Page 1 of 1
Which one do you prefer?
Posted: 04 Dec 2008, 10:54
by forcefraser
Which of these lines up would you prefer to see and who wins?
Cotto V Mayweather
Calzaghe v Tavoris Cloud
Paul Williams v James Kirkland
Haye v Chris Arreola
or
Kessler v Froch
Pavlik v Abraham
Berto v Margarito
Breidis Prescott v Anthony Peterson
Only in dreams eh?
Re: Which one do you prefer?
Posted: 04 Dec 2008, 11:02
by REAL_DEAL
2nd one.
Re: Which one do you prefer?
Posted: 04 Dec 2008, 11:05
by Coco
The second one by a mile, they are more competitive fights
Re: Which one do you prefer?
Posted: 04 Dec 2008, 11:09
by Poncey
...and 3 unifications. I'd pay £25 for it.
Re: Which one do you prefer?
Posted: 04 Dec 2008, 11:34
by tonyevs
Unlikely to ever happen though is it ..
who actually is managing/promoting prescott now?
Re: Which one do you prefer?
Posted: 04 Dec 2008, 11:39
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
The first simply because of Mayweather-Cotto, Mayweather fights have been my fave for the past few years, miss him not fighting this year (or maybe never again - at least at his best)
Re: Which one do you prefer?
Posted: 04 Dec 2008, 14:52
by Tommy Gunn13
REAL_DEAL wrote:2nd one.
Snap...
Re: Which one do you prefer?
Posted: 05 Dec 2008, 03:17
by Tykemania
I went for the second one. Unfortunately, by fight night my £50 was in the promoters bank account and "late drop outs" had changed the bill to:
Kessler v A Great Dane
Pavlik v The Guy Who Played Papa Smurf
Berto v The Waiter from the Promoters Local Tapas Bar
Breidis Prescott v My Gran
Re: Which one do you prefer?
Posted: 05 Dec 2008, 04:39
by Gray-Fox
The first one.
Anything with Mayweather is sure to be of interest to me.