BoxRec

That would sell out MSG in ten minutes...

Quarry probably outboxes both of them.

If Klitschko had trouble figuring out the pitiful Brock, he'd be in a heap of trouble with Quarry.

Quarry was tough and physically fit, and those are qualities you that many modern heavyweights don't possess.

Quarry would just walk through Wlad. The pace and punch power when he was boxing Frazier thefirst time was so intense Wlad would implode quick time.

Vitali is so dififcult it wouldn't be such an easy fight, but i have no doubt JQ would outbox and outpoint him. Vitali had his hands full a faded and overweight guy like Sanders, cant see him coping with a natural fighter like Jerry.

Im not looking at Jerry with rose tinted specs in anyway, a simple viewing of his best fights shows hes better than these boys in every department.

Jerry had no problems with big guys who stalled around. Ask Mac Foster. You had to be stronger,but work hard to beat Jerry. Quarry would see the "deer in the headlights" with these two guys and he'd get more tenacious as the fight went on. He Ko's both.

Quarry is to small for either, He would have a chance against Wlad as his chin isnt good, He couldnt out point or KO Vitali and would get beaten and most probably stopped. IMO.

To many guys with rose coloured glasses.

Just think of all the disadvantages he would have to overcome.

Quarry even at 200 lbs battered and knocked out big 250 lb guys.

To say he would be 'too small' is to ignore sooo many fights throughout boxing history, even someone like you who obviously doesnt have much grasp of boxing must remember a 6'0 and 220lb (and fleshy even at that weight) Ruslan Chagaev easily potshotting and outboxing a 320 lb and 7' tall Nikolay Valuev?

How come Ruslan wasn't 'too small' for a man with such monstrous advantages?

(Because his skills neutralised Valuev's size)

overhand_right wrote:Quarry even at 200 lbs battered and knocked out big 250 lb guys.

To say he would be 'too small' is to ignore sooo many fights throughout boxing history, even someone like you who obviously doesnt have much grasp of boxing must remember a 6'0 and 220lb (and fleshy even at that weight) Ruslan Chagaev easily potshotting and outboxing a 320 lb and 7' tall Nikolay Valuev?

How come Ruslan wasn't 'too small' for a man with such monstrous advantages?

(Because his skills neutralised Valuev's size)

Comparing Valuev and Either Klitshko is stupid, Its not the size diffrence its the fact that both Klitshkos can fight and have a size advantage.

If you think the Klitschko brothers can fight then you should probably go away and learn about boxing.