Lennox Lewis vs Joe Bugner.
Posted: 01 Apr 2008, 21:00
Both in their prime.12 rounds.Who wins.
Very unlikely.bjermaine wrote:lennox with an early KO.
Much more likely.dempseyfire wrote:Lewis by decision.
Lennox wouldn't knockout the strong-chinned Englishman, but he'd gain the edge with greater offensive output and put Joe into a shell of somewhat with a few of his patented uppercuts. Good competetive fight though. Bugner's jab would give Lennox fits.
Close enough, but depends on precisely when you put Lewis' peak. LL from '95 onward went into 'Bare-Minimum' mode for a couple of rounds in every fight, so I'll call it 10-2 Lewis. I think the much faster, much more athletic and slightly greener version of Lewis in '92 shuts him out completely.overhand_right wrote:A close fight? When did Bugner make it close against any top fighter? Even Ron Lyle totally shut him out over 12 rds.
Bugner would go into his shell and provide a very durable, immobile target for LL. 120-108 looks probable.
I love your posts John, but your memory fails you this time. Stop drinking beers paid for you by Joe Bugner!The Great John L wrote:Lyle shut Bugner out? Oi Vey. Bugner did very well early in that fight, but faded late to lose a close decision. I haven't seen the fight since it was broadcast, but remember it quite well.
And Ron Lyle was a VERY good fighter who came within spitting distance of beating both Ali and Foreman.
Lewis wins a convincing, but competitive decision over Bugner.
Go watch the film, Bugner won at least 5 rounds.overhand_right wrote:I love your posts John, but your memory fails you this time. Stop drinking beers paid for you by Joe Bugner!The Great John L wrote:Lyle shut Bugner out? Oi Vey. Bugner did very well early in that fight, but faded late to lose a close decision. I haven't seen the fight since it was broadcast, but remember it quite well.
And Ron Lyle was a VERY good fighter who came within spitting distance of beating both Ali and Foreman.
Lewis wins a convincing, but competitive decision over Bugner.
Lyle was all over Bugner from the opening bell and basically pummelled him. Bugner himself is quoted as saying 'that was the only fight where i asked myself 'why am i doing this?' '.
I love Ron Lyle but he was never going to come out on top v Ali or Foreman. As soon as Ali opened up on him (well other than the 8th rd) on the 11th, Lyle was gone.
I think the difference here is that I actually saw the fight. And there’s nothing wrong with my memory.overhand_right wrote:I love your posts John, but your memory fails you this time.
That could be an accurate quote because Lyle took Joe to deep waters in the second half of the fight. However, since I’ve actually seen the fight, I know that Joe pretty much swept all of the early rounds.overhand_right wrote:Bugner himself is quoted as saying 'that was the only fight where i asked myself 'why am i doing this?' '.
I’ve actually seen those fights too.overhand_right wrote:I love Ron Lyle but he was never going to come out on top v Ali or Foreman.
Thanks, that's just as I remember it. Lyle wanted it more and won it late in a close decision.mercman wrote:Much of Lyle v Bugner is on Youtube so anyone can watch it. Lyle laid some heavy leather on Bugner late on but he never at any time looked like stopping him. It was a very close fight - the scorecards are there on Youtube too and if anything I would say the fight looks closer than the judges scored it. Bugner won most of the early rounds and had he had more conviction could have won this one.
Well Ali himself had said that he felt Joe would become champion someday. He gave Joe very high marks.joe kurtz wrote:Bugner was,indeed, an enigma.
He had such good size ( especially for the '70s ), physical talent ( aside from his less than spectacular power ) & proper schooling that it's almost ridiculous that he lost to the likes of Jack Bodell, Marvis Frazier & Stefan Tangstad. Yeah, by the time of the latter two bouts he was past it & had been retired on & off several times, but still ...![]()
Then there's his completely passive effort in his lone attempt at the world title.Just bizarre.
I've never seen his first fight with Ali, but he must have given a good account of himself during it or he wouldn't have been given a return bout. Correct?
Yes, it was a very competitive bout.joe kurtz wrote:I've never seen his first fight with Ali, but he must have given a good account of himself during it or he wouldn't have been given a return bout. Correct?
The first fight was much better than the 2nd. Bugner in the rematch I think, like Lyle, was suffering from "Rope-a-Dopeitis" in that he became obsessed with punching himself out and thus failed to exert himself when he needed to.joe kurtz wrote:Bugner was,indeed, an enigma.
He had such good size ( especially for the '70s ), physical talent ( aside from his less than spectacular power ) & proper schooling that it's almost ridiculous that he lost to the likes of Jack Bodell, Marvis Frazier & Stefan Tangstad. Yeah, by the time of the latter two bouts he was past it & had been retired on & off several times, but still ...![]()
Then there's his completely passive effort in his lone attempt at the world title.Just bizarre.
I've never seen his first fight with Ali, but he must have given a good account of himself during it or he wouldn't have been given a return bout. Correct?
Extremely doubtful, to the point of being impossible.bjermaine wrote:lennox with an early KO.
dempseyfire wrote:overhand_right wrote:
He was leading on the scorecards when he got stopped by Ali.
And saying "as soon as Ali opened up on him, Lyle was gone", seemingly presuming that Ali could've taken him out "whenever he wanted" is beyond ridiculous. That's like saying "as soon as Ali opened up on Foreman (other than the 5th round), he was gone" . . .
.