Page 1 of 1
Wish the Calzah vs Hopkins fight was on ITV...
Posted: 17 Apr 2008, 18:35
by BAMBI
so much more hype and Support from our shores if ITV was showing it..oh well..!
Posted: 17 Apr 2008, 18:37
by STP
I don't.
It's a 36-year-old against a 43-year-old.
The general public shouldn't be exposed to these abnormalities. It's sick.
Posted: 17 Apr 2008, 18:43
by The Hawk
STP wrote:I don't.
It's a 36-year-old against a 43-year-old.
The general public shouldn't be exposed to these abnormalities. It's sick.
Its not their fault they are still at the top of their game at their ages, they have had plenty of fighters stand in their way to try and stop them, so as Hopkins said, its last man standing
Posted: 17 Apr 2008, 18:45
by STP
Still ill.
Posted: 17 Apr 2008, 19:25
by STP
Posted: 17 Apr 2008, 19:35
by BAMBI
Posted: 18 Apr 2008, 00:28
by chesh
STP wrote:I don't.
It's a 36-year-old against a 43-year-old.
The general public shouldn't be exposed to these abnormalities. It's sick.
Current Ring Magazine rankings:
B-Hop: No. 1 @ 175, no. 4 P4P
Joe C.: No. 1 @ 168, no. 5 P4P
Not bad for two "old" men!
Posted: 18 Apr 2008, 01:04
by STP
I wasn't being serious. It's not sick.
But Hoya's Ring Mag writers are the be all, end all?
Hopkins one of the five best boxers in the world despite not having fought since last July and losing two of his last four?
Posted: 18 Apr 2008, 01:39
by chesh
STP wrote:I wasn't being serious. It's not sick.
But Hoya's Ring Mag writers are the be all, end all?
Hopkins one of the five best boxers in the world despite not having fought since last July and losing two of his last four?
Hopkins' losses to Taylor were disputed and moving up two weight divisions to dominate the number one at 175 was pretty impressive.
I don't think there's any evidence that DLH's ownership of The Ring has in any way compromised its editorial integrity. Otherwise, Oscar himself might be P4P number 1, as, in the opinion of a significant minority, he should have got the decision over Floyd.
