Page 1 of 3
Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!
Posted: 09 Oct 2008, 16:38
by jameswilson
billy bessey wrote:JUST BEEN CHECKING OUT THE CLEVERLY OAKEY FIGHT ON PAPER THIS SEEMS A HALF DECENT MATCH UP BUT I DONT THINK IT WILL BE PRETTY TO WATCH AND TO BACK IT UP THERE IS AN ABSOLUTE PILE OF CRAP MATCH UPS ON THE UNDERCARD O.K THE HOME CORNER HAS SOME REAL GOOD PROSPECTS BUT THEIR OPPOSITION IS AWFUL. TAKE ALL OF THERE LAST 6 FIGHTS AND THE RECORD READS 5-43 THAT IS TERRIBLE IS IT NO WONDER THE GENERAL PUBLIC ARE TURNING TO M.M.A WHAT A LOAD OF SHIT I DONT KNOW HOW SKY LET HIM GET AWAY WITH IT ALL THE TIME I KNOW YOU NORMALLY GET A FEW MISMATCHES/BUILD UP/RECORD PADDING FIGHTS BUT THIS IS REALLY TAKING THE PEE AT LEAST WITH MALONEY/HENNESSEY YOU NORMALLY GET A FEW DECENT MATCH UPS SORT IT OUT FWANKY BOY NO WONDER YOU ARE LOSING YOUR GRIP YOU CAN FOOL SOME OF THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME ALL OF THE PEOPLE SOME OF THE TIME BUT NEVER ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME
What about some of the people some of the time?
Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!
Posted: 09 Oct 2008, 18:13
by rhino222
what about all of the people none of the time ?
Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!
Posted: 09 Oct 2008, 18:21
by Hagler2002
Expect a solicitors letter within the next 3 days.
Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!
Posted: 09 Oct 2008, 18:45
by bridportboxer
Hagler2002 wrote:Expect a solicitors letter within the next 3 days.
Problem is most of us could leave that sort of stuff and not be worried about getting such letters because it is unlikely (though not completely unheard of apparently) that a promoter would bother spending the time and money to find out who you are,
but Billy, you would have to be one of the easiests posters to find!
Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!
Posted: 09 Oct 2008, 18:45
by whiskey
Im with Billy on this.
Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!
Posted: 09 Oct 2008, 18:50
by jameswilson
Hagler2002 wrote:Expect a solicitors letter within the next 3 days.
It would be funny if me and Rhino got sued for taking the piss.
Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!
Posted: 09 Oct 2008, 20:12
by josh fg
Its a personal opinion, that the bill is bad its not making a statement about frank himself.
Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!
Posted: 09 Oct 2008, 20:13
by josh fg
josh fg wrote:Its a personal opinion, that the bill is bad its not making a statement about frank himself.
Oh and believe me Fwank can't afford to fcuk with my lawyers!
Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!
Posted: 09 Oct 2008, 20:15
by banjo
josh fg wrote:josh fg wrote:Its a personal opinion, that the bill is bad its not making a statement about frank himself.
Oh and believe me Fwank can't afford to fcuk with my lawyers!
Same here, nobody would fvck with my lawyers
D
Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!
Posted: 10 Oct 2008, 04:42
by Chambers2
Same Old shit, different bill
Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!
Posted: 10 Oct 2008, 04:54
by kickyoasshot
I've just found a preview of tonights bill. It has a detailed preview of the undercard too. The Smith brothers from Liverpool all appear on it. But all seem to be mismatches
http://diamondboxing.com/newsstory.php?list=4182
Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!
Posted: 10 Oct 2008, 07:27
by chinny
I noticed this a few days ago - nothing but red in the last six fights for the undercard opponents. May as well be sparring sessions.
The game needs to change. Thankfully we aren't dependent on one promoter anymore
Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!
Posted: 10 Oct 2008, 07:35
by bridportboxer
kickyoasshot wrote:I've just found a preview of tonights bill. It has a detailed preview of the undercard too. The Smith brothers from Liverpool all appear on it. But all seem to be mismatches
http://diamondboxing.com/newsstory.php?list=4182
sorry but,
You have mentioned this site in every post you've made thus far. You could be a bit more subtle.
Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!
Posted: 10 Oct 2008, 07:43
by kevin
kickyoasshot wrote:I've just found a preview of tonights bill. It has a detailed preview of the undercard too. The Smith brothers from Liverpool all appear on it. But all seem to be mismatches
http://diamondboxing.com/newsstory.php?list=4182
Are you Boxing Chats Brother?
"So in all this is looking to be a fantastic night of boxing for all involved and is well worth attending as it will be a great night hosted by Frank Warrens Sports Network. Additionally it will be a great event for the city of Liverpool with numerous local talent on show and some future world champions fighting tonight. It really is a miss it; miss out night of boxing."
I don't think Paul Smith is fighting now.
Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!
Posted: 10 Oct 2008, 08:13
by kickyoasshot
kevin wrote:kickyoasshot wrote:I've just found a preview of tonights bill. It has a detailed preview of the undercard too. The Smith brothers from Liverpool all appear on it. But all seem to be mismatches
http://diamondboxing.com/newsstory.php?list=4182
Are you Boxing Chats Brother?
"So in all this is looking to be a fantastic night of boxing for all involved and is well worth attending as it will be a great night hosted by Frank Warrens Sports Network. Additionally it will be a great event for the city of Liverpool with numerous local talent on show and some future world champions fighting tonight. It really is a miss it; miss out night of boxing."
I don't think Paul Smith is fighting now.
No I'm not mate. I don't know who Boxing chat is
Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!
Posted: 10 Oct 2008, 10:55
by charlieb
Spring, summer, autumn and winter.
Set a precedent and sue mother nature.
Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!
Posted: 10 Oct 2008, 11:00
by dondada
kickyoasshot wrote:I've just found a preview of tonights bill. It has a detailed preview of the undercard too. The Smith brothers from Liverpool all appear on it. But all seem to be mismatches
http://diamondboxing.com/newsstory.php?list=4182
You HAVE to be associated with that site. And are you trying to get SN creds or do you already have them?
One of the most boss-eyed, biased, puff pieces of utter shit I've ever laid my eyes on.
Read Bill's post then go and read that disgrace to internet journalism. Which is more accurate?
Some of us are trying to elevate the status of web writing. Santa Maria, I can't believe how bad that is.
Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!
Posted: 10 Oct 2008, 11:19
by 1southpaw
billy bessey wrote:JUST BEEN CHECKING OUT THE CLEVERLY OAKEY FIGHT ON PAPER THIS SEEMS A HALF DECENT MATCH UP BUT I DONT THINK IT WILL BE PRETTY TO WATCH AND TO BACK IT UP THERE IS AN ABSOLUTE PILE OF CRAP MATCH UPS ON THE UNDERCARD O.K THE HOME CORNER HAS SOME REAL GOOD PROSPECTS BUT THEIR OPPOSITION IS AWFUL. TAKE ALL OF THERE LAST 6 FIGHTS AND THE RECORD READS 5-43 THAT IS TERRIBLE IS IT NO WONDER THE GENERAL PUBLIC ARE TURNING TO M.M.A WHAT A LOAD OF SHIT I DONT KNOW HOW SKY LET HIM GET AWAY WITH IT ALL THE TIME I KNOW YOU NORMALLY GET A FEW MISMATCHES/BUILD UP/RECORD PADDING FIGHTS BUT THIS IS REALLY TAKING THE PEE AT LEAST WITH MALONEY/HENNESSEY YOU NORMALLY GET A FEW DECENT MATCH UPS SORT IT OUT FWANKY BOY NO WONDER YOU ARE LOSING YOUR GRIP YOU CAN FOOL SOME OF THE PEOPLE SOME OF THE TIME SOME OF THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME ALL OF THE PEOPLE SOME OF THE TIME BUT NEVER ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME
bill how can you call any boxer crap you need to look a bit closer to home mate
Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!
Posted: 10 Oct 2008, 11:41
by Counter-puncher
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:
One of the most boss-eyed, biased, puff pieces of utter shit I've ever laid my eyes on.
Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!
Posted: 10 Oct 2008, 11:59
by bridportboxer
1southpaw wrote:billy bessey wrote:JUST BEEN CHECKING OUT THE CLEVERLY OAKEY FIGHT ON PAPER THIS SEEMS A HALF DECENT MATCH UP BUT I DONT THINK IT WILL BE PRETTY TO WATCH AND TO BACK IT UP THERE IS AN ABSOLUTE PILE OF CRAP MATCH UPS ON THE UNDERCARD O.K THE HOME CORNER HAS SOME REAL GOOD PROSPECTS BUT THEIR OPPOSITION IS AWFUL. TAKE ALL OF THERE LAST 6 FIGHTS AND THE RECORD READS 5-43 THAT IS TERRIBLE IS IT NO WONDER THE GENERAL PUBLIC ARE TURNING TO M.M.A WHAT A LOAD OF SHIT I DONT KNOW HOW SKY LET HIM GET AWAY WITH IT ALL THE TIME I KNOW YOU NORMALLY GET A FEW MISMATCHES/BUILD UP/RECORD PADDING FIGHTS BUT THIS IS REALLY TAKING THE PEE AT LEAST WITH MALONEY/HENNESSEY YOU NORMALLY GET A FEW DECENT MATCH UPS SORT IT OUT FWANKY BOY NO WONDER YOU ARE LOSING YOUR GRIP YOU CAN FOOL SOME OF THE PEOPLE SOME OF THE TIME SOME OF THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME ALL OF THE PEOPLE SOME OF THE TIME BUT NEVER ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME
bill how can you call any boxer crap you need to look a bit closer to home mate
don't think he called any boxer crap, he said crap match ups, which they are.
Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!
Posted: 10 Oct 2008, 12:50
by WildWaylon
bridportboxer wrote:1southpaw wrote:billy bessey wrote:JUST BEEN CHECKING OUT THE CLEVERLY OAKEY FIGHT ON PAPER THIS SEEMS A HALF DECENT MATCH UP BUT I DONT THINK IT WILL BE PRETTY TO WATCH AND TO BACK IT UP THERE IS AN ABSOLUTE PILE OF CRAP MATCH UPS ON THE UNDERCARD O.K THE HOME CORNER HAS SOME REAL GOOD PROSPECTS BUT THEIR OPPOSITION IS AWFUL. TAKE ALL OF THERE LAST 6 FIGHTS AND THE RECORD READS 5-43 THAT IS TERRIBLE IS IT NO WONDER THE GENERAL PUBLIC ARE TURNING TO M.M.A WHAT A LOAD OF SHIT I DONT KNOW HOW SKY LET HIM GET AWAY WITH IT ALL THE TIME I KNOW YOU NORMALLY GET A FEW MISMATCHES/BUILD UP/RECORD PADDING FIGHTS BUT THIS IS REALLY TAKING THE PEE AT LEAST WITH MALONEY/HENNESSEY YOU NORMALLY GET A FEW DECENT MATCH UPS SORT IT OUT FWANKY BOY NO WONDER YOU ARE LOSING YOUR GRIP YOU CAN FOOL SOME OF THE PEOPLE SOME OF THE TIME SOME OF THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME ALL OF THE PEOPLE SOME OF THE TIME BUT NEVER ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME
bill how can you call any boxer crap you need to look a bit closer to home mate
don't think he called any boxer crap, he said crap match ups, which they are.
Thats true, Billy was only pointing out how the bill is full of one sided affairs which is fair comment. We should be free to have our say here, its a forum after all, but SN are sensitive about this issue of mismatches. The Khan/Prescott fight was supposed to be a mismatch but was promoted as a risky fight for Khan to take. As things turned out SN had dropped an enormous clanger and it really was a dangerous fight for Khan. We know most of the time the protected fighter will win but its great when things go wrong, it only takes one good punch etc etc and the points mean nothing. Anyway if they fcuk up and piss Sky off this time there will be nowhere for them to go.
Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!
Posted: 10 Oct 2008, 13:00
by REAL_DEAL
SN had decent bills when they were with ITV more than one fight you could of called a 50/50 but now back at SKY the quality has gone back to the WBU days. The burns bill a few week ago was so bad hardly anyone turned up this should be worrying as the Hall is often full the times i have been there. Maybe the fans are catching on.
Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!
Posted: 10 Oct 2008, 14:31
by DG.
Hagler2002 wrote:Expect a solicitors letter within the next 3 days.
It's already in the post!
Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!
Posted: 10 Oct 2008, 14:35
by DG.
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:kickyoasshot wrote:I've just found a preview of tonights bill. It has a detailed preview of the undercard too. The Smith brothers from Liverpool all appear on it. But all seem to be mismatches
http://diamondboxing.com/newsstory.php?list=4182
One of the most boss-eyed, biased, puff pieces of utter shit I've ever laid my eyes on.
Re: NOT A CLEVER BILL FWANK!!!!!!!
Posted: 10 Oct 2008, 15:36
by whicker
Possibly one of the least interesting undercards I have ever seen, and nowadays, that is saying something.