Page 1 of 5

what is your all-time worst decision you've seen?

Posted: 17 May 2008, 19:00
by bjermaine
mine, probably has to be the first lewis-holyfield.

roy jones at the olympics is another.

has anyone on here seen the second schmeling-sharkey? how bad a decision was it? thanks!

Posted: 18 May 2008, 11:15
by Klee Gluckman
Emmauel Augustus v Burton
Fenech v Nelson 1
Hearns v Leonard 2

Posted: 18 May 2008, 15:00
by Seamus
Whitaker v Chavez
Tiberi v Toney
Coetzee v Snipes

Three horrible decisions.

Posted: 18 May 2008, 15:05
by jonp
Fenech Nelson has to be one of the worst iv seen altho David Barnes Jimmy Vincent was bad on a smaller scale.

Posted: 18 May 2008, 16:03
by loco misterio
JOSE MANTEQUILLA NAPOLES- ARMANDO MUÑIZ I.

Posted: 18 May 2008, 17:22
by Martin Sosa Cameron
Emile Griffith vs Jorge Fernandez I
Flash Elorde vs Vicente Derado
Ben Villaflor vs Victor Echegaray
Bob Foster vs Jorge Ahumada


:box:


msc

Re: what is your all-time worst decision you've seen?

Posted: 19 May 2008, 04:21
by p4p1
fenech - nelson 1 would be up there i wait to see how this next 'fight' between them will happen

Re: what is your all-time worst decision you've seen?

Posted: 19 May 2008, 11:28
by Smokin'Moe
i just woke up, so my mind is pretty fuzzy 8)
i dont know if its an all time worst decision but i score Hagler v. Leonard last nite 6 rounds hagler 4 rounds leonard with 2 even.....

Re: what is your all-time worst decision you've seen?

Posted: 19 May 2008, 13:03
by HomicideHenry
Hagler-Leonard

Re: what is your all-time worst decision you've seen?

Posted: 19 May 2008, 13:43
by enrique
Casamayor-Santa Cruz

Re:

Posted: 19 May 2008, 13:48
by granberry
Martin Sosa Cameron wrote:Emile Griffith vs Jorge Fernandez I
Flash Elorde vs Vicente Derado
Ben Villaflor vs Victor Echegaray
Bob Foster vs Jorge Ahumada


:box:


msc
The Foster-Ahumada decision was terrible.

Ahumada won the light heavyweight title and was robbed because he was not the home country fighter.

A pathetic and obvious example of crooked officiating.

Re: what is your all-time worst decision you've seen?

Posted: 19 May 2008, 15:30
by Martin Sosa Cameron
That decision was a shyness for boxing; and the first of Griffith vs Fernandez, a scandal...


:D


msc

Re: what is your all-time worst decision you've seen?

Posted: 19 May 2008, 16:07
by Jaybee From The Castle
bjermaine wrote:mine, probably has to be the first lewis-holyfield.

roy jones at the olympics is another.

has anyone on here seen the second schmeling-sharkey? how bad a decision was it? thanks!
Lewis - Holyfield 1 is mine too. Holy was never in serious danger of getting KO'ed, but I would have given him two rounds TOPS.

Re: what is your all-time worst decision you've seen?

Posted: 19 May 2008, 16:52
by granberry
Martin Sosa Cameron wrote:That decision was a shyness for boxing; and the first of Griffith vs Fernandez, a scandal...
:D
msc
Martin,

Can you tell me more about the Jorge Fernandez-Emile Griffith fights?

I never saw those.

Re: Re:

Posted: 19 May 2008, 18:01
by bjermaine
granberry wrote:
Martin Sosa Cameron wrote:Emile Griffith vs Jorge Fernandez I
Flash Elorde vs Vicente Derado
Ben Villaflor vs Victor Echegaray
Bob Foster vs Jorge Ahumada


:box:


msc
The Foster-Ahumada decision was terrible.

Ahumada won the light heavyweight title and was robbed because he was not the home country fighter.

A pathetic and obvious example of crooked officiating.
i never saw the foster fight but he himself has said in numerous interviews that he lost that fight. i've seen scores of some journalists who scored the fight 13-2 for ahumada. ahumada never became champ either. it makes me sick.

Re: what is your all-time worst decision you've seen?

Posted: 19 May 2008, 18:02
by bjermaine
Jaybee From The Castle wrote:
bjermaine wrote:mine, probably has to be the first lewis-holyfield.

roy jones at the olympics is another.

has anyone on here seen the second schmeling-sharkey? how bad a decision was it? thanks!
Lewis - Holyfield 1 is mine too. Holy was never in serious danger of getting KO'ed, but I would have given him two rounds TOPS.
exactly. i had the fight 10-2, lennox.

Re: what is your all-time worst decision you've seen?

Posted: 19 May 2008, 21:07
by HomicideHenry
Shulz-Foreman

Re: what is your all-time worst decision you've seen?

Posted: 19 May 2008, 21:26
by IKSRTFO
Byrd-Oquendo

Re: what is your all-time worst decision you've seen?

Posted: 20 May 2008, 08:06
by Poncey
Reid v Ottke.

Re: what is your all-time worst decision you've seen?

Posted: 20 May 2008, 10:25
by banjo
Whitaker v Ramirez 1

Re: what is your all-time worst decision you've seen?

Posted: 20 May 2008, 11:24
by giacomino
Antuofermo -Minter I.
Hatcher-Sacco I
Ottke-Brewer, Reid

Re: what is your all-time worst decision you've seen?

Posted: 20 May 2008, 11:42
by dempseyfire
Lewis-Holyfield I was bad but I wouldn't say it's the worst. Many of the rounds were dull with Lewis not landing much and Holyfield not doing anything except going forward. Especially considering it was scored a draw and not a Holyfield victory. I had it 8-4 Lennox

Some of the worst:

Burton-Augustus
Diamond-Huerta
Patterson-Maxim
Ali-Norton III (I can't understand those who say it was close)

Re: what is your all-time worst decision you've seen?

Posted: 20 May 2008, 18:12
by Goodnight, Irene
banjo wrote:Whitaker v Ramirez 1
Often overlooked, as a result of the more high-profile Whitaker-Chavez decision of '93. Good call, Banj. Whitaker won hands fucken down.

Re: what is your all-time worst decision you've seen?

Posted: 21 May 2008, 08:25
by banjo
Goodnight, Irene wrote:
banjo wrote:Whitaker v Ramirez 1
Often overlooked, as a result of the more high-profile Whitaker-Chavez decision of '93. Good call, Banj. Whitaker won hands fucken down.
I just can't understand what those judges saw to score it for Ramirez. It's definitely the worst decision that I have seen although there's probably worse out there.

Re: what is your all-time worst decision you've seen?

Posted: 21 May 2008, 15:43
by Martin Sosa Cameron
granberry wrote:
Martin Sosa Cameron wrote:That decision was a shyness for boxing; and the first of Griffith vs Fernandez, a scandal...
:D
msc
Martin,

Can you tell me more about the Jorge Fernandez-Emile Griffith fights?

I never saw those.

Jorge Fernandez was one of the greatest Argentinian fighters of all time; see his fabulous record in http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?hu ... &cat=boxer

In his first fight against Emile Griffith, June 3, 1960, N.Y.C., the crowd believed Fernandez was with ampleness the winner, but when they know the decision, absolutely unjust (referee: Petey Della 4-5 [Griffith], judge: Jack Gordon 4-5 [Griffith], judge: Joe Agnello 6-4 [Fernandez]), the attendance exploded protesting, and during more than 15 minutes, throwed a lot of "projectiles" to the ring: chairs, bottles, tin cans, stones and others, until the police stopped the hullaballo, but the decision wasn't changed



Another worst decision:

Masasi Kudo vs Manuel Gonzalez


msc