Page 1 of 1
Fenech-Nelson III
Posted: 09 Apr 2008, 17:51
by Southpaw Stylist
Posted: 09 Apr 2008, 18:19
by Lord Rupert Of Gloucester
Quite sick if you ask me. Such a sorrowful affair.
Posted: 09 Apr 2008, 18:25
by hitman_hatton1
completely ridiculous.
1st fight was excellent.
fenech is right in that he should have got it.
2nd fight was all set up for jeff but he had a stinker of a night.
seems like he's still beating himself up about it.
hence this joke.

Posted: 09 Apr 2008, 18:48
by SticknMove
A rubber match made out of a recycled used condom of a factory way past its sell by date.
I apologise for the flippancy. This just shouldn't happen. These two great fighters should not be encouraged to indulge themselves in past glories in front of a voyeuristic audience.
Posted: 09 Apr 2008, 19:04
by STP
Idiots.
Posted: 10 Apr 2008, 03:57
by DavidPayne
Well Ottke v Dariusz was pulled so they needed a filler.
Posted: 10 Apr 2008, 03:59
by REAL_DEAL
Hopefully Oz TV will not buy any rights and this fight will bomb.
Posted: 10 Apr 2008, 04:06
by Poncey
Is Jeff's body even up for it?!
There should be a law for all commissions that a fighter over x shouldn't be allowed to box.
Posted: 10 Apr 2008, 04:09
by DavidPayne
But how do you do that.
Hopkins is 43 and fit as a flea.
They should allowed to box if they pass medicals. The trick is, not to watch.
Posted: 10 Apr 2008, 04:19
by Poncey
Honestly, I have no idea, but if the trend continues to increase of fighters being allowed to box in their late fourties, someone's gonna get seriously hurt.
Then we have The Daily Mail brigade saying how barbaric boxing is, yadda, yadda, yadda.
Personally, I think a boxer should have any licence refused/withdrawn on their 45th birthday.
Posted: 10 Apr 2008, 04:49
by TerribleTerry
NO!
Two greats, out to sully their reputations. I hope it falls through.
I loved their first fight - Fenech was full of piss and vinegar (as per usual..)
Posted: 10 Apr 2008, 04:57
by Autobarn
In the 1st fight, Fenech gave one of the greatest performances of a foreign fighter in America. He won clearly in an exciting fight, but he never got over the draw verdict.
He obviously badly needs the money as well. Fenech had so many great nights, he must've made loads of money fighting in Australia in world title fight after world title fight, so it is doubly sad to see this.
Posted: 10 Apr 2008, 05:40
by Sweet P
Autobarn wrote:In the 1st fight, Fenech gave one of the greatest performances of a foreign fighter in America. He won clearly in an exciting fight, but he never got over the draw verdict.
He obviously badly needs the money as well. Fenech had so many great nights, he must've made loads of money fighting in Australia in world title fight after world title fight, so it is doubly sad to see this.
I agree Fenech never got over that robbery. He looked a diffrent fighter in there rematch. Ive heard he had a rib injury from sparring the very young Kostya Tszyu, but Fenech himself has never said anything about the injury. Fenech claimed that it took something away from him being robbed and in the rematch he thought it would be easy and never trained as he should have.
I personally think its not smart fighting at there age's but Id rather watch this fight than Mundine Soliman 3.
Posted: 10 Apr 2008, 07:45
by bennie
Nelson was recovering from malaria first time; second time, he mashed the mauler; third time, we're all a helluva lot older.
Posted: 10 Apr 2008, 07:46
by Poncey
Will they be given Ovaltine instead of water between rounds?
Posted: 10 Apr 2008, 09:42
by Old bones Ian
Wasn't Nelson v Fenech II shown on ITV on a Sunday morning? oh those happy days.
Posted: 10 Apr 2008, 09:57
by bennie
The rematch was one of those Ali-Foreman, Hagler-Sibson type moments when you knew beyond all doubt you were watching a great fighter (and I don't use the word 'great' lightly).
After the first fight, NOBODY tipped Nelson to smash Fenech in Oz.
Posted: 10 Apr 2008, 10:04
by jamesmcdonnell
I'll bet Nelson is still fit as a fiddle. From what I hear he's got plenty of money as well, and has invested in several businesses.
If anything, I would suggest he's doing Fenech a favour.
Posted: 12 Apr 2008, 20:30
by Sweet P
jamesmcdonnell wrote:I'll bet Nelson is still fit as a fiddle. From what I hear he's got plenty of money as well, and has invested in several businesses.
If anything, I would suggest he's doing Fenech a favour.
Fenech isnt in trouble with money, He has fight cards on every month on Foxtel here and makes plenty out of his gym Restruants etc. He said he was visiting Thailand and a wealthy businessman offered him 1 Mil to fight and he said it was to good to pass up.
Posted: 12 Apr 2008, 21:08
by Arbachakov
bennie wrote:The rematch was one of those Ali-Foreman, Hagler-Sibson type moments when you knew beyond all doubt you were watching a great fighter (and I don't use the word 'great' lightly).
After the first fight, NOBODY tipped Nelson to smash Fenech in Oz.
That bout wasn't really anything new for Nelson; he often needed two fights to be convincing against good fighters.
Men he should have been beating handily the first time around to justify his rep.Nelson of course had an excuse for every bad performance it seemed.
I can't think of any other touted great from that era that had as many off-nights.