BoxRec

I thought witter looked pretty good, the opponent wasn't that grate but witter was clinical powerful and came out attacking and I hope he gets in against a top level opponent soon. Grate KO as well.

What does everyone think?

I thought it was grate the way he grated his opponent down.

To celebrate Im gonna grate some cheese over my soup and then have some frosties.

They're grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrreat!

jameswilson wrote:I thought it was grate the way he grated his opponent down.

To celebrate Im gonna grate some cheese over my soup and then have some frosties.

They're grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrreat!

Dont take rhe widdle, I think Josh is Gr8.

jameswilson wrote:I thought it was grate the way he grated his opponent down.

To celebrate Im gonna grate some cheese over my soup and then have some frosties.

They're grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrreat!

Cheers James I'd never noticed my spelling was shit

Sorry Josh it was just you spelt it wrong twice in the same post!


I pretty much agree, the opponent was very timid and not in Junior's league. It was good to hear after the fight from Hennessy that there are options and an immediate shot at Bradley is a possibility. Lets hope Junior is back in the ring pretty soon tho, we don't need another 6 month break.

Witter looked good. Did what he needed to do.

Asterix wrote:Witter looked good. Did what he needed to do.

Supprised he didn't seem to be switching around furthermore he was a lot more come forward.

As I have stated before I think Witter boxes a lot more effectively as an orthodox fighter and even though the switching is to confuse his opponents, as a southpaw he lunges and looks uncomfortable. He got the job done against an Argentine unknown and even though the Argies are usually tough nuts, this one couldn't take the well placed body shots.

European crack or an eliminator next? Contrary to what was said post fight I cannot see him beating Bradley if they were to rematch but an eliminator against Devon Alexander could be interesting business for both parties.

steve689 wrote:As I have stated before I think Witter boxes a lot more effectively as an orthodox fighter and even though the switching is to confuse his opponents, as a southpaw he lunges and looks uncomfortable. He got the job done against an Argentine unknown and even though the Argies are usually tough nuts, this one couldn't take the well placed body shots.

European crack or an eliminator next? Contrary to what was said post fight I cannot see him beating Bradley if they were to rematch but an eliminator against Devon Alexander could be interesting business for both parties.

I think he could fight Brady, he lost closely to Bradey and seemed to be fighting a lot better, I don't like the conservative approach to getting titles back, he will not get any better he has settled his nerves he should get the fight as soon as he can.

josh fg wrote:I thought witter looked pretty good, the opponent wasn't that grate but witter was clinical powerful and came out attacking and I hope he gets in against a top level opponent soon. Grate KO as well.

What does everyone think?

I think anybody who can't spell "great" hasn't got a chance at a job with The Guardian.

I was impressed with Witter's performance. As steve689 noticed, Witter boxed in a very orthodox stance. I think this helped increase the damage of his punches. The other guy had no answer whatsoever.

Good to see him looking focussed, he'll need to be at his best all the way now to land another world title shot.

oliverfennell wrote:

josh fg wrote:I thought witter looked pretty good, the opponent wasn't that grate but witter was clinical powerful and came out attacking and I hope he gets in against a top level opponent soon. Grate KO as well.

What does everyone think?

I think anybody who can't spell "great" hasn't got a chance at a job with The Guardian.

I don't quite follow this one but there you go, maybe i'm out the loop :P

Whether grate or great, the KO was impressive stuff but Witter must act fast if he is to get back into world class.

oliverfennell wrote:

josh fg wrote:I thought witter looked pretty good, the opponent wasn't that grate but witter was clinical powerful and came out attacking and I hope he gets in against a top level opponent soon. Grate KO as well.

What does everyone think?

I think anybody who can't spell "great" hasn't got a chance at a job with The Guardian.

A little harsh good job it doesn't preclude one from working for Oxfam really!

oliverfennell wrote:

josh fg wrote:I thought witter looked pretty good, the opponent wasn't that grate but witter was clinical powerful and came out attacking and I hope he gets in against a top level opponent soon. Grate KO as well.

What does everyone think?

I think anybody who can't spell "great" hasn't got a chance at a job with The Guardian.

Private Eye refers to it as The Grauniad, so I think he might fit in well

I think Witter may have the longevity of Bernard Hopkins.He condition and focus was impressive and he really does seem to still have all his faculties.

I'm an Independent reader myself. That, Private Eye, and The Economist

Terry D wrote:[quote

I think anybody who can't spell "great" hasn't got a chance at a job with The Guardian.

Private Eye refers to it as The Grauniad, so I think he might fit in well[/quote]

I call it arse wiping paper.[/quote] Better than being a Scum reader, I use The Times, my arse deserves it.

my first job in the morning at the moment is to read the guardian, the times, the sun the mirror the financial times and the daily hate mail. I can confirm that the FT is the best paper followed by the guardian for news IMHO!

Im a Daily Sport man.

josh fg wrote:my first job in the morning at the moment is to read the guardian, the times, the sun the mirror the financial times and the daily hate mail. I can confirm that the FT is the best paper followed by the guardian for news IMHO!

Bloody hell! And what's your second job in the morning?? War and Peace followed by the Bible?

Witter needs to fight again soon v Branco will be good start.

oliverfennell wrote:

josh fg wrote:my first job in the morning at the moment is to read the guardian, the times, the sun the mirror the financial times and the daily hate mail. I can confirm that the FT is the best paper followed by the guardian for news IMHO!

Bloody hell! And what's your second job in the morning?? War and Peace followed by the Bible?

No. Mein Kampf.

I wanna know why Castro had the tramp from Happy Gilmore in his corner.

jameswilson wrote:

oliverfennell wrote:

josh fg wrote:my first job in the morning at the moment is to read the guardian, the times, the sun the mirror the financial times and the daily hate mail. I can confirm that the FT is the best paper followed by the guardian for news IMHO!

Bloody hell! And what's your second job in the morning?? War and Peace followed by the Bible?

No. Mein Kampf.

Pay attention James, he already said the Daily Mail.

josh fg wrote:my first job in the morning at the moment is to read the guardian, the times, the sun the mirror the financial times and the daily hate mail. I can confirm that the FT is the best paper followed by the guardian for news IMHO!

What job is that mate?

Payney is right, the Mail is aimed at middle-aged, middle class white supremacists and women :)