Posted: 30 Mar 2008, 14:27
My grand would be on Calzaghe.
he might never have been dominated but then he ain't boxed Joe Calzaghe before. Hopkins has 2 chances to win this fight, slim and none, and slim just left town. So I suppose the answer is my grand would be on a Calzaghe victory, he's just too good to get jobbed IMO.search wrote:If you had 1 grand and you had to put it on one of them, who would you back?
There are two ways to look at the fight. Hopkins is a wiley character and could make it very close and tough for Calzaghe who is stepping up and fighting Hopkins at a weight Hopkins is used to now and IN AMERICA. So who knows what the judges will do.
Then you could say that Hopkins is way past it and will get overwhelmed. I have to admit, for a while I thought 1/2 on Calzaghe was VALUE but now I am leaning towards Hopkins. Mainly because he is savvy and will definately have a plan and has a granite chin and has never been dominated.
I'd have my grand on Hopkins.
Spud, no disrespect but you don't have to keep the trainer's name annonymous... it was in the last edition of Boxing Monthly.Spud wrote:I want Calzaghe to win - despite heavy criticsms in the past - I really want the lad to win!!! - in addition Hopkins is one arrogant w*nker and it would be great to see him get whooped.
Said it before though and will say it again - 5/2 on Hopkins is a good bet - I have convinced myself that the judges will rob Calzaghe blind - Calzaghe will win the fight alright but how many times have the judge seen a completely different fight.
A very well know trainer of a multi world champion is completely convinced Hopkins will take Calzaghe to school - argued for a good 15 minutes with him that I could not see this - gave him by robbing judges theory and he could see my thinking.
stujones wrote:Spud, no disrespect but you don't have to keep the trainer's name annonymous... it was in the last edition of Boxing Monthly.Spud wrote:I want Calzaghe to win - despite heavy criticsms in the past - I really want the lad to win!!! - in addition Hopkins is one arrogant w*nker and it would be great to see him get whooped.
Said it before though and will say it again - 5/2 on Hopkins is a good bet - I have convinced myself that the judges will rob Calzaghe blind - Calzaghe will win the fight alright but how many times have the judge seen a completely different fight.
A very well know trainer of a multi world champion is completely convinced Hopkins will take Calzaghe to school - argued for a good 15 minutes with him that I could not see this - gave him by robbing judges theory and he could see my thinking.
Whatever you say Stu.stujones wrote:Spud, no disrespect but you don't have to keep the trainer's name annonymous... it was in the last edition of Boxing Monthly.Spud wrote:I want Calzaghe to win - despite heavy criticsms in the past - I really want the lad to win!!! - in addition Hopkins is one arrogant w*nker and it would be great to see him get whooped.
Said it before though and will say it again - 5/2 on Hopkins is a good bet - I have convinced myself that the judges will rob Calzaghe blind - Calzaghe will win the fight alright but how many times have the judge seen a completely different fight.
A very well know trainer of a multi world champion is completely convinced Hopkins will take Calzaghe to school - argued for a good 15 minutes with him that I could not see this - gave him by robbing judges theory and he could see my thinking.
How can age be irrelevant Dave, that's a ridiculous comment.DavidPayne wrote:A draw isn't beyond the realms of possibility.
I strongly favour Calzaghe, but Hopkins is far more live in this fight than anyone is giving him credit for.
He just beat two southpaws, one of whom hit much harder than Calzaghe, he's tall, strong, granite chinned and has a stiff right hand that Calzaghe will walk on to, he's brilliant inside and is on home territory.
Age is irrelevant.
Calzaghe has the style and speed to win, but isn't a foregone conclusion.
You gotta love Stu Jones :)stujones wrote:Spud, no disrespect but you don't have to keep the trainer's name annonymous... it was in the last edition of Boxing Monthly.Spud wrote:I want Calzaghe to win - despite heavy criticsms in the past - I really want the lad to win!!! - in addition Hopkins is one arrogant w*nker and it would be great to see him get whooped.
Said it before though and will say it again - 5/2 on Hopkins is a good bet - I have convinced myself that the judges will rob Calzaghe blind - Calzaghe will win the fight alright but how many times have the judge seen a completely different fight.
A very well know trainer of a multi world champion is completely convinced Hopkins will take Calzaghe to school - argued for a good 15 minutes with him that I could not see this - gave him by robbing judges theory and he could see my thinking.
Not sure about it being a clever move, it has been a burning ambition of Joes to fight Hopkins for years now. Joe pleaded with Hopkins quite a few years ago to fight him but Hopkins told Joe to get in line behind all the others who wanted the chance. Finally Joe has a big enough name in America and Hopkins has finally agreed. For Joe its a dream come true but I think Joe would have preferred fighting him in his prime rather than at 43. Even so Hopkins is still good enough to give Joe problems. My money would have to go on Joe for a points win. No way will Joe get a KO victory, but one mistake, a bit of showboating and Hopkins might.mimmy123 wrote:yes my grand would be on calzaghe too. its a easy fight for Joe in my opinion, took this fight at the right time. 3 or 4 years ago i would go for Bernard. This is a clever move for the calzaghe camp a great name on your record and its looks brill on paper.
Kessler caught Joe with a very good uppercut and it had very little effect. I don't see Hopkins knocking out Calzaghe.WildWaylon wrote:Not sure about it being a clever move, it has been a burning ambition of Joes to fight Hopkins for years now. Joe pleaded with Hopkins quite a few years ago to fight him but Hopkins told Joe to get in line behind all the others who wanted the chance. Finally Joe has a big enough name in America and Hopkins has finally agreed. For Joe its a dream come true but I think Joe would have preferred fighting him in his prime rather than at 43. Even so Hopkins is still good enough to give Joe problems. My money would have to go on Joe for a points win. No way will Joe get a KO victory, but one mistake, a bit of showboating and Hopkins might.mimmy123 wrote:yes my grand would be on calzaghe too. its a easy fight for Joe in my opinion, took this fight at the right time. 3 or 4 years ago i would go for Bernard. This is a clever move for the calzaghe camp a great name on your record and its looks brill on paper.
I agree Hopkins is not a big puncher and Joes chin is good.Asterix wrote:Kessler caught Joe with a very good uppercut and it had very little effect. I don't see Hopkins knocking out Calzaghe.WildWaylon wrote:Not sure about it being a clever move, it has been a burning ambition of Joes to fight Hopkins for years now. Joe pleaded with Hopkins quite a few years ago to fight him but Hopkins told Joe to get in line behind all the others who wanted the chance. Finally Joe has a big enough name in America and Hopkins has finally agreed. For Joe its a dream come true but I think Joe would have preferred fighting him in his prime rather than at 43. Even so Hopkins is still good enough to give Joe problems. My money would have to go on Joe for a points win. No way will Joe get a KO victory, but one mistake, a bit of showboating and Hopkins might.mimmy123 wrote:yes my grand would be on calzaghe too. its a easy fight for Joe in my opinion, took this fight at the right time. 3 or 4 years ago i would go for Bernard. This is a clever move for the calzaghe camp a great name on your record and its looks brill on paper.