Page 1 of 1

WHOS BETTER NOW? AMIR OR AUDLEY?

Posted: 09 Sep 2008, 07:11
by overhand_right
There must be a lot of shocked rude boys out in Bolton right now.

What a surprise, that diet of featherweight stiffs didn't teach Amir a single thing, and he got blown away by a crude wild swinger. A great way to open up his 20 fight Sky Box Office deal!!

Well, i'll take a SD loss to Danny Williams over a 50 second icing.

The problem isn't match making, the problem is the faulty product. It has no chin.

Whos better now? I assume people still hate Audley enough to side with Amir.

Re: WHOS BETTER NOW? AMIR OR AUDLEY?

Posted: 09 Sep 2008, 07:24
by scotty
Better for entertainment is Khan, A-Farce bores me to tears normally, the only notable exception was when he got felled by Sprotty.

Lb for Lb probably give it to Khan aswell.

Re: WHOS BETTER NOW? AMIR OR AUDLEY?

Posted: 09 Sep 2008, 08:09
by Captain Hook
Simple - Amir Khan.

Why the fornicate would anyone say Harrison instead? If we're talking about boxing and nothing else - KHAN.

Re: WHOS BETTER NOW? AMIR OR AUDLEY?

Posted: 09 Sep 2008, 08:11
by overhand_right
Because Audley would of been stretched in rd 1 by Danny Williams and Dominic Guinn and climb off the floor to beat Julius Francis if he were Amir?

Re: WHOS BETTER NOW? AMIR OR AUDLEY?

Posted: 09 Sep 2008, 08:40
by Captain Hook
Sprott?

Re: WHOS BETTER NOW? AMIR OR AUDLEY?

Posted: 09 Sep 2008, 08:40
by Captain Hook
PS My sister would climb off the floor to beat Francis :)

Re: WHOS BETTER NOW? AMIR OR AUDLEY?

Posted: 09 Sep 2008, 11:39
by oliverfennell
Sure, a split-decision loss to Danny Williams is pound-for-pound more credible than KO1 loss to Breidis Prescott, but the fact is Khan has won and defended a major championship, which Harrison hasn't. It's nothing to do with hate... I used to work with Audley, so of course I support him. But them's the facts, and in this sport results count more than wouldas or shouldas.

Re: WHOS BETTER NOW? AMIR OR AUDLEY?

Posted: 09 Sep 2008, 11:43
by stujones
Khan!

Khan might be chinny, but he's got heart and he can fight. Khan will always be exiting.

Audley can't.

Re: WHOS BETTER NOW? AMIR OR AUDLEY?

Posted: 09 Sep 2008, 12:23
by Punchy Joe
Amir is better, at least he wants to fight when he gets in their............

Re: WHOS BETTER NOW? AMIR OR AUDLEY?

Posted: 09 Sep 2008, 12:35
by overhand_right
If it was an excitement contest, Amir wins it no doubt.

Journeymen like Vinny Maddalone are more exciting than Tony Thompson, but Thompson is going to win whereas Maddlone is going to get starched etc.

Re: WHOS BETTER NOW? AMIR OR AUDLEY?

Posted: 09 Sep 2008, 13:12
by snoopyboymason
Khan gets knocked out and suddenly he's a joke he's a world class talent who's punch resistance is poor he still a baby he will be back

Re: WHOS BETTER NOW? AMIR OR AUDLEY?

Posted: 09 Sep 2008, 16:29
by WildWaylon
Stupid Question Khan does go in to fight. Perhaps Khan needs to take the middle ground. Neither too keen or too careful.

Re: WHOS BETTER NOW? AMIR OR AUDLEY?

Posted: 09 Sep 2008, 16:31
by terminator
overhand_right wrote:There must be a lot of shocked rude boys out in Bolton right now.

I'm sure there are some happy chavs right now :TU:

Re: WHOS BETTER NOW? AMIR OR AUDLEY?

Posted: 09 Sep 2008, 18:11
by Rob Magic
Kahn was exciting. You might find he might of gone all gun shy after that confidence shattering loss :(

Re: WHOS BETTER NOW? AMIR OR AUDLEY?

Posted: 09 Sep 2008, 18:50
by Asterix
Rob Magic wrote:Kahn was exciting. You might find he might of gone all gun shy after that confidence shattering loss :(
Like Khan vs St Clair. That's the only Khan fight I can think of that I found a bit boring.

Re: WHOS BETTER NOW? AMIR OR AUDLEY?

Posted: 10 Sep 2008, 06:56
by Captain Hook
Asterix wrote:
Rob Magic wrote:Kahn was exciting. You might find he might of gone all gun shy after that confidence shattering loss :(
Like Khan vs St Clair. That's the only Khan fight I can think of that I found a bit boring.

Fantastic performance against a good opponent. I hope he comes back stronger.

Re: WHOS BETTER NOW? AMIR OR AUDLEY?

Posted: 10 Sep 2008, 07:59
by THEBUTCH
No contest thus far.

Being poleaxed by Sprott is worse IMO, than Breidis. At least Briedis is a recognised puncher.

khan's already achieved more in his 4 years as a pro. Audley has gone from bad to worse in his eight years.

Re: WHOS BETTER NOW? AMIR OR AUDLEY?

Posted: 10 Sep 2008, 08:13
by sharpei_louis
I echo what most have already said - Khan has an awful chin but at least he hasn't seemed to recognise it himself and to go in all guns blazing when you're prone to getting dropped yourself; all credit to him for being exciting if not world class.

Harrison is a joke, a huge mountain of a guy with real talent but absolutely no guts for a fight whatsoever.

Re: WHOS BETTER NOW? AMIR OR AUDLEY?

Posted: 10 Sep 2008, 09:01
by Goz
Khan has much better wins on his resume already than Harrison. Khan. Not even close.

Re: WHOS BETTER NOW? AMIR OR AUDLEY?

Posted: 10 Sep 2008, 09:15
by overhand_right
Tis funny how people didn't stand up a put a positive spin on Audley or Roman Greenbergs cataclysmic losses. They went straight to the Fistic Sh#t Heap!

Re: WHOS BETTER NOW? AMIR OR AUDLEY?

Posted: 10 Sep 2008, 09:39
by Goz
I think whatever you want to say about him, Khan has shown he wants to fight.

Greenberg & Harrison just never really looked like they wanted it.

Re: WHOS BETTER NOW? AMIR OR AUDLEY?

Posted: 10 Sep 2008, 10:59
by overhand_right
Good point.