Page 1 of 1
Hopkins v Pavlik betting
Posted: 18 Oct 2008, 13:13
by Gray-Fox
Am I right on this one:
http://www.willhill.com/iibs/EN/buildco ... =BX2203846
That if I bet 100 quid on Pavlik and he wins I get 440 back?
Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting
Posted: 18 Oct 2008, 13:34
by BigEars
No, if you bet 100 on Pavlik you get 136.36 back or a profit of just £36.36
Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting
Posted: 18 Oct 2008, 13:35
by Gray-Fox
Ok thanks.
Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting
Posted: 18 Oct 2008, 14:59
by Dirk Kelly
I've got a £1 on a ko for Pavlik in every round. Come on Kelly.
Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting
Posted: 19 Oct 2008, 04:59
by Hagler2002
I can't believe I got 4/1 for Hopkins against an unprovern fighter, 10lbs out of his weight division and very one dimensional.
What was even more bizarre was the fact the bookies had Pavlik at a shorter price than when Calzaghe fought Hopkins.
Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting
Posted: 19 Oct 2008, 08:52
by Dirk Kelly
Hagler2002 wrote:I can't believe I got 4/1 for Hopkins against an unprovern fighter, 10lbs out of his weight division and very one dimensional.
What was even more bizarre was the fact the bookies had Pavlik at a shorter price than when Calzaghe fought Hopkins.
Who did you get that with? I always try and ensure that bet on both fighters to get at least my money back, William Hill had Hopkins at 2/1 so didn't think it was worth it, more the fool me!
Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting
Posted: 20 Oct 2008, 02:52
by Hagler2002
Dirk Kelly wrote:Hagler2002 wrote:I can't believe I got 4/1 for Hopkins against an unprovern fighter, 10lbs out of his weight division and very one dimensional.
What was even more bizarre was the fact the bookies had Pavlik at a shorter price than when Calzaghe fought Hopkins.
Who did you get that with? I always try and ensure that bet on both fighters to get at least my money back, William Hill had Hopkins at 2/1 so didn't think it was worth it, more the fool me!
Got it on Betfair, he even went a shade bigger than 4/1 just before the off.
Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting
Posted: 20 Oct 2008, 04:56
by Dirk Kelly
Hagler2002 wrote:Dirk Kelly wrote:Hagler2002 wrote:I can't believe I got 4/1 for Hopkins against an unprovern fighter, 10lbs out of his weight division and very one dimensional.
What was even more bizarre was the fact the bookies had Pavlik at a shorter price than when Calzaghe fought Hopkins.
Who did you get that with? I always try and ensure that bet on both fighters to get at least my money back, William Hill had Hopkins at 2/1 so didn't think it was worth it, more the fool me!
Got it on Betfair, he even went a shade bigger than 4/1 just before the off.
Is Betfair the one where normal people post odds and people can post their bets with them? Do you always get your money back?
Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting
Posted: 20 Oct 2008, 05:51
by Poncey
Yeah, I checked on a betting comparison site and the best they had was 5/2 and 11/4.
Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting
Posted: 20 Oct 2008, 06:10
by Hagler2002
The best who had?
Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting
Posted: 20 Oct 2008, 06:12
by Poncey
betfinder
Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting
Posted: 20 Oct 2008, 06:16
by Hagler2002
I didn't exactly back Hopkins the book was running at 112% and I laid Pavlik @1.27 which also meant I got the draw so theoretically I did back Hopkins at 4/1.
If you backed him outright on Betfair it was a shade over 3/1 so the way to do it was lay Pavlik as the book was not at 100%
Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting
Posted: 20 Oct 2008, 08:54
by DavidPayne
I've got a Betfair account, free with Telegraph Fantasy Football.
And haven't got a scooby doo what to do with their odds setting.
Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting
Posted: 20 Oct 2008, 09:00
by Poncey
Me neither. I have absolutely no idea what Hagler is saying in His post. He could be speaking Georgian and it would make as much sense.
I really know nothing about gambling, except the number before the dash should be bigger than the number after to make it attractive.

Re: Hopkins v Pavlik betting
Posted: 20 Oct 2008, 09:02
by toppity
Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Me neither. I have absolutely no idea what Hagler is saying in His post. He could be speaking Georgian and it would make as much sense.
I really know nothing about gambling, except the number before the dash should be bigger than the number after to make it attractive.

what makes you any different from those that do gamble :P