British title question and some thoughts.
Posted: 16 Jun 2008, 18:55
Sorry for the bizarre thread title.
Its just I have had a question posed to me in a pub a few weeks ago when trying to explain the situation about a fighter winning the belt outright, and the question completely stumped me. What happens if a fighter making the final defence to earn the belt outright gets a draw in the defence, does he get to keep the lonsdale belt outright?
Also in the line of recent stripping of the the title or reliquishing the belt, I was just wandering what would peoples opinion would be if the BBBoC awarded the belt (not outright obviously) to the #1 contender.... and his first DEFENCE would be against a BBBoC stipulated opponent.... maybe the opponent needing to win an eliminator first. Whilst, I don't like seeing belts not being won - I also don't like seeing an easy(ish) first notch for a fighter by facing an unworthy opponent for the vacant title.
Note: I don't think Meager vs Murray fits the bill, but Kell Brook's vacant title win (and first notch towards keeping it outright) wasn't against a guy deserving of a shot, I would say Oakey vs Spartacus was the same.
Any views on this?
Its just I have had a question posed to me in a pub a few weeks ago when trying to explain the situation about a fighter winning the belt outright, and the question completely stumped me. What happens if a fighter making the final defence to earn the belt outright gets a draw in the defence, does he get to keep the lonsdale belt outright?
Also in the line of recent stripping of the the title or reliquishing the belt, I was just wandering what would peoples opinion would be if the BBBoC awarded the belt (not outright obviously) to the #1 contender.... and his first DEFENCE would be against a BBBoC stipulated opponent.... maybe the opponent needing to win an eliminator first. Whilst, I don't like seeing belts not being won - I also don't like seeing an easy(ish) first notch for a fighter by facing an unworthy opponent for the vacant title.
Note: I don't think Meager vs Murray fits the bill, but Kell Brook's vacant title win (and first notch towards keeping it outright) wasn't against a guy deserving of a shot, I would say Oakey vs Spartacus was the same.
Any views on this?