Page 1 of 1
fights you'd like to see in 2009 (but probably won't)
Posted: 03 Nov 2008, 16:25
by CCCC
guys
bit early for this one perhaps but still
Here's my list as a starter for 10, your thoughts?
Calzaghe v Froch
Mayweather v Margarito
Khan v Prescott (no way will he go near that guy again)
Witter v Hatton (I know both are not what they were, but I'd still like to see them get it on)
Vitali v Vladimir (just to make their mum cry!!!!!)
Thaxton v Khan
Berto v Williams
Lynes v Branco in England (so he can't get robbed)
Kevin Mitchell v Nicky Cook
Abraham v Pavlik (still the best two at middleweight)
Re: fights you'd like to see in 2009 (but probably won't)
Posted: 03 Nov 2008, 19:02
by deadpan
Vitali-Valuev
Witter-Hatton
Thaxton-Khan
Audley-Haye
Guzman-Valero
Froch-Kessler
Kimbo-Tyson
Morrissey-Mike Joyce
Vernon Kay-Bengal Tiger
Re: fights you'd like to see in 2009 (but probably won't)
Posted: 03 Nov 2008, 19:38
by WildWaylon
Superheavyweight wrote:Wladimir Klitschko vs. Audley Harrison
Joe Calzaghe vs. Bernard Hopkins II
Floyd Mayweather vs. Paul Williams
I read the first two and thought this guy needs serious help, the third is an OK fight I suppose.
Re: fights you'd like to see in 2009 (but probably won't)
Posted: 03 Nov 2008, 19:50
by WildWaylon
Calzaghe v Froch
Mayweather v Margarito
Macca v Alexeev
Witter v Hatton
Vitali or Vladimir v Haye
Murray v Khan
Berto v Williams
Lynes v Branco
Kevin Mitchell v Nicky Cook
Abraham v Pavlik
Subject to change after certain results.
Re: fights you'd like to see in 2009 (but probably won't)
Posted: 04 Nov 2008, 05:19
by DavidPayne
Olesugun v Lynes
Witter v Hatton - I wont quit on that.
Froch v Kessler
Bradley v Hatton
Margarito v Williams II - this bout really ought to happen.
Jennings v Cotto
Pryce v a top tenner.
Rees v Khan
Thaxton v Murray
Marquez v Pacman
Cook v Barrera
Re: fights you'd like to see in 2009 (but probably won't)
Posted: 04 Nov 2008, 05:32
by Lenny
Mayweather v Williams
Haye v Chagaev
Vitali v Valuev
Abraham v Pavlik
Moore v Forrest
Barker v Sylvester
Pacquiao v Guzman
De La Hoya v Kirkland
Kessler v Froch
Khan v Murray
Re: fights you'd like to see in 2009 (but probably won't)
Posted: 04 Nov 2008, 06:00
by Autobarn
Bernard Hopkins v Andre Berto at 170
Oscar de la Hoya v Ivan Calderon at 145-pound catchweight
Shane Mosley v Vic Darchinyan 141-pound catchweight
David Haye v Kelly Pavlik at 205
This is boxing isn't it, pick on smaller guy if it generates the money the money the money. When will viewers catch on re size mismatches, bloated elite fighters and catchweights for no championship.
And add Joe Calzaghe v Ricky Hatton why not for the money the money the money.
Re: fights you'd like to see in 2009 (but probably won't)
Posted: 04 Nov 2008, 07:12
by TheGoods
Hunter v Munroe
Hunter v Dunne
Hunter v Pickering II
Calzaghe v Froch
Margarito v De La Hoya
Re: fights you'd like to see in 2009 (but probably won't)
Posted: 04 Nov 2008, 07:27
by black panther
Froch-Kessler
Kessler-Bute
Napa-Arce
Jamie Moore-Verno Philips(Moore deserves a break man!)
Molitor/Cabellero winner vs Israel Vasquez
Israel Vasquez vs Juan Manuel Lopez
Pacquiao vs Guzman
Guzman vs Marquez
Guzman vs Campbell
Hatton vs Holt/Torres
De La hoya vs Margarito
Oh yeah and Froch-Inkin!

Re: fights you'd like to see in 2009 (but probably won't)
Posted: 04 Nov 2008, 09:50
by Poncey
Kessler v Taylor/Lacy
Berto v Cotto
Margarito v Moseley
Gamboa v Linares
Klitschko v Klitschko
Angulo/McEwan v Kirkland
Valero v John
Solis v Calderon
Judah v Hatton
Pavlik v Abraham
Dawson v Hopkins
Cunningham v Maccaranelli
Re: fights you'd like to see in 2009 (but probably won't)
Posted: 04 Nov 2008, 10:08
by oliverfennell
Superheavyweight wrote:
Joe Calzaghe vs. Bernard Hopkins II
Have you got jetlag?
Re: fights you'd like to see in 2009 (but probably won't)
Posted: 04 Nov 2008, 10:12
by oliverfennell
Zelenoff comeback
Re: fights you'd like to see in 2009 (but probably won't)
Posted: 04 Nov 2008, 10:12
by Poncey
oliverfennell wrote:Superheavyweight wrote:
Joe Calzaghe vs. Bernard Hopkins II
Have you got jetlag?
chief support; Skelton v Sprott 3.
Re: fights you'd like to see in 2009 (but probably won't)
Posted: 04 Nov 2008, 10:14
by oliverfennell
Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:oliverfennell wrote:Superheavyweight wrote:
Joe Calzaghe vs. Bernard Hopkins II
Have you got jetlag?
chief support; Skelton v Sprott 3.
Get Nelson out of retirement to rematch Akinwande too, and I'm there!
Re: fights you'd like to see in 2009 (but probably won't)
Posted: 04 Nov 2008, 10:43
by m1kee50
Asikainen vs Duddy
Jamie Moore vs Winky Wright
Harrison vs Rogan
Froch - Kessler
Margarito vs Mayweather
Paul Williams vs Cotto
Re: fights you'd like to see in 2009 (but probably won't)
Posted: 04 Nov 2008, 10:58
by Chambers2
Hatton-Witter
Froch-JC
Margarito-DLH/PBF
Khan Vs Murray/Thaxton
Guzman Vs Pacman Vs JMM
Wayne Elcock Vs Darren McDermott Vs Matthew Macklin
Jamie Moore Vs That Ukranian Bayungsarov (or somat)
Re: fights you'd like to see in 2009 (but probably won't)
Posted: 04 Nov 2008, 10:59
by m1kee50
Hatton vs JMM anyone?
Re: fights you'd like to see in 2009 (but probably won't)
Posted: 04 Nov 2008, 14:51
by Captain Hook
Moore for a world title - Phillips, Forrest or whoever.
Froch v Kessler
Khan v Murray
Haye v Wlad
Re: fights you'd like to see in 2009 (but probably won't)
Posted: 04 Nov 2008, 15:58
by WildWaylon
Autobarn wrote:Bernard Hopkins v Andre Berto at 170
Oscar de la Hoya v Ivan Calderon at 145-pound catchweight
Shane Mosley v Vic Darchinyan 141-pound catchweight
David Haye v Kelly Pavlik at 205
This is boxing isn't it, pick on smaller guy if it generates the money the money the money. When will viewers catch on re size mismatches, bloated elite fighters and catchweights for no championship.
And add Joe Calzaghe v Ricky Hatton why not for the money the money the money.
In that case, why not Olympic champions Khan v Harrison LOL. Be a laugh that would.
Re: fights you'd like to see in 2009 (but probably won't)
Posted: 04 Nov 2008, 17:24
by Captain Hook
Superheavyweight wrote:oliverfennell wrote:Superheavyweight wrote:
Joe Calzaghe vs. Bernard Hopkins II
Have you got jetlag?
If Calzaghe wants the P4P-ATG-#1 Tag he needs to beat Jones/Hopkins-(convincingly)/Froch/Dawson then our boy Andre Ward.
The moneys there, and he can do it all without ever fighting in the next decade.
So you want Calzaghe to fight four more times? no chance pal, though it would be nice to see those fights happen. It'll be Jones and goodbye, unless he loses or it's close with Jones and they might rematch in Cardiff.
Re: fights you'd like to see in 2009 (but probably won't)
Posted: 04 Nov 2008, 17:41
by Captain Hook
Superheavyweight wrote:I want him to fight as many fights he can in 2009.
Although I agree that Jones/Hopkins/Froch all has more than a good chance stylistically...
Never happen sadly, he says this is his last fight but I've a sneaky feeling he'll have one more in Cardiff at the Millennium Stadium against Jones if it's close this weekend. He won't go near Hopkins after the Pavlik performance and Pavlik's stock has dropped. Froch doesn't bring the cash and he's beaten Kessler. The victory over Hopkins means he can sleep better without rematching him.
We'll see I guess.
Re: fights you'd like to see in 2009 (but probably won't)
Posted: 04 Nov 2008, 18:09
by Wales
KESSLER PAVLIK
Has anyone requested Kessler Pavlik? Both big straight punchers, could be good... providing pavlik can get couple of good wins on the back of that good hiding he got at the hands of Nrad.
Re: fights you'd like to see in 2009 (but probably won't)
Posted: 04 Nov 2008, 18:40
by jameswilson
WildWaylon wrote:Superheavyweight wrote:Wladimir Klitschko vs. Audley Harrison
Joe Calzaghe vs. Bernard Hopkins II
Floyd Mayweather vs. Paul Williams
I read the first two and thought this guy needs serious help, the third is an OK fight I suppose.
Read his other 50 or so posts. You'll soon see he really does need help.
Re: fights you'd like to see in 2009 (but probably won't)
Posted: 04 Nov 2008, 19:05
by jameswilson
Superheavyweight wrote:jameswilson wrote:
Read his other 50 or so posts. You'll soon see he really does need help.
Just out of interest, who do you have winning?
Id say with your level of maturity there are no winners.