Page 1 of 1

Hopkins v Pavlik betting

Posted: 18 Oct 2008, 13:13
by Gray-Fox
Am I right on this one:

http://www.willhill.com/iibs/EN/buildco ... =BX2203846

That if I bet 100 quid on Pavlik and he wins I get 440 back?

Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting

Posted: 18 Oct 2008, 13:34
by BigEars
No, if you bet 100 on Pavlik you get 136.36 back or a profit of just £36.36

Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting

Posted: 18 Oct 2008, 13:35
by Gray-Fox
Ok thanks.

Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting

Posted: 18 Oct 2008, 14:59
by Dirk Kelly
I've got a £1 on a ko for Pavlik in every round. Come on Kelly.

Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting

Posted: 19 Oct 2008, 04:59
by Hagler2002
I can't believe I got 4/1 for Hopkins against an unprovern fighter, 10lbs out of his weight division and very one dimensional.

What was even more bizarre was the fact the bookies had Pavlik at a shorter price than when Calzaghe fought Hopkins.

Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting

Posted: 19 Oct 2008, 08:52
by Dirk Kelly
Hagler2002 wrote:I can't believe I got 4/1 for Hopkins against an unprovern fighter, 10lbs out of his weight division and very one dimensional.

What was even more bizarre was the fact the bookies had Pavlik at a shorter price than when Calzaghe fought Hopkins.
Who did you get that with? I always try and ensure that bet on both fighters to get at least my money back, William Hill had Hopkins at 2/1 so didn't think it was worth it, more the fool me!

Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting

Posted: 20 Oct 2008, 02:52
by Hagler2002
Dirk Kelly wrote:
Hagler2002 wrote:I can't believe I got 4/1 for Hopkins against an unprovern fighter, 10lbs out of his weight division and very one dimensional.

What was even more bizarre was the fact the bookies had Pavlik at a shorter price than when Calzaghe fought Hopkins.
Who did you get that with? I always try and ensure that bet on both fighters to get at least my money back, William Hill had Hopkins at 2/1 so didn't think it was worth it, more the fool me!
Got it on Betfair, he even went a shade bigger than 4/1 just before the off.

Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting

Posted: 20 Oct 2008, 04:56
by Dirk Kelly
Hagler2002 wrote:
Dirk Kelly wrote:
Hagler2002 wrote:I can't believe I got 4/1 for Hopkins against an unprovern fighter, 10lbs out of his weight division and very one dimensional.

What was even more bizarre was the fact the bookies had Pavlik at a shorter price than when Calzaghe fought Hopkins.
Who did you get that with? I always try and ensure that bet on both fighters to get at least my money back, William Hill had Hopkins at 2/1 so didn't think it was worth it, more the fool me!
Got it on Betfair, he even went a shade bigger than 4/1 just before the off.
Is Betfair the one where normal people post odds and people can post their bets with them? Do you always get your money back?

Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting

Posted: 20 Oct 2008, 05:51
by Poncey
Yeah, I checked on a betting comparison site and the best they had was 5/2 and 11/4.

Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting

Posted: 20 Oct 2008, 06:10
by Hagler2002
The best who had?

Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting

Posted: 20 Oct 2008, 06:12
by Poncey
betfinder

Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting

Posted: 20 Oct 2008, 06:16
by Hagler2002
I didn't exactly back Hopkins the book was running at 112% and I laid Pavlik @1.27 which also meant I got the draw so theoretically I did back Hopkins at 4/1.

If you backed him outright on Betfair it was a shade over 3/1 so the way to do it was lay Pavlik as the book was not at 100%

Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting

Posted: 20 Oct 2008, 08:54
by DavidPayne
I've got a Betfair account, free with Telegraph Fantasy Football.

And haven't got a scooby doo what to do with their odds setting.

Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting

Posted: 20 Oct 2008, 09:00
by Poncey
Me neither. I have absolutely no idea what Hagler is saying in His post. He could be speaking Georgian and it would make as much sense.

I really know nothing about gambling, except the number before the dash should be bigger than the number after to make it attractive. :oops:

Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting

Posted: 20 Oct 2008, 09:02
by toppity
Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Me neither. I have absolutely no idea what Hagler is saying in His post. He could be speaking Georgian and it would make as much sense.

I really know nothing about gambling, except the number before the dash should be bigger than the number after to make it attractive. :oops:
what makes you any different from those that do gamble :P