Page 1 of 2
Dave Parris or wtahever his name is.
Posted: 18 Jul 2008, 18:00
by DG.
England's answer to Joe Cortez.
What a joke!
3 points taken off!
The low blow was NOT low.
The shove did not warrant a point!
A Point off because Williams had his elbow twisted???
Pathetic.
DP hates DW
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Re: Dave Parrish
Posted: 18 Jul 2008, 18:04
by johnty1888
jeez, he must have had a bet on McDermott
Re: Dave Parrish
Posted: 18 Jul 2008, 18:04
by Asterix
I disagree.
Re: Dave Parrish
Posted: 18 Jul 2008, 18:06
by DG.
Re: Dave Parrish
Posted: 18 Jul 2008, 18:07
by hitman_hatton1
i've only just come in.
only saw the last 2 rds.
disagreed with those pt deductions though.
especially the one in the 12th.
williams has got it anyway.

Re: Dave Parrish
Posted: 18 Jul 2008, 18:08
by DG.
hitman_hatton1 wrote:i've only just come in.
only saw the last 2 rds.
disagreed with those pt deductions though.
especially the one in the 12th.
williams has got it anyway.

Dave Parrish is a class cuunt!
3 points and ALL for nothing!
Dave Parrish must have had a serious bet on this fight, you fat fcuking bald bastard!

Re: Dave Parrish
Posted: 18 Jul 2008, 18:11
by exittored
Parrish was terrible, 3 point deductions from Danny and they were alll totally wrong and what the feck was Jim Watt watching giving J mac last 2 rounds???
Glad Danny won though, not a good performance but apart from 1st and 5th, i think he won every other round
Re: Dave Parrish
Posted: 18 Jul 2008, 18:13
by hitman_hatton1
DG. wrote:hitman_hatton1 wrote:i've only just come in.
only saw the last 2 rds.
disagreed with those pt deductions though.
especially the one in the 12th.
williams has got it anyway.

Dave Parrish is a class cuunt!
3 points and ALL for nothing!
Dave Parrish must have had a serious bet on this fight, you fat fcuking bald bastard!

yeah all 3 looked wrong.
i'm a little worse for wear leek.
but they looked wrong.
unless danny had been dirty all night or something.

Re: Dave Parrish
Posted: 18 Jul 2008, 18:16
by DG.
hitman_hatton1 wrote:DG. wrote:hitman_hatton1 wrote:i've only just come in.
only saw the last 2 rds.
disagreed with those pt deductions though.
especially the one in the 12th.
williams has got it anyway.

Dave Parrish is a class cuunt!
3 points and ALL for nothing!
Dave Parrish must have had a serious bet on this fight, you fat fcuking bald bastard!

yeah all 3 looked wrong.
i'm a little worse for wear leek.
but they looked wrong.
unless danny had been dirty all night or something.

Parrish should be banned!
Mcdermott did not WIN this fight.
Those 3 points were a joke.
BUT... DW won!
Fcuk you DP!
WTF is Johnny Nelsson talking about?
Someone get Carlos De leon on the phone!
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Re: Dave Parrish
Posted: 18 Jul 2008, 18:17
by The_Don1
looking at the replays 2 out of 3 point deductions were correct, the one for pushing was harsh tho
Re: Dave Parrish
Posted: 18 Jul 2008, 18:19
by DG.
The_Don1 wrote:looking at the replays 2 out of 3 point deductions were correct, the one for pushing was harsh tho
The last point Mcdermott was holding and trapped DWs arm, the pain made him open his mouth.
P is a total dirty bent crooked ref..allegedly of course!
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Re: Dave Parrish
Posted: 18 Jul 2008, 18:20
by The_Don1
DG. wrote:The_Don1 wrote:looking at the replays 2 out of 3 point deductions were correct, the one for pushing was harsh tho
The last point Mcdermott was holding and trapped DWs arm, the pain made him open his mouth.
P is a total dirty bent crooked ref..allegedly of course!
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
what the raaas? DW straight spat his shield out!
Re: Dave Parrish
Posted: 18 Jul 2008, 18:21
by exittored
What u talking about, the body shots were fine plus j mac shud have been one to get penalised for holding in the 12th
Re: Dave Parrish
Posted: 18 Jul 2008, 18:22
by The_Don1
exittored wrote:What u talking about, the body shots were fine plus j mac shud have been one to get penalised for holding in the 12th
yeah - if you count the crotch area as a part of the body!
Re: Dave Parrish
Posted: 18 Jul 2008, 19:21
by 1southpaw
i thought the ruling was 3 points and your out if so what happened ???
Re: Dave Parrish
Posted: 18 Jul 2008, 19:27
by jonny
DG. wrote:The_Don1 wrote:looking at the replays 2 out of 3 point deductions were correct, the one for pushing was harsh tho
The last point Mcdermott was holding and trapped DWs arm, the pain made him open his mouth.
P is a total dirty bent crooked ref..allegedly of course!
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Not good tonight from Parris, can half go with the first 2 deductions but the third no way, McDermott was giving it large
Re: Dave Parrish
Posted: 18 Jul 2008, 22:26
by BigEars
1southpaw wrote:i thought the ruling was 3 points and your out if so what happened ???
That's normally for the same offence, and it's not an official rule either, just how things generally go .
Re: Dave Parrish
Posted: 19 Jul 2008, 00:13
by lefthook82
Isnt he the ref that incorrectly awarded a fight between Williams and Sprott in Sprott's favour when even Michael knew he hadn't won the fight
Maybe he doesnt like Williams
Re: Dave Parrish
Posted: 19 Jul 2008, 01:15
by SticknMove
Application of rules appears to be a subjective.
If Parris had warned Williams about the low blows throughout the fight then a point has to be deducted - we were not privy to what the guy said. If a gumshield comes out once, twice or 3 times (is that thrice) then it is imcumbent on the ref to apply a rule - thus another point deducted. The other point deduction was just plain stupid IMO - a harsh warning would have been enough.
The holding from McDermott is par for the course for HWs. Being on the back foot delivering clean but ineffective shots shouldn't discount his efforts either. I am in more agreement with the commentary team than some of the shite on here tbh.
Re: Dave Parrish
Posted: 19 Jul 2008, 01:40
by funso banjo baby
its the commentay that pisses me off
jim watt is looking at the reply of not a single low blow and says 'this is clumsy from williams'
those commentators were wankrs
the ref was a tit who should retire
danny survives another case of corruption and survives
go danny

somebody up there likes him
Re: Dave Parrish
Posted: 19 Jul 2008, 02:24
by SticknMove
funso banjo baby wrote:its the commentay that pisses me off
jim watt is looking at the reply of not a single low blow and says 'this is clumsy from williams'
those commentators were wankrs
the ref was a tit who should retire
danny survives another case of corruption and survives
go danny
somebody up there likes him
There are many down here that like him also.
It doesn't detract from the job that the ref has to do.
Danny has strayed low below the border many times in fights and his elbow/forearm in the face when close and pushing off appears unnoteworthy too. He's no angel. But interpret fights any way they grab you.
Re: Dave Parrish
Posted: 19 Jul 2008, 03:51
by chris s
Dave Parris was a disgrace but not as bad as Sky commentators making trying it out make out it was Dagenham's answer to The Rumble in the Jungle. I thought the fight was rubbish.
Re: Dave Parrish
Posted: 19 Jul 2008, 04:31
by Autobarn
I think any British heavyweight fight that doesn't end early is generally very bad.
Apart from an immediate rematch, you'd think there would be nothing for McDermott after fighting like that. He would have to go on the German tour so that Easrern European heavyweights use him as a stepping stone.
Re: Dave Parrish
Posted: 19 Jul 2008, 05:20
by chris s
I don't see what grounds there are for a rematch. It was a crap fight and Danny won at least 8 rounds.
If it wasn't for Sky's dire commentary and the ref losing the plot there would be no arguments
Re: Dave Parrish
Posted: 19 Jul 2008, 09:10
by chesh
Terry D wrote:Should have lost a point for the shield, none for the low blow, and the elbow was hardly anything.
Is it me or is that the most entertainly shit fight I've seen for a while?
I know what you mean, Terry. Appalling, but somehow riveting at the same time.