Page 1 of 1
Larry Holmes Vs George Foreman
Posted: 25 May 2003, 05:31
by Tyson KTFO 3 Times
I think this would be an interesting Fight, Holmes has become one of the most underrated fighter along with Sonny liston IMO. I think that foreman is slightly overrated and at his best lacked stamina.
I Also have doubts about foreman's ablity to go the 15, against an opponent as seasoned as Holmes was
So i am going to say something properly very controversal...
Holmes KO 14
Posted: 25 May 2003, 16:58
by Dave1armedTua
If Jimmy Young could do it, so could Larry Holmes.
Holmes KO 12
Posted: 25 May 2003, 19:04
by southpaw_21
True, Holmes chin was much better and he had more overall skills than Young. This will be a copycat of the second Shavers-Holmes fight. Holmes TKO 12.
Posted: 01 Jun 2003, 17:07
by DLH=Chicken
I'm going to have to go with Holmes here.
Holmes took out Shavers who was a slugger like Foreman with a little more power and a little slower.
Holmes ring generalship/ illusive movement is underrated and I believe he would slow Foreman down with his great jab by moving after he threw it then start putting a right hand behind it.
Holmes W15.
Posted: 07 Jun 2003, 16:36
by jsc1973
In the 1970s, Holmes W15.
In the 1990s, Foreman W12.
The young Foreman was too easy to outbox and wasn't very smart in the ring; he was exposed on the first count by Young and on the second one by Ali. The old Foreman was a smarter fighter, and I feel like he retained a little bit more of his skills (though the old Holmes wasn't half-bad until right at the end).
It's too bad they never could make the fight happen, in either era. We had that long thread on why Duran and Pryor never fought, but to me, Foreman-Holmes is more unusual in that it never happened.
Posted: 15 Jun 2003, 21:52
by Barney Ross' Neighbor
If they had met in '78 or '79, Holmes by UD, after surviving scary moments. Foreman would plod and eat that jackhammer jab but he might land a bomb as Shavers or Snipes did. Still, Holmes had the smarts and the grit to get out of trouble.
Posted: 16 Jun 2003, 07:58
by cybox
my friend Doc fought them both and he said that Holmes would outbox George, but if George landed that one big punch..lookout Larry...bye bye
Posted: 16 Jun 2003, 16:10
by Dave1armedTua
cybox wrote:my friend Doc fought them both and he said that Holmes would outbox George, but if George landed that one big punch..lookout Larry...bye bye
You can say that about anyone George fought. If he only landed that 1 punch.
Posted: 17 Jun 2003, 09:36
by Tyson KTFO 3 Times
cybox wrote:my friend Doc fought them both and he said that Holmes would outbox George, but if George landed that one big punch..lookout Larry...bye bye
No-one could knock out larry with 1 punch, Shavers found this out in their second fight. IMO Holmes has one, if not the greatest chin of all time.
Posted: 17 Jun 2003, 12:40
by italian raging bull
I agree with the general thinking: Larry Holmes in the late 70s-early 80s would have been the winner; he had an amazing control of the fight, and his arms were a "moving wall"; then, it's obvious, with Foreman we can never exlude a win by ko.
About Holmes' chin and heart: absolutely great, I guess, considering we're talking about heavyweight division, where a godd punch can drop virtually anybody: let's look the two losses from Lennox Lewis and compare them with Holmes' Shavers & Snipes fights.
Posted: 17 Jun 2003, 16:05
by Tyson KTFO 3 Times
italian raging bull wrote:I agree with the general thinking: Larry Holmes in the late 70s-early 80s would have been the winner; he had an amazing control of the fight, and his arms were a "moving wall"; then, it's obvious, with Foreman we can never exlude a win by ko.
About Holmes' chin and heart: absolutely great, I guess, considering we're talking about heavyweight division, where a godd punch can drop virtually anybody: let's look the two losses from Lennox Lewis and compare them with Holmes' Shavers & Snipes fights.
Good Points, as i have said when i created the thread, i think holmes would win. Great fighter.
Posted: 18 Jun 2003, 06:07
by Dave1armedTua
Oh well, this gives me an excuse to generate more posts
Posted: 18 Jun 2003, 06:27
by Dave1armedTua
You seem to like copy and paste commands, so, here goes!
Posted: 18 Jun 2003, 06:36
by Tyson KTFO 3 Times
Thats two of my damn thread turned to rubbish by petty arguements..please leave my threads alone,.
Holmes/Foreman
Posted: 21 Jun 2003, 10:46
by Kayo25
The proverbial ? "If they were both in their prime", Holmes would have worn Big George out by excellent footwork and a jab akin to a Louisville Slugger. He would have had George completely out of gas by round 6, and would have stopped him around the 7th or 8th, IMHO. If this fight takes place after the rebirth of their respective careers, then I like Big George by a late round stoppage. But that's what's fun about about fighters that never met at the top of their game. Pure speculation on our part, but fun nevertheless. :)