Page 1 of 1
Bernard Hopkins V's Kendall Holt
Posted: 13 Dec 2008, 22:18
by Hagler2002
Why is Hopkins 2/1?
I can't believe the price on Bernard, I'm putting the xmas money on this!!!!!
Re: Bernard Hopkins V's Kendall Holt
Posted: 13 Dec 2008, 22:22
by d
Hagler2002 wrote:Why is Hopkins 2/1?
I can't believe the price on Bernard, I'm putting the xmas money on this!!!!!
It's not Bernard mate.
It's Demetris, his nephew.
Re: Bernard Hopkins V's Kendall Holt
Posted: 13 Dec 2008, 22:41
by My T Sharp
Can he ko him ???? wrote:sorry you are mistaken on the back of my boxing news it says Torres v Hopkins !!
Ask for a refund...it's Holt
Re: Bernard Hopkins V's Kendall Holt
Posted: 13 Dec 2008, 23:14
by REAL_DEAL
Hagler2002 wrote:Why is Hopkins 2/1?
I can't believe the price on Bernard, I'm putting the xmas money on this!!!!!
Yeah if bernard hopkins fought holt at that price i would empty my bank account on that.
Re: Bernard Hopkins V's Kendall Holt
Posted: 14 Dec 2008, 07:35
by Hagler2002
I seem to have lost all my Christmas money on a schoolboy error, it wasn't Bernard fighting :x
Re: Bernard Hopkins V's Kendall Holt
Posted: 14 Dec 2008, 07:51
by Loftgroov
Hagler2002 wrote:I seem to have lost all my Christmas money on a schoolboy error, it wasn't Bernard fighting :x
Is there a reason why you thought Bernard had boiled down to light-welterweight for his next encounter?
What next .... Wlad Klitschko calls out Vic Darchinyan - "I'm coming for you chump!"
Re: Bernard Hopkins V's Kendall Holt
Posted: 14 Dec 2008, 08:15
by jameswilson
Loftgroov wrote:Hagler2002 wrote:I seem to have lost all my Christmas money on a schoolboy error, it wasn't Bernard fighting :x
Is there a reason why you thought Bernard had boiled down to light-welterweight for his next encounter?
What next .... Wlad Klitschko calls out Vic Darchinyan - "I'm coming for you chump!"
Nah you read that wrong, it's his relative Vitali who is fighting him next. It's an easy mistake to make tho they both have the same sirname.
Re: Bernard Hopkins V's Kendall Holt
Posted: 14 Dec 2008, 09:37
by Autobarn
Did they show the Matt Korobov fight?
Re: Bernard Hopkins V's Kendall Holt
Posted: 14 Dec 2008, 11:00
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
To be fair you would have lost anyway as at 140 Holt beats 'Nard, curtesy of Nard being dead at the weight (literally)
Re: Bernard Hopkins V's Kendall Holt
Posted: 14 Dec 2008, 22:47
by chesh
Autobarn wrote:Did they show the Matt Korobov fight?
No.