Page 1 of 1
Re: Interesting Undercard at the MEN on 6/9/08
Posted: 21 Jul 2008, 09:51
by Dioufy
Has Smith got another shot at Bendall then? If so then another defeat will be bad news.
Re: Interesting Undercard at the MEN on 6/9/08
Posted: 21 Jul 2008, 09:54
by Coco
teddy007 wrote:Steven Bendel Vs Paul Smith
Derry Matthews Vs Stephen Bell
Femi Fehintola Vs Stephen Foster Jnr
Who do you see winning these? Mine are Smith, Matthews and Foster Jnr.
I agree, this is on a SN bill yeah? Who is headlining?
Re: Interesting Undercard at the MEN on 6/9/08
Posted: 21 Jul 2008, 09:55
by Dioufy
Amir Khan vs TBA
Alex Arthur vs Nicky Cook (AAA's first defence)
Enzo Maccarinelli vs TBA (WBO title fight)
Re: Interesting Undercard at the MEN on 6/9/08
Posted: 21 Jul 2008, 09:56
by chesh
Sky Box Office???
Re: Interesting Undercard at the MEN on 6/9/08
Posted: 21 Jul 2008, 09:57
by Coco
All competitive fights in fairness, very un SN like!
I wonder if the change is coming from the pressure from the tv networks
Re: Interesting Undercard at the MEN on 6/9/08
Posted: 21 Jul 2008, 10:08
by chesh
Coco wrote:All competitive fights in fairness, very un SN like!
I wonder if the change is coming from the pressure from the tv networks
Or, as I asked above, because it's going to be on PPV at about £15.99??
Re: Interesting Undercard at the MEN on 6/9/08
Posted: 21 Jul 2008, 10:10
by Dioufy
I hope it's not... unless Khan steps up against a natural top 15 lightweight.
Re: Interesting Undercard at the MEN on 6/9/08
Posted: 21 Jul 2008, 10:10
by DG.
chesh wrote:Sky Box Office???
Better not be - I won't buy it.
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Re: Interesting Undercard at the MEN on 6/9/08
Posted: 21 Jul 2008, 10:23
by lefthook82
OFF TOPIC-ISH
To me there are three kinds of PPVs
1. The one that doesnt need advertising, you just need to be told where to pay the money( e.g. Mayweather v Hatton)
2. The one where you could take or leave. Buying is a direct result of how much hype the adverts can generate in you
3. The one you wouldnt pay for even if your life depended on it
This one would firmly be number 3 for me, although Amir fighting a legitamate threat would push it up to number 2 and then it would be up to the adverts to convince me to cough up
ON/TOPIC
As for chesh's question, I do not beleive this would be PPV. It could in no way be justified!
Re: Interesting Undercard at the MEN on 6/9/08
Posted: 21 Jul 2008, 13:10
by sweetscience
lets see what the bill looks like a week before
i doubt all these will go through
Re: Interesting Undercard at the MEN on 6/9/08
Posted: 21 Jul 2008, 13:28
by lefthook82
a week is a long time in boxing @sweetscience.
If on the day everything is good then I will be pleased
Re: Interesting Undercard at the MEN on 6/9/08
Posted: 21 Jul 2008, 13:42
by rhino222
long time since warren had 3 quality fights on a card, the last one was the full monty 2 i think, paul ingles tragic nite, therefore, i doubt the bill will contain these 3 'show' fights !!!
Re: Interesting Undercard at the MEN on 6/9/08
Posted: 21 Jul 2008, 13:47
by Horse
Is Derry Mathews vs Stephen Bell for the English title? I don't see why it shouldn't be.
Re: Interesting Undercard at the MEN on 6/9/08
Posted: 23 Jul 2008, 01:06
by oliverfennell
rhino222 wrote:long time since warren had 3 quality fights on a card, the last one was the full monty 2 i think, paul ingles tragic nite, therefore, i doubt the bill will contain these 3 'show' fights !!!
12 months ago:
Nicky Cook v Steve Luevano
Matt Skelton v Michael Sprott 2
Amir Khan v Willie Limond
Anthony Small v Bradley Pryce
Re: Interesting Undercard at the MEN on 6/9/08
Posted: 23 Jul 2008, 03:42
by Tykemania
Coco wrote:All competitive fights in fairness, very un SN like!
I wonder if the change is coming from the pressure from the tv networks
You're right - TBN is comfortably Khan's most competitive opponent yet!
Re: Interesting Undercard at the MEN on 6/9/08
Posted: 23 Jul 2008, 07:21
by steve689
I heard Enzo Mac is fighting Alexeev for the WBO? Doubt it though as Alexeev looks way too good an opponent for the job. In fact from what i have seen of the Russian i would make him the favourite.
Re: Interesting Undercard at the MEN on 6/9/08
Posted: 23 Jul 2008, 07:30
by oliverfennell
Wasn't Audley v Rogan supposed to be on this bill too?
Re: Interesting Undercard at the MEN on 6/9/08
Posted: 23 Jul 2008, 07:31
by Gray-Fox
oliverfennell wrote:Wasn't Audley v Rogan supposed to be on this bill too?
Yes.
Re: Interesting Undercard at the MEN on 6/9/08
Posted: 23 Jul 2008, 07:41
by oliverfennell
care to elaborate?
Re: Interesting Undercard at the MEN on 6/9/08
Posted: 23 Jul 2008, 09:54
by Gray-Fox
Well I don't know if it still is!!! All I know is it was supposed to be.
Re: Interesting Undercard at the MEN on 6/9/08
Posted: 25 Jul 2008, 17:29
by Max Molyneux
chesh wrote:Sky Box Office???
He hasn't Setanta has he or are you guys making up stuff because of the canceled Audley TV date?
Re: Interesting Undercard at the MEN on 6/9/08
Posted: 25 Jul 2008, 18:22
by WildWaylon
Coco wrote:All competitive fights in fairness, very un SN like!
I wonder if the change is coming from the pressure from the tv networks
Competitive fights!!!! Amir Kahn and Macca v TBA. Lets see who they are fighting. Yep the others look pretty good.
Re: Interesting Undercard at the MEN on 6/9/08
Posted: 25 Jul 2008, 18:23
by Coco
WildWaylon wrote:Coco wrote:All competitive fights in fairness, very un SN like!
I wonder if the change is coming from the pressure from the tv networks
Competitive fights!!!! Amir Kahn and Macca v TBA. Lets see who they are fighting. Yep the others look pretty good.
I was referring to the 3 fights Teddy put down