Page 1 of 2

London to Cooney: Does America Still Want a White Hope?

Posted: 08 Apr 2008, 16:41
by HomicideHenry
Ever since Jack London wrote the epic phrase: "Only one thing remains! Jeffries must emurge from his alfalfa farm and remove that golden smile from Johnson's face, Jeff it's up to you!", there has been a collection of fighters, mainly from the boondocks and the hills of the Ozarks and beyond, with colorful characters and even wilder bios whom much of 'white America' were behind when going up against a black champion.

Even when Joe Louis came around, there was still this underlying urge that maybe Tony Galento, or Buddy Baer, or even Arturo Gudoy would have somehow been able to drop and stop the 'Brown Bomber' in the ring. And though a white man wouldn't beat him again until after he was no longer champion, though it saddened a majority, the world raved silently that Rocky Marciano so thoroughly battered the ex champion.

This attitude carried on even when Ali was around, when he fought such men as Jerry Quarry, and even humorously some pulled for Wepner with fliers that read "Give the white guy a chance", all the while Ali would quote "I was determined to be the one person the white man didn't get."

But it possibly didn't get any more severe, in this thought process, than the biggest fight of the 1980's which was Gerry Cooney and Larry Holmes. Cooney was on the cover of Sports Illustrated and Time magazine, he even had the President's backing for the fight. Holmes, great champion that he had been, was in a sense thrown to the side as if he was a piece of parsley on a dinner plate, and Cooney was the steak that everyone wanted. Holmes, of course, went on to stop Cooney in the hard luck round, the 13th.

Since then, there has hardly been much talk of this, though during 2000-2004 there was great interest in both Klitschko brothers, though they were not American.

When Tommy Morrison came back after 11 years, though there was much controversy in his comeback due to supposedly having HIV, there seemed to be an underlying pulse pick back up again with the possibility of a 'white hope'. And it wasnt just Morrison either. The talk began again, when Joe Mesi came back after having a brain bleed.

I guess the question, to each fan on here is this: Do you think America is still longing for a white hope?

Posted: 08 Apr 2008, 17:07
by Expug
Im not trying to downplay your question at all.
Unfortunately I dont think the general public gives a shit about boxing anymore or any of that white hope stuff.
Its not the same, as it was in the 80s and before.
People used to rally around there own ethnic groups in boxing. Irish, Italian , Jewish ,whatever. This was at the heart of the old neighborhood rivalries.
Jimmy McClarnin vs. Ross , Leonard etc.Many , many others.
Nowadays if I told somebody I liked Billy Conn cuz he was a good Irish fighter, they would call me a racist.
Boxing used to be fun, no ones laughing anymore.
In our politically correct world, boxing dont fit.

Posted: 08 Apr 2008, 17:15
by dempseyfire
Only loony Mid-Western truckers gave a hoot about Morrison's "comeback"
Maybe the current scene forum was a little abuzz, but I think it was more due to nostalgia purposes. Look at the buzz that erupts when Tyson blows his nose.

If Ike Ibeabuchi came back you can bet boxrec would be crawling with fleas.

As to the General Public, they don't care about HW boxing, much less some White Hope. I think the casual fans would at the most prefer a champion with a last name that didn't end in a 'v' or an 'o'.

Posted: 08 Apr 2008, 17:36
by raylawpc
Consciously, no. Subconsciously, yes.

If a handsome, articulate white heavyweight in the mold of - let's say - Peyton Manning burst upon the boxing scene, winning fight after fight in a steady climb to a title shot, I have little doubt that interest in boxing would increase dramatically.

I hate to say it, but I suspect its true.

Posted: 08 Apr 2008, 18:02
by Robinson
I think there is a longing for a Black Hope now days

Posted: 09 Apr 2008, 14:01
by Smokin'Moe
i dont think boxing is too racially motivated anymore, thats not to say it doesn't exist at all.
As long as insecurity among humans exist, racism exists

i think the fans would be happy with just any heavyweight hope who actually gave a damn and showed heart in his fights

Posted: 09 Apr 2008, 18:16
by Robinson
agreed

Re: London to Cooney: Does America Still Want a White Hope?

Posted: 09 Apr 2008, 18:53
by Brute
HomicideHenry wrote:Ever since Jack London wrote the epic phrase: "Only one thing remains! Jeffries must emurge from his alfalfa farm and remove that golden smile from Johnson's face, Jeff it's up to you!", there has been a collection of fighters, mainly from the boondocks and the hills of the Ozarks and beyond, with colorful characters and even wilder bios whom much of 'white America' were behind when going up against a black champion.

Even when Joe Louis came around, there was still this underlying urge that maybe Tony Galento, or Buddy Baer, or even Arturo Gudoy would have somehow been able to drop and stop the 'Brown Bomber' in the ring. And though a white man wouldn't beat him again until after he was no longer champion, though it saddened a majority, the world raved silently that Rocky Marciano so thoroughly battered the ex champion.

This attitude carried on even when Ali was around, when he fought such men as Jerry Quarry, and even humorously some pulled for Wepner with fliers that read "Give the white guy a chance", all the while Ali would quote "I was determined to be the one Jungle Bunny the white man didn't get."

But it possibly didn't get any more severe, in this thought process, than the biggest fight of the 1980's which was Gerry Cooney and Larry Holmes. Cooney was on the cover of Sports Illustrated and Time magazine, he even had the President's backing for the fight. Holmes, great champion that he had been, was in a sense thrown to the side as if he was a piece of parsley on a dinner plate, and Cooney was the steak that everyone wanted. Holmes, of course, went on to stop Cooney in the hard luck round, the 13th.

Since then, there has hardly been much talk of this, though during 2000-2004 there was great interest in both Klitschko brothers, though they were not American.

When Tommy Morrison came back after 11 years, though there was much controversy in his comeback due to supposedly having HIV, there seemed to be an underlying pulse pick back up again with the possibility of a 'white hope'. And it wasnt just Morrison either. The talk began again, when Joe
Mesi came back after having a brain bleed.

I guess the question, to each fan on here is this: Do you think America is still longing for a white hope?
So you take the Alf Garnett approach that Europeans not of British descent are not white, but whiteISH? Otherwise why are the eastern European fighters not considered?

As goes being American or not, the best black heavyweight is a Nigerian. The Great White Hope era was a disgraceful time. Jack London was a pathetic alcoholic and should have been ignored.

Posted: 09 Apr 2008, 19:27
by Robinson
Brute

'
A slav is not white nor is it quite human

Nordic, Gaelic and Anglo europeans are white and thus pure.

Eurasian slavs are mongrel races bred by the zionists as a mindless
work force, chained by bolshevik ideals in order to organise the mass hordes of these animal like verminites.

The white races of europe are at threat of being over run by these
in-doctrinated slavic masses.

The world needs a pure heavyweight champion one to show the coloured and
browned skin races of this earth that its master and crowned champion is of the right pure complexion.
"

Mix a bit of Jack London here and add some other writings from another famous early-mid 20th century authour-world leader and you have yourself a good guide book for how the championship should be held.

Re: London to Cooney: Does America Still Want a White Hope?

Posted: 09 Apr 2008, 19:31
by Goodnight, Irene
"So you take the Alf Garnett approach that Europeans not of British descent are not white, but whiteISH? Otherwise why are the eastern European fighters not considered?

As goes being American or not, the best black heavyweight is a Nigerian. The Great White Hope era was a disgraceful time. Jack London was a pathetic alcoholic and should have been ignored." - Brute


How wonderful that you can use the powers of retrospect to cast judgement on those who actually lived in the time. Funny thing is, now you are part of the societal majority. You've decided that's your place, which is why you'd be cheering Jack along with everyone else, had you lived during the time.

Posted: 09 Apr 2008, 21:32
by dagosd2000
Expug wrote:Im not trying to downplay your question at all.
Unfortunately I dont think the general public gives a shit about boxing anymore or any of that white hope stuff.
Its not the same, as it was in the 80s and before.
People used to rally around there own ethnic groups in boxing. Irish, Italian , Jewish ,whatever. This was at the heart of the old neighborhood rivalries.
Jimmy McClarnin vs. Ross , Leonard etc.Many , many others.
Nowadays if I told somebody I liked Billy Conn cuz he was a good Irish fighter, they would call me a racist.
Boxing used to be fun, no ones laughing anymore.
In our politically correct world, boxing dont fit.
Great Comment Buddy

Posted: 10 Apr 2008, 01:44
by Brute
Robinson wrote:Brute

'
A slav is not white nor is it quite human

Nordic, Gaelic and Anglo europeans are white and thus pure.

Eurasian slavs are mongrel races bred by the zionists as a mindless
work force, chained by bolshevik ideals in order to organise the mass hordes of these animal like verminites.

The white races of europe are at threat of being over run by these
in-doctrinated slavic masses.

The world needs a pure heavyweight champion one to show the coloured and
browned skin races of this earth that its master and crowned champion is of the right pure complexion.
"

Mix a bit of Jack London here and add some other writings from another famous early-mid 20th century authour-world leader and you have yourself a good guide book for how the championship should be held.
The last arsehole to think like that shot his wife and himself in 1945.

Re: London to Cooney: Does America Still Want a White Hope?

Posted: 10 Apr 2008, 01:46
by Brute
Goodnight, Irene wrote:"So you take the Alf Garnett approach that Europeans not of British descent are not white, but whiteISH? Otherwise why are the eastern European fighters not considered?

As goes being American or not, the best black heavyweight is a Nigerian. The Great White Hope era was a disgraceful time. Jack London was a pathetic alcoholic and should have been ignored." - Brute


How wonderful that you can use the powers of retrospect to cast judgement on those who actually lived in the time. Funny thing is, now you are part of the societal majority. You've decided that's your place, which is why you'd be cheering Jack along with everyone else, had you lived during the time.
I actually had a great uncle, still alive in my childhood, who was ringside at the Johnson Burns fight. He thought Johnson was the greatest fighter he had ever seen and he was of 100% British Isles descent,

fornicate you. :TU:

Posted: 10 Apr 2008, 12:48
by HomicideHenry
I'm of the opinion that the 'white hope/Johnson era' wasn't a 'disgraceful time' for the sport. Boxing for all intents and purposes, least at Heavywieght, kind of died off, and if it wasn't for Johnson, I don't think boxing's most famous division would have got another 'kick' until Dempsey would have came around.

The coming of white hopes from all across the globe, from every town and corner, made the heavyweight division perk up. Sure racism was the original motivator, but I honestly believe as time grew on, it slowly but surely became more of this: "Who out there can beat Johnson?" because opinion began to change that maybe, just maybe he was as great as he claimed himself to have been or greater than anyone ever thought.

I stand by this belief because for one reason, as hated and as controversial as he was, he could have been killed at any time, but nobody touched him. They waited impatiently, though, for someone to come out of the wood work to defeat him.

Hopes

Posted: 10 Apr 2008, 19:57
by pound per pound
Robinson wrote:I think there is a longing for a Black Hope now days
If Klitschko beats Thompson as we all think he will, the USA will be out of the heavyweight business for a few years. Chambers isn't good enough, and neither is Brock.

I think the USA will take any hope it can get, and if they don't have one the fans who hate Euro heavies will adopt David Haye as their new " hope ".

Re: London to Cooney: Does America Still Want a White Hope?

Posted: 10 Apr 2008, 21:48
by Goodnight, Irene
"I actually had a great uncle, still alive in my childhood, who was ringside at the Johnson Burns fight. He thought Johnson was the greatest fighter he had ever seen and he was of 100% British Isles descent,

eff you. :TU:" - Brute


That's Jack London you'd be cheering, not Johnson, to clarify. I would like to re-iterate, though, how wonderful it is you can condemn the majority thinking back in those days, by aligning yourself to the majority thinking in this day. Good for your uncle, too. I'll bet you're as proud as punch to know that there is someone in your family lineage who isn't as feeble-minded as you are.

:TU: back at ya, champ

Posted: 11 Apr 2008, 04:23
by Robinson
These days we take for granted our 'blind' regard for different races. I remember when I was a kid hearing my grandparents in a matter of fact way refer to other races I shall not quote, but in hindsight I find it funny and well...down right racist-ignorant.

I have a Jack Johnson cardboard card that is from the Burns fight my Grandfather was given when he was a kid from his dad, who saw or was outsde the stadium for the fight. The card is about 12 inches long, and maybe 8 wide, no doubt a collectors item.

Anyhow when he gave it to me I was 7 or so, and he handed it to me saying "This is of the American Negro fighter Johnson, your grand father always said that for a ni&&er he was one fine boxer" it was just the way they spoke and thought of people. He no doubt genuinely admired and respected Johnson but well he was from a different era.

At the time I really did not think much of it as I was not a super big boxing fan..now....I wish I had of asked him more questions. As he was a big fan of the sport.

Posted: 11 Apr 2008, 04:23
by Robinson
These days we take for granted our 'blind' regard for different races. I remember when I was a kid hearing my grandparents in a matter of fact way refer to other races I shall not quote, but in hindsight I find it funny and well...down right racist-ignorant.

I have a Jack Johnson cardboard card that is from the Burns fight my Grandfather was given when he was a kid from his dad, who saw or was outsde the stadium for the fight. The card is about 12 inches long, and maybe 8 wide, no doubt a collectors item.

Anyhow when he gave it to me I was 7 or so, and he handed it to me saying "This is of the American Negro fighter Johnson, your grand father always said that for a ni&&er he was one fine boxer" it was just the way they spoke and thought of people. He no doubt genuinely admired and respected Johnson but well he was from a different era.

At the time I really did not think much of it as I was not a super big boxing fan..now....I wish I had of asked him more questions. As he was a big fan of the sport.

Posted: 11 Apr 2008, 04:23
by Robinson
These days we take for granted our 'blind' regard for different races. I remember when I was a kid hearing my grandparents in a matter of fact way refer to other races I shall not quote, but in hindsight I find it funny and well...down right racist-ignorant.

I have a Jack Johnson cardboard card that is from the Burns fight my Grandfather was given when he was a kid from his dad, who saw or was outsde the stadium for the fight. The card is about 12 inches long, and maybe 8 wide, no doubt a collectors item.

Anyhow when he gave it to me I was 7 or so, and he handed it to me saying "This is of the American Negro fighter Johnson, your grand father always said that for a ni&&er he was one fine boxer" it was just the way they spoke and thought of people. He no doubt genuinely admired and respected Johnson but well he was from a different era.

At the time I really did not think much of it as I was not a super big boxing fan..now....I wish I had of asked him more questions. As he was a big fan of the sport.

Posted: 11 Apr 2008, 04:23
by Robinson
These days we take for granted our 'blind' regard for different races. I remember when I was a kid hearing my grandparents in a matter of fact way refer to other races I shall not quote, but in hindsight I find it funny and well...down right racist-ignorant.

I have a Jack Johnson cardboard card that is from the Burns fight my Grandfather was given when he was a kid from his dad, who saw or was outsde the stadium for the fight. The card is about 12 inches long, and maybe 8 wide, no doubt a collectors item.

Anyhow when he gave it to me I was 7 or so, and he handed it to me saying "This is of the American Negro fighter Johnson, your grand father always said that for a ni&&er he was one fine boxer" it was just the way they spoke and thought of people. He no doubt genuinely admired and respected Johnson but well he was from a different era.

At the time I really did not think much of it as I was not a super big boxing fan..now....I wish I had of asked him more questions. As he was a big fan of the sport.

Posted: 11 Apr 2008, 04:23
by Robinson
These days we take for granted our 'blind' regard for different races. I remember when I was a kid hearing my grandparents in a matter of fact way refer to other races I shall not quote, but in hindsight I find it funny and well...down right racist-ignorant.

I have a Jack Johnson cardboard card that is from the Burns fight my Grandfather was given when he was a kid from his dad, who saw or was outsde the stadium for the fight. The card is about 12 inches long, and maybe 8 wide, no doubt a collectors item.

Anyhow when he gave it to me I was 7 or so, and he handed it to me saying "This is of the American Negro fighter Johnson, your grand father always said that for a ni&&er he was one fine boxer" it was just the way they spoke and thought of people. He no doubt genuinely admired and respected Johnson but well he was from a different era.

At the time I really did not think much of it as I was not a super big boxing fan..now....I wish I had of asked him more questions. As he was a big fan of the sport.

Posted: 11 Apr 2008, 04:23
by Robinson
These days we take for granted our 'blind' regard for different races. I remember when I was a kid hearing my grandparents in a matter of fact way refer to other races I shall not quote, but in hindsight I find it funny and well...down right racist-ignorant.

I have a Jack Johnson cardboard card that is from the Burns fight my Grandfather was given when he was a kid from his dad, who saw or was outsde the stadium for the fight. The card is about 12 inches long, and maybe 8 wide, no doubt a collectors item.

Anyhow when he gave it to me I was 7 or so, and he handed it to me saying "This is of the American Negro fighter Johnson, your grand father always said that for a ni&&er he was one fine boxer" it was just the way they spoke and thought of people. He no doubt genuinely admired and respected Johnson but well he was from a different era.

At the time I really did not think much of it as I was not a super big boxing fan..now....I wish I had of asked him more questions. As he was a big fan of the sport.

Posted: 11 Apr 2008, 04:27
by Robinson
HOw the hell did my post happen that many times !!

Correction the cardboard of Johnson was post the Jeffries fight.

Posted: 11 Apr 2008, 05:08
by Ezzard
Expug wrote:Im not trying to downplay your question at all.
Unfortunately I dont think the general public gives a shit about boxing anymore or any of that white hope stuff.
Its not the same, as it was in the 80s and before.
People used to rally around there own ethnic groups in boxing. Irish, Italian , Jewish ,whatever. This was at the heart of the old neighborhood rivalries.
Jimmy McClarnin vs. Ross , Leonard etc.Many , many others.
Nowadays if I told somebody I liked Billy Conn cuz he was a good Irish fighter, they would call me a racist.
Boxing used to be fun, no ones laughing anymore.
In our politically correct world, boxing dont fit.
Another great post by expug. It's normal for people to rally round their own. It doesn't make it racist. I also think that people don't automatically support their 'own' guy. People select on more than race but it is a factor.

IMO ray is correct when he says that it's more subconscious. I think white might make more box office in but in many ways it's more down to skill and personality.

How much longer will boxers continue to bad mouth and insult one another. It's a tired act now and makes them all seem the same rather than stand out.

Posted: 11 Apr 2008, 09:43
by Expug
Ezzard wrote:
Expug wrote:Im not trying to downplay your question at all.
Unfortunately I dont think the general public gives a shit about boxing anymore or any of that white hope stuff.
Its not the same, as it was in the 80s and before.
People used to rally around there own ethnic groups in boxing. Irish, Italian , Jewish ,whatever. This was at the heart of the old neighborhood rivalries.
Jimmy McClarnin vs. Ross , Leonard etc.Many , many others.
Nowadays if I told somebody I liked Billy Conn cuz he was a good Irish fighter, they would call me a racist.
Boxing used to be fun, no ones laughing anymore.
In our politically correct world, boxing dont fit.
Another great post by expug. It's normal for people to rally round their own. It doesn't make it racist. I also think that people don't automatically support their 'own' guy. People select on more than race but it is a factor.

IMO ray is correct when he says that it's more subconscious. I think white might make more box office in but in many ways it's more down to skill and personality.

How much longer will boxers continue to bad mouth and insult one another. It's a tired act now and makes them all seem the same rather than stand out.
Thanks Ezz.