Page 1 of 1
Malignaggi Questions to be answered..
Posted: 02 Mar 2008, 16:24
by DG.
Do you guys have any questions to put to Paulie Malignaggi?
I have posted my questions geared towards WITTER.
Here is the thread - pop over and ask some questions.
http://forums.doghouseboxing.com/index. ... try2652321
Maybe ADD YOUR QUESTIONS TO THE BOTTOM OF EACH POST AND I WILL PRESENT THEM ON YOUR BEHALF???
We can lost this as the UK QUESTIONS.
The guys prepared to answer our questions so lets ask some!
My Questions - apparently they are best to be asked DIRECTLY to him as if you are talking to him?
My Questions to YOU Paulie,
You are very slick and mobile and tougher than we imagined so my questions to you are
1) Will you fight Witter in May and if not WHY NOT?
2) What do you think of the blatant ducking of Witter by Hatton for the last 7 years.
3) Who in your opinion has the guts to fight Witter apart from yourself.
4) Who do you think should be the Ring Champion at 140?
DG
UK Boxing.

Posted: 02 Mar 2008, 17:13
by Poncey
If people say his name three times, does he appear?
Posted: 02 Mar 2008, 17:14
by DG.
Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:If people say his name three times, does he appear?
Try it tonight and see!
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Posted: 03 Mar 2008, 04:20
by DG.
No questions????
Come on children, even if you are not a member of that Forum,. just post them here and I will post them over there for you!
What happened to all the Witter fans?
There is an offer on the table for Paulie to fight Witter - Paulie want the fight so go over there and convince him.
WE ALL KNOW HATTON IS TOO CHICKEN SHIT TO TAKE THE WITTER FIGHT.
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Posted: 03 Mar 2008, 06:18
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
Is the Ndou bout set in stone and is there a mandatory Ngoudjo rematch as he's being moved back to no1 challenger
When will Paulie be free to unify without restrictions from?
What was his thoughts after watching the Ngoudjo tape and the talk that a majority of fans had Herman winning, myself included
How serious is Paulie about making a unification with Witter or is a Hatton fight more likely. Which style would Paulie prefer
Posted: 04 Mar 2008, 03:50
by DG.
All questions put to Beetlejuioce willl be answered on March 8th so.........................................................................chop chop!
Witter Witter!
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Posted: 04 Mar 2008, 11:21
by sharpei_louis
I've said it before and I'll say it again - if the Witter fans are so anti-Hatton (in that he has dodged Witter and isn't as good as everyone makes him out to be) why keep mentioning him??? This is a Paulie Maglinaggi post, and still Witter fans come on banging on about Hatton??
Please, do your guy a favour and give him some distance from Hatton. He's a more than credible World Champion, a very dangerous opponent for anyone and should be more than capable of establishing himself firmly in the record books without keep talking about another fighter. Close the chapter; Hatton is scared, Witter is better. Move on. What do you want? If your aim is to get Hatton Witter to fight to prove Junior is the better man, why bother - given that you already rate Junior higher?
Posted: 04 Mar 2008, 13:54
by DG.
sharpei_louis wrote:I've said it before and I'll say it again - if the Witter fans are so anti-Hatton (in that he has dodged Witter and isn't as good as everyone makes him out to be) why keep mentioning him??? This is a Paulie Maglinaggi post, and still Witter fans come on banging on about Hatton??
Please, do your guy a favour and give him some distance from Hatton. He's a more than credible World Champion, a very dangerous opponent for anyone and should be more than capable of establishing himself firmly in the record books without keep talking about another fighter. Close the chapter; Hatton is scared, Witter is better. Move on. What do you want? If your aim is to get Hatton Witter to fight to prove Junior is the better man, why bother - given that you already rate Junior higher?
To bring you up to speed.
Witters people have made an offer to PM.
Hatton is supposed to make an offer to PM
PM wants WITTER unless Hatton comes up with a guarantee asap.
SO, we are asking PM his thoughts on both - PM will be answering all questions this Saturday so we are ASKING questions.
DO YOU THINK HATTON WOULD ALLOW QUESTIONS?
Like fcuk would he.
There are many threads to post on so if you do not like this one then don't post on it. It's your choice.

Posted: 04 Mar 2008, 14:37
by Matt W
Posted: 04 Mar 2008, 15:49
by DG.
Leave Beetlejuice alone!

Posted: 04 Mar 2008, 18:04
by sharpei_louis
Yeah it's not that I don't like the post, you've more than got a right to post and that's my opinion on it. If you aren't after opinion then why post in the first place?
I understand asking Maglinaggi about Witter, and about Hatton, but why would you want to ask him what he thinks about Hatton dodging Witter? That's a bit obsessional if you ask me. And I know you didn't!
Posted: 04 Mar 2008, 19:34
by DG.
sharpei_louis wrote:Yeah it's not that I don't like the post, you've more than got a right to post and that's my opinion on it. If you aren't after opinion then why post in the first place?
I understand asking Maglinaggi about Witter, and about Hatton, but why would you want to ask him what he thinks about Hatton dodging Witter? That's a bit obsessional if you ask me. And I know you didn't!
PM is a fighter who went in with COTTO - he wants to go back in with Cotto who is is perceived by many to be the best at 147.
I want to know what a FELLOW PRO thinks of the blatant dodging of WITTER by Hatton.
Nothing wrong with that and I look forward to reading what PM has to say about it.
I think most would be interested.

Posted: 05 Mar 2008, 07:00
by sharpei_louis
DG. wrote:sharpei_louis wrote:Yeah it's not that I don't like the post, you've more than got a right to post and that's my opinion on it. If you aren't after opinion then why post in the first place?
I understand asking Maglinaggi about Witter, and about Hatton, but why would you want to ask him what he thinks about Hatton dodging Witter? That's a bit obsessional if you ask me. And I know you didn't!
PM is a fighter who went in with COTTO - he wants to go back in with Cotto who is is perceived by many to be the best at 147.
I want to know what a FELLOW PRO thinks of the blatant dodging of WITTER by Hatton.
Nothing wrong with that and I look forward to reading what PM has to say about it.
I think most would be interested.

Why didn't you mention Cotto or 147 in the original post then?
You're not interested in Malignaggi, only the Witter-Hatton situation!
That's all you've proposed to ask PM about above - pardon me if I misread that, but your list of questions focusses solely on that and not at all on his take on a Cotto rematch or anything at all on his [PM] career outside of Junior Witter!
I guess I would be interested to hear what he's got to say about it, but I don't think it'd be my burning question like it is yours!! I like you bringing Witter to the table for Malignaggi, it's a credible fight - my point is, do you think you damage Witter's credibility by continually linking him to Hatton? IMO there's no need to dredge Hatton's name into it.
Please understand I am pretty neutral in this debate and am a fan of Witter, I agree Hatton has dodged him to a certain extent and would be gutted if they never made that match - I just see a lot of linking between Hatton-Witter when there are plenty of fights for JW to make, and I read the post as you being a Witter fan. Why bring Hatton up in the context of the Witter fight and not in the context of PM's next move?
Posted: 05 Mar 2008, 09:17
by DG.
sharpei_louis wrote:DG. wrote:sharpei_louis wrote:Yeah it's not that I don't like the post, you've more than got a right to post and that's my opinion on it. If you aren't after opinion then why post in the first place?
I understand asking Maglinaggi about Witter, and about Hatton, but why would you want to ask him what he thinks about Hatton dodging Witter? That's a bit obsessional if you ask me. And I know you didn't!
PM is a fighter who went in with COTTO - he wants to go back in with Cotto who is is perceived by many to be the best at 147.
I want to know what a FELLOW PRO thinks of the blatant dodging of WITTER by Hatton.
Nothing wrong with that and I look forward to reading what PM has to say about it.
I think most would be interested.

Why didn't you mention Cotto or 147 in the original post then?
You're not interested in Malignaggi, only the Witter-Hatton situation!
That's all you've proposed to ask PM about above - pardon me if I misread that, but your list of questions focusses solely on that and not at all on his take on a Cotto rematch or anything at all on his [PM] career outside of Junior Witter!
I guess I would be interested to hear what he's got to say about it, but I don't think it'd be my burning question like it is yours!! I like you bringing Witter to the table for Malignaggi, it's a credible fight - my point is, do you think you damage Witter's credibility by continually linking him to Hatton? IMO there's no need to dredge Hatton's name into it.
Please understand I am pretty neutral in this debate and am a fan of Witter, I agree Hatton has dodged him to a certain extent and would be gutted if they never made that match - I just see a lot of linking between Hatton-Witter when there are plenty of fights for JW to make, and I read the post as you being a Witter fan. Why bring Hatton up in the context of the Witter fight and not in the context of PM's next move?
If you visited the thread - you will see someone has already asked about COTTO and there is no poijnt me asking the same question.
I am not doing any harm to Witters reputation by mentioning Hatton
The 2 are linked FULL STOP!
At the moment Witter has tabled an offer to fight PM and PM is answering questions.
At the moment HATTON is supposed to give a guarantee to PM.
The 3 fighters are linked.
Also remember that PM has already said that Witter is the most underrated foghter at 140lbs and he is willing to fight him.
I would prefer HAtton Vs Witter but while Hatton runs I want to see Witter get a payday!
Go and read the thread!

Posted: 05 Mar 2008, 09:21
by DG.
sharpei_louis wrote:Yeah it's not that I don't like the post, you've more than got a right to post and that's my opinion on it. If you aren't after opinion then why post in the first place?
I understand asking Maglinaggi about Witter, and about Hatton, but why would you want to ask him what he thinks about Hatton dodging Witter? That's a bit obsessional if you ask me. And I know you didn't!
Are you Hatton?
Imagine training from the age of 7 to acheive something in the sport and when you get to the top (World Champion) your biggest rival runs away like a biitch.
I also asked PM who in his opinion should be the ring champion at 140Lbs. imo - it should not be Hatton!
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Posted: 05 Mar 2008, 09:32
by Max Molyneux
Posted: 05 Mar 2008, 09:32
by DG.
Posted: 05 Mar 2008, 15:05
by sharpei_louis
My god you're really uptight about this aren't you? I agree that Hatton is overrated. I also agree that the fighters are all linked, by being in the top few of the 140 category. I fail to see how anything I've said can make you resort to saying 'are you Hatton'??
Man you are really fraught about this situation. My point is this; Witter can fight any of the top boys and surpass Hatton's achievements, regardless of what Hatton spouts about Witter not being a big enough payday, Witter certainly has it within his own grasp to dictate the course of his career. I think it's a problem for him that he has become so synonymous with Hatton, it's clear to even the casual observer that Hatton has dodged him but Witter IMO would benefit from moving away from him and achieving a position to dictate to Hatton when and where the fight takes place. You're perpetuating this situation with banging on about their intrinsicity.
Coming out saying 'are you Hatton' is an amazing response to what I've said, it's so laughable that it warrants a response from a purely theoretical point of view to see where you're going with it and how you got there. I love your passion, and agree with your points. I just wonder why you keep making that point.
Posted: 05 Mar 2008, 15:16
by DG.
sharpei_louis wrote:
I think it's a problem for him that he has become so synonymous with Hatton, it's clear to even the casual observer that Hatton has dodged him but Witter IMO would benefit from moving away from him and achieving a position to dictate to Hatton when and where the fight takes place. You're perpetuating this situation with banging on about their intrinsicity.
The 'are you Hatton' was a joke!
By fighting and beating PM I believe Witter closes off another avenue for the 'Man of the People' while elevating himself .
Surely you can see how that will help Witter dictate the situation and maybe one day get the paydays and status within world boxing that I and many others think he deserves.

Posted: 05 Mar 2008, 15:39
by sharpei_louis
Absolutely, now that I agree with 100%, no complaints, I just felt that it was a bit detrimental to Witter to even bring Hatton into it. With the right moves, he could genuinely get to the point in a year's time that Hatton is calling him out. I don't think Malignaggi is at the point of being able to field offers, and I don't expect Hatton to make a difficult fight for his next matchup (or even the one after depending how that goes)
Posted: 05 Mar 2008, 16:51
by DG.
sharpei_louis wrote:Absolutely, now that I agree with 100%, no complaints, I just felt that it was a bit detrimental to Witter to even bring Hatton into it. With the right moves, he could genuinely get to the point in a year's time that Hatton is calling him out. I don't think Malignaggi is at the point of being able to field offers, and I don't expect Hatton to make a difficult fight for his next matchup (or even the one after depending how that goes)
BUT I do not think Hatton will ever call Witer out - he will have to be backed into a corner and have no choice and then he will reluctantly accept a Witter fight.

Posted: 06 Mar 2008, 09:20
by sharpei_louis
No I can't see it either, it'd mean too much of a climb down for him - 'oh yeah that guy I didn't need, well I do now'.
Still think Junior has plenty of great fights to be made, would love to see Malignaggi take the fight, cause although there's the obvious clash of styles I think technically it'd be a great fight and Witter would really be looking to impress. Fingers crossed.
Posted: 06 Mar 2008, 14:54
by DG.
sharpei_louis wrote:No I can't see it either, it'd mean too much of a climb down for him - 'oh yeah that guy I didn't need, well I do now'.
Still think Junior has plenty of great fights to be made, would love to see Malignaggi take the fight, cause although there's the obvious clash of styles I think technically it'd be a great fight and Witter would really be looking to impress. Fingers crossed.
