Derry mathews v Steve Foster
Posted: 30 Mar 2008, 22:27
Could Foster win this one , I think he has more chance than the bookies think. Late KO = 50-1+.
Horse wrote:The fight is off. Matthews is fighting Tseveenpurev now. Foster decided he could not get down to featherweight.
How did the ref help him out?The_Don1 wrote:Derry got battered, the ref tried to help him out as best he could, the ref's behaviour was like something you'd see in Germany.
I didn't think Derry beat Simpson a year ago, so maybe its karma time for him tonight.
It was amazing that the referee let it continue after the third knockdown, and allowed them to clean his spat out gumshield.Horse wrote:How did the ref help him out?The_Don1 wrote:Derry got battered, the ref tried to help him out as best he could, the ref's behaviour was like something you'd see in Germany.
I didn't think Derry beat Simpson a year ago, so maybe its karma time for him tonight.
see whicker's above post, sums it all up.Horse wrote:How did the ref help him out?The_Don1 wrote:Derry got battered, the ref tried to help him out as best he could, the ref's behaviour was like something you'd see in Germany.
I didn't think Derry beat Simpson a year ago, so maybe its karma time for him tonight.
Wasn't game over when Corrales spat out the gum shield, he was just trying pro tatics like timing getting up from a knockdown right but Choi's power got him eventually.whicker wrote:It was amazing that the referee let it continue after the third knockdown, and allowed them to clean his spat out gumshield.Horse wrote:How did the ref help him out?The_Don1 wrote:Derry got battered, the ref tried to help him out as best he could, the ref's behaviour was like something you'd see in Germany.
I didn't think Derry beat Simpson a year ago, so maybe its karma time for him tonight.
3 knockdowns and a spat out gum shield usually means "game over."
I like lenient refereeing, so I didn't have a problem with the ref letting it go on. The gumshield situation happens quite a lot, so that was not especially unfair to Tseveenpurev.whicker wrote:It was amazing that the referee let it continue after the third knockdown, and allowed them to clean his spat out gumshield.Horse wrote:How did the ref help him out?The_Don1 wrote:Derry got battered, the ref tried to help him out as best he could, the ref's behaviour was like something you'd see in Germany.
I didn't think Derry beat Simpson a year ago, so maybe its karma time for him tonight.
3 knockdowns and a spat out gum shield usually means "game over."
But the constant warnings to both fighters when Matthews was gone was as bad as the Gum shield incident.Horse wrote:I like lenient refereeing, so I didn't have a problem with the ref letting it go on. The gumshield situation happens quite a lot, so that was not especially unfair to Tseveenpurev.whicker wrote:It was amazing that the referee let it continue after the third knockdown, and allowed them to clean his spat out gumshield.Horse wrote:How did the ref help him out?
3 knockdowns and a spat out gum shield usually means "game over."
Horse wrote:I like lenient refereeing, so I didn't have a problem with the ref letting it go on. The gumshield situation happens quite a lot, so that was not especially unfair to Tseveenpurev.whicker wrote:It was amazing that the referee let it continue after the third knockdown, and allowed them to clean his spat out gumshield.Horse wrote:How did the ref help him out?
3 knockdowns and a spat out gum shield usually means "game over."
Exactly!whicker wrote:Horse wrote:I like lenient refereeing, so I didn't have a problem with the ref letting it go on. The gumshield situation happens quite a lot, so that was not especially unfair to Tseveenpurev.whicker wrote: It was amazing that the referee let it continue after the third knockdown, and allowed them to clean his spat out gumshield.
3 knockdowns and a spat out gum shield usually means "game over."
Fair point- But in a British ring the referee is typically quick to stop a fight, rather than being lenient, letting it go on etc.
The question- would the referee have allowed that fight to go on if it was the "away" fighter who had gone down for a third time?
He most likely would have stopped it if it was the other way around. But, as that never happened I am not going to criticize the referee for being lenient to the home fighter.whicker wrote:Horse wrote:I like lenient refereeing, so I didn't have a problem with the ref letting it go on. The gumshield situation happens quite a lot, so that was not especially unfair to Tseveenpurev.
Fair point- But in a British ring the referee is typically quick to stop a fight, rather than being lenient, letting it go on etc.
The question- would the referee have allowed that fight to go on if it was the "away" fighter who had gone down for a third time?
that post is completely spot on likewise Don1.Carlos-Wigan wrote:That was the most disgraceful round of refereeing I have ever seen in this country.
We laugh when we saw the Braithwaite vs Hernandez cruiserweight fight where the German referee was helping out the local based Cuban but it is no better over here!
A very honest assesment by Derry afterwards - lets hope the excuses don't start to materialize because he came across as a proper man afterwards and what he said was true - he was beaten by the better man!
Well done Choi - I never saw that coming either!
Choi isn't exactly a foreign import. He has lived in England now for about 7 years. I think "import" is generally used to mean fighters who are just brought in for that specific fight, who live and work in a foreign country.knockout wrote:winning by one point in your home town against an unattractive foreign import means you lost...
whatever, you know what i mean... he is hardly going to get the referee on his side fighting as an opponent in scotland against a scottish fighter, was the point i was making....whicker wrote:Choi isn't exactly a foreign import. He has lived in England now for about 7 years. I think "import" is generally used to mean fighters who are just brought in for that specific fight, who live and work in a foreign country.knockout wrote:winning by one point in your home town against an unattractive foreign import means you lost...
I see what you mean- I just thought it was best to make that point. A lot of people seem to be under the impression that Choi was just brought in for the bout, but no- he is a locally based fighter.knockout wrote:whatever, you know what i mean... he is hardly going to get the referee on his side fighting as an opponent in scotland against a scottish fighter, was the point i was making....whicker wrote:Choi isn't exactly a foreign import. He has lived in England now for about 7 years. I think "import" is generally used to mean fighters who are just brought in for that specific fight, who live and work in a foreign country.knockout wrote:winning by one point in your home town against an unattractive foreign import means you lost...
or do you disagree??
yeah no probs, i see what your saying...whicker wrote:I see what you mean- I just thought it was best to make that point. A lot of people seem to be under the impression that Choi was just brought in for the bout, but no- he is a locally based fighter.knockout wrote:whatever, you know what i mean... he is hardly going to get the referee on his side fighting as an opponent in scotland against a scottish fighter, was the point i was making....whicker wrote: Choi isn't exactly a foreign import. He has lived in England now for about 7 years. I think "import" is generally used to mean fighters who are just brought in for that specific fight, who live and work in a foreign country.
or do you disagree??
....
I've just seen video footage- after the 5th knockdown Matthews was rolling on the floor with his gumshield out, clearly the ref should have stopped it rather than doing a full ten count.
bollox to the big ass reputation I've reffed on tele loads I'm the dog's bollox..........what is the man a physician?? a general practitioner? a doctor? NO.....Derry Matthews was busted right up, it's just thankful he seemed okay when interviewed.NorthEastBoxingFan wrote:Paris was sh@t end of.......as for the thread starter.......what's that all about , there was a thread up weeks ago it was Matthews vs. Tsevenpureev for a while now.