.
Johnson hurt Charles a number of times with both right hand and left hook counters. Don Dunphy mentioned each time Johnson had Charles hurt. You could tell from Charles' reaction, immediately grabbing and holding on for a bit.
Charles was bigger than Johnson, much more experienced.
I think that was Johnson's best fight, along with his decision later over Eddie Machen ( who was number one/two heavyweight contender at the time and outweighed Johnson in basic bone structure by a good 20 pounds).
In comparison with Johnson, Charles was not as sharp in this fight. He may have underestimated Johnson, thinking Johnson was smaller and fairly young.
In the 2nd to last round Johnson touched a knee (bounced off it and back up) after a Charles punch. Dunphy said he thought it should have been called a knockdown but it wasn't.
Johnson's jab was a nightmare to face, and any punch you threw at him he was lying in wait with a vicious counter.
It is interesting that less than a year after losing this fight to Johnson, Charles gave Marciano a hard 15 round fight for the heavyweight title.
It is also interesting that less than a year after Johnson beat Archie Moore thoroughly for most of their title fight and knocked Moore flat on his face in the 10th round before Moore saved his title with a 14th round stoppage (with more than a little help from referee Ruby Goldstein),
Moore went on to give Marciano a good fight.
I would recommend getting this film to anyone interested in the highest level boxing.
Two of the best fighters in the same ring at the same time I have ever seen.
granberry wrote:Marciano doesn't know as much about boxing as buzz,BoxBuzz wrote:gran......Goldstein called that stoppage EXACTLY correctly....any more and your man would have been permanently damaged. Is that what you wanted for Harold? To be permanently injured?granberry wrote:The film is easily available.
Johnson (very young) never looked better.
His counter punches seemed to start almost before your punch began.
And every one was a KO punch.
Johnson was cut in the first round, which looked bad for him, but it didn't deter him.
Johnson hurt Charles a number of times with both right hand and left hook counters. Don Dunphy mentioned each time Johnson had Charles hurt. You could tell from Charles' reaction, immediately grabbing and holding on for a bit.
Charles was bigger than Johnson, much more experienced.
I think that was Johnson's best fight, along with his decision later over Eddie Machen ( who was number one/two heavyweight contender at the time and outweighed Johnson in basic bone structure by a good 20 pounds).
In comparison with Johnson, Charles was not as sharp in this fight. He may have underestimated Johnson, thinking Johnson was smaller and fairly young.
In the 2nd to last round Johnson touched a knee (bounced off it and back up) after a Charles punch. Dunphy said he thought it should have been called a knockdown but it wasn't.
Johnson's jab was a nightmare to face, and any punch you threw at him he was lying in wait with a vicious counter.
It is interesting that less than a year after losing this fight to Johnson, Charles gave Marciano a hard 15 round fight for the heavyweight title.
It is also interesting that less than a year after Johnson beat Archie Moore thoroughly for most of their title fight and knocked Moore flat on his face in the 10th round before Moore saved his title with a 14th round stoppage (with more than a little help from referee Ruby Goldstein),
Moore went on to give Marciano a good fight.
I would recommend getting this film to anyone interested in the highest level boxing.
Two of the best fighters in the same ring at the same time I have ever seen.
The referee did his job well doing right by both men. Both highly skilled, both remarkable fighters. One fighter won the fight, the other walked away second best in a fairly refereed two man contest.granberry wrote:You mean like Goldstein handled the knockdown in the 10th round where he gave Moore standing counts after he was already up as if it was a non title fight,BoxBuzz wrote:gran......Goldstein called that stoppage EXACTLY correctly....any more and your man would have been permanently damaged. Is that what you wanted for Harold? To be permanently injured?granberry wrote:The film is easily available.
Johnson (very young) never looked better.
His counter punches seemed to start almost before your punch began.
And every one was a KO punch.
Johnson was cut in the first round, which looked bad for him, but it didn't deter him.
Johnson hurt Charles a number of times with both right hand and left hook counters. Don Dunphy mentioned each time Johnson had Charles hurt. You could tell from Charles' reaction, immediately grabbing and holding on for a bit.
Charles was bigger than Johnson, much more experienced.
I think that was Johnson's best fight, along with his decision later over Eddie Machen ( who was number one/two heavyweight contender at the time and outweighed Johnson in basic bone structure by a good 20 pounds).
In comparison with Johnson, Charles was not as sharp in this fight. He may have underestimated Johnson, thinking Johnson was smaller and fairly young.
In the 2nd to last round Johnson touched a knee (bounced off it and back up) after a Charles punch. Dunphy said he thought it should have been called a knockdown but it wasn't.
Johnson's jab was a nightmare to face, and any punch you threw at him he was lying in wait with a vicious counter.
It is interesting that less than a year after losing this fight to Johnson, Charles gave Marciano a hard 15 round fight for the heavyweight title.
It is also interesting that less than a year after Johnson beat Archie Moore thoroughly for most of their title fight and knocked Moore flat on his face in the 10th round before Moore saved his title with a 14th round stoppage (with more than a little help from referee Ruby Goldstein),
Moore went on to give Marciano a good fight.
I would recommend getting this film to anyone interested in the highest level boxing.
Two of the best fighters in the same ring at the same time I have ever seen.
enabling Moore to get away without Johnson being able to get off another punch at him before the bell rang.
Rocky Marciano is the commentator on the tape I have.
Of course Marciano doesn't know as much about boxing as buzz, but when the ref pulled that to save Moore's neck in the 10th round,
Marciano said, "Ooooh, the ref just cost Johnson a LOT of money."
If you had just been knocked flat on your face as Moore was there, you wouldn't want Harold Johnson coming at you to finish you off while you were still shakey.
Goldstein made sure that didn't happen.
It doesn't get any rawer than that.
buzz doesn't have a clue what boxing is.BoxBuzz wrote:The referee did his job well doing right by both men. Both highly skilled, both remarkable fighters. One fighter won the fight, the other walked away second best in a fairly refereed two man contest.granberry wrote:You mean like Goldstein handled the knockdown in the 10th round where he gave Moore standing counts after he was already up as if it was a non title fight,BoxBuzz wrote: gran......Goldstein called that stoppage EXACTLY correctly....any more and your man would have been permanently damaged. Is that what you wanted for Harold? To be permanently injured?
enabling Moore to get away without Johnson being able to get off another punch at him before the bell rang.
Rocky Marciano is the commentator on the tape I have.
Of course Marciano doesn't know as much about boxing as buzz, but when the ref pulled that to save Moore's neck in the 10th round,
Marciano said, "Ooooh, the ref just cost Johnson a LOT of money."
If you had just been knocked flat on your face as Moore was there, you wouldn't want Harold Johnson coming at you to finish you off while you were still shakey.
Goldstein made sure that didn't happen.
It doesn't get any rawer than that.
Period. End of story.
I'm sure if you reflect on this carefully even you will come to agree with me on this. Take your time, think about it in a fair and balanced manner.
I think you'll find I've got this one right.
USELESSBoxBuzz wrote:For our purposes I'm going with number 1. Now if you have been talking about 2, 3, or 4 all this time, then I apologize for not making myself clear in our past discussions.
1. the act, technique, or profession of fighting with the fists, with or without boxing gloves.
2. the material used to make boxes or casings.
3. a boxlike enclosure; casing.
4. an act or instance of putting into or furnishing with a box.
BB, look forward to it...BrocktonBlockbuster49 wrote:I disagree with the comments so far. Charles and Johnson looked spectacular in this fight, both very fluid with incredible boxing skills and ring trickery. Charles won the fight hands down. He outboxed and outhinked johnson and knocked johnson down in round 10. I scored the fight 6 rounds to 3 with 1 even in favor of ezz charles.
Ezzard was robbed in this fight Ill get back to you on my round by round