Page 1 of 1

Terry O'Connor

Posted: 07 Sep 2008, 12:36
by sweetscience
is it me or does he look like Peter of Family Guy

Image

Image

Re: Terry O'Connor

Posted: 07 Sep 2008, 12:50
by Twinkle Toes
He's a terrible ref, from the Manfredo stoppage to Khan last night.

Ridiculous.

Re: Terry O'Connor

Posted: 07 Sep 2008, 13:00
by EddieShredder
I'd probably have more faith in Griffin.

Re: Terry O'Connor

Posted: 07 Sep 2008, 13:03
by Exoddus
He can't score fights either. Look at his 114-115 on the Arthur fight. What was he doing? Watching Family Guy?

Re: Terry O'Connor

Posted: 07 Sep 2008, 13:22
by jamesmcdonnell
I would love to hear his justification for letting Khan, who couldn't even stand still in one spot his legs were so rubberised, walk back into a barrage of punches against a guy who decked him with the first shot he landed.

Absolutely disgusting refereeing, and agreed, his scoring of the Arthur fight was pretty shocking. Arthur lost the first three outright, and did little or nothing the last three rounds. So that is six rounds to Cook straight away so how can Arthur have lost by only one round?

Re: Terry O'Connor

Posted: 07 Sep 2008, 13:34
by WildWaylon
jamesmcdonnell wrote:I would love to hear his justification for letting Khan, who couldn't even stand still in one spot his legs were so rubberised, walk back into a barrage of punches against a guy who decked him with the first shot he landed.

Absolutely disgusting refereeing, and agreed, his scoring of the Arthur fight was pretty shocking. Arthur lost the first three outright, and did little or nothing the last three rounds. So that is six rounds to Cook straight away so how can Arthur have lost by only one round?
He was hoping Khan could come back as he did before in other fights, but you could see Khan was finished. I dont think he wanted to contribute to Khans first loss so he let it go on. He wouldnt have been very popular if he had stopped it. Khan and others would have said he was OK and ready to turn the fight around.

Re: Terry O'Connor

Posted: 07 Sep 2008, 13:38
by jamesmcdonnell
It is not the referee's job to be popular, or support a fighters career.

Re: Terry O'Connor

Posted: 07 Sep 2008, 13:43
by JC
jamesmcdonnell wrote:It is not the referee's job to be popular, or support a fighters career.
Yup, fighter's safety must come first, end of.

Re: Terry O'Connor

Posted: 07 Sep 2008, 13:43
by deadpan
He should be suspended. It would send out a message. When you compare the Manfredo and Khan stoppages he's guilty as charged.

Alas this is all too common in British rings. All this 'you have to knock them out to get a draw' in Italy and Germany hocus applies just as much in the UK.

Re: Terry O'Connor

Posted: 07 Sep 2008, 14:21
by EddieShredder
Terry O'Connor seen here giving Bradshaw the benefit of the doubt :TU:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WnskujvT ... re=related

It was the first round, so it's ok :D

Re: Terry O'Connor

Posted: 07 Sep 2008, 14:32
by stujones
And worst of all.... the fatty blocked the view of Frank's face when Khan went tumbling.

Re: Terry O'Connor

Posted: 07 Sep 2008, 14:49
by THEBUTCH
If O'Connor had stopped it after the first knockdown, every member of the Khan camp would have been screaming blue murder, so I am least grateful we don't have to listen such rubbish from Team Khan.

O'Connor has some made some poor calls in his time and this one was no exception.

Re: Terry O'Connor

Posted: 07 Sep 2008, 14:54
by WildWaylon
jamesmcdonnell wrote:It is not the referee's job to be popular, or support a fighters career.
I agree entirely but these thoughts must have gone through his mind.

Re: Terry O'Connor

Posted: 07 Sep 2008, 16:15
by Dioufy
The fight should've been waved off after that second hook exploded on Khan's chops. It was actually futile counting because Khan was never ever going to stand up, and if he did, his legs would've buckled under his won weight anyways. I feel sorry for him as he is a nice kid, but that chin is ridiculous. Now imagine if Pacquiao was standing in the other corner instead of Prescott - I imagine there would be a "RIP Amir Khan" thread knocking around instead of this one. Back to fighting featherweights.

Re: Terry O'Connor

Posted: 07 Sep 2008, 18:15
by stujones
Actually would like to see Warren's reaction..... when can was all over the place he was talking quite cooly to his mate who is always next to him.

Re: Terry O'Connor

Posted: 07 Sep 2008, 18:40
by whiskey
Khan was never gonna be stopped on his feet, especially after the fact he visits the canvas during every fight.

Imagine the debate surrounding the fight if he had done, from the pro-Khan brigade.

I think he did everyone a favour by letting the fight conclude itself.

KO1

Re: Terry O'Connor

Posted: 07 Sep 2008, 18:45
by SticknMove
I think only giving 115-114 to Cook is more controversial. :TU:

Re: Terry O'Connor

Posted: 08 Sep 2008, 05:42
by Lenny
SticknMove wrote:I think only giving 115-114 to Cook is more controversial. :TU:
I agree although i'm not sure of too many other fighters in the world who would have received the full 10 count on the second knockdown as Amir was. If he had somehow got to his feet i'm sure he would have been sent out again.

Re: Terry O'Connor

Posted: 08 Sep 2008, 06:20
by deadpan
I think you're right Lenny, he would've been allowed to carry on. Quite how that would've served Khan's best interests is beyond me.

A man's future well being should take precedent over the short term wishes of a promoter and the brittle ego of a referee.