BoxRec

for me its ryan rhodes he has got phenomenal hand speed and power what do you guys think?

Jamie Moore

Jamie Moore.

Jamie Moore definitly...

Moorsey

Jamie Moore.

J-Mo

prob jamie moore . Any news on a fight for him?

I'm a big fan of both Moore and Rhodes and think it would make for a great 50/50 fight (though realise it wouldn't get made in reality).
I think we have to include Small in the mix after his latest victory as well, while Pryce deserves a 'shout-out' as well.

Deserter wrote:I'm a big fan of both Moore and Rhodes and think it would make for a great 50/50 fight (though realise it wouldn't get made in reality).
I think we have to include Small in the mix after his latest victory as well, while Pryce deserves a 'shout-out' as well.

small is a chump, moorsey would destroy him

i think rhodes would beat moore i think he would stop him in mid rounds if rhodes can go 12 with lockett a big punching middleweight i dont think moore would trouble him were as i dont think moore could cope with rhodes power

sweetscience wrote:

Deserter wrote:I'm a big fan of both Moore and Rhodes and think it would make for a great 50/50 fight (though realise it wouldn't get made in reality).
I think we have to include Small in the mix after his latest victory as well, while Pryce deserves a 'shout-out' as well.

small is a chump, moorsey would destroy him

I'm no fan of Small but he can't be dismissed a chump, particularly in the light of the Curiel win. I'd favour Moore to beat him but it would be a tough fight and there's no way Moore would 'destroy' him.

Deserter wrote:

sweetscience wrote:

Deserter wrote:I'm a big fan of both Moore and Rhodes and think it would make for a great 50/50 fight (though realise it wouldn't get made in reality).
I think we have to include Small in the mix after his latest victory as well, while Pryce deserves a 'shout-out' as well.

small is a chump, moorsey would destroy him

I'm no fan of Small but he can't be dismissed a chump, particularly in the light of the Curiel win. I'd favour Moore to beat him but it would be a tough fight and there's no way Moore would 'destroy' him.

Thanks for spoiling the Small result, you arse.

Horse wrote:Thanks for spoiling the Small result, you arse.

Fella, for starters it's already elsewhere on the forum and as many others have pointed out on other threads recently, in the online era it's unrealistic to expect to avoid the result - if you didn't want to know it until the delayed TV showing then avoid the forum, especially threads discussing something as specific as the British light-middleweight mix.. it isn't rocket science.
Oh, and nice touch with the 'arse' comment... classy.

Deserter wrote:Fella, for starters it's already elsewhere on the forum and as many others have pointed out on other threads recently, in the online era it's unrealistic to expect to avoid the result - if you didn't want to know it until the delayed TV showing then avoid the forum, especially threads discussing something as specific as the British light-middleweight mix.. it isn't rocket science.
Oh, and nice touch with the 'arse' comment... classy.

The other spoiler is in the Anthony Small thread isn't it? You should have had the decency to not have posted more spoilers in other threads. You should be ashamed of yourself, not making excuses.

Horse wrote:Thanks for spoiling the Small result, you arse.

That's very unfair, Horse. The onus is really on you to avoid visiting boxing websites/forums until you have watched the fight, if you really don't want to know the result. It's not like Deserter spoiled it for you on purpose.

Once I've got my cable box sorted this week, I'm going to be recording all of the big US fights (thank God I won't be staying up until 5 in the morning!). I definitely won't be coming on here until if I'm bothered about knowing the result.

Horse wrote:

Deserter wrote:Fella, for starters it's already elsewhere on the forum and as many others have pointed out on other threads recently, in the online era it's unrealistic to expect to avoid the result - if you didn't want to know it until the delayed TV showing then avoid the forum, especially threads discussing something as specific as the British light-middleweight mix.. it isn't rocket science.
Oh, and nice touch with the 'arse' comment... classy.

The other spoiler is in the Anthony Small thread isn't it? You should have had the decency to not have posted more spoilers in other threads. You should be ashamed of yourself, not making excuses.

Nonsense. I use a forum like boxrec, like many others do, because of its immediacy and the interaction it offers. In the light of the fact he fought on Friday how did it not cross your mind that Small would get mentioned in a thread entitled 'Who is the best British light middleweight'? It's completely unrealistic and why should I hold off on adding my comments purely because you're foolish enough to look at such a relevant thread.

Asterix wrote:

Horse wrote:Thanks for spoiling the Small result, you arse.

That's very unfair, Horse. The onus is really on you to avoid visiting boxing websites/forums until you have watched the fight, if you really don't want to know the result. It's not like Deserter spoiled it for you on purpose.

Once I've got my cable box sorted this week, I'm going to be recording all of the big US fights (thank God I won't be staying up until 5 in the morning!). I definitely won't be coming on here until if I'm bothered about knowing the result.

Cheers fella I'd never knowingly spoil a result for someone and this seemed a crazy one to get hauled up on.

Okay, I shouldn't have called you an arse, I apologise.

It is just that spoilers are a pet peeve of mine.

Horse wrote:

Deserter wrote:Fella, for starters it's already elsewhere on the forum and as many others have pointed out on other threads recently, in the online era it's unrealistic to expect to avoid the result - if you didn't want to know it until the delayed TV showing then avoid the forum, especially threads discussing something as specific as the British light-middleweight mix.. it isn't rocket science.
Oh, and nice touch with the 'arse' comment... classy.

The other spoiler is in the Anthony Small thread isn't it? You should have had the decency to not have posted more spoilers in other threads. You should be ashamed of yourself, not making excuses.

LOL - are you for real? If you don't want a spoiler, then WTF are you doing firstly logging onto a boxing forum, and secondly opening up a thread in relation to the light middleweight division?

Moore.

RYAN RHODES.........BEATS MOORE AND SMALL.....PRYCE IS A LIGHTWELTER FIGHTING AT LT MIDDLE COS HE IS LAZY AND HE IS OVERRATED

Horse wrote:Okay, I shouldn't have called you an arse, I apologise.

It is just that spoilers are a pet peeve of mine.

No worries fella . Apologies for spoiling your Monday night viewing but it certainly wasn't intentional.

Moore

Horse wrote:

Deserter wrote:Fella, for starters it's already elsewhere on the forum and as many others have pointed out on other threads recently, in the online era it's unrealistic to expect to avoid the result - if you didn't want to know it until the delayed TV showing then avoid the forum, especially threads discussing something as specific as the British light-middleweight mix.. it isn't rocket science.
Oh, and nice touch with the 'arse' comment... classy.

The other spoiler is in the Anthony Small thread isn't it? You should have had the decency to not have posted more spoilers in other threads. You should be ashamed of yourself, not making excuses.

Oh give him a break Horse you pompous sod . Ashamed of himself?!

Moore is the best British light-middle, no question.