Page 1 of 2
james de gale
Posted: 15 Dec 2008, 09:46
by tommo100
do you think he`ll make it in the pro ranks or/and will warren take him down the khan route of
fighting has beens,never will be`s and fighters that can`t hit back?
Re: james de gale
Posted: 15 Dec 2008, 09:51
by doctorboxing
For the first while, thats exactly the route he will take however I dont think it will last long. The public have began to see through Khan and with promoters like Hayemaker putting their fighters in competitive fights, I think people will tire very quickly of De Gale et al beating up on punchbags to headline shows.
Frank has to realise that with the competition from Hennesy on ITV and some great boxing on Setanta, he cant put on mismatches with poor undercards and expect people to pay anymore.
Re: james de gale
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 08:18
by MR UNTOUCHABLE
I don't think DeGale will do it!
He seems really cocky, but I don't think he has the substance behind the words.
Re: james de gale
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 10:45
by hitman_hatton1
i think he's a good talent.
good skills.
looks a tough sort.
can tough it out as we saw in the olympic final.
respectable puncher.
harder to tell on the power in the amateurs cos of the shorter distances.
i fancy his power to come out in the pro's.
definitely one to watch.

Re: james de gale
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 10:56
by Old bones Ian
DeGale needs alot of work on his punching to turn it from amateur to pro.
And as with every boxer at some point it comes down to how well he takes a punch, i've not seen anything from the amatuers to say he can't take a good punch, but the pros are a different game.
Re: james de gale
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 11:54
by mark thompson
I fancy Sutherland to go further than De Gale in there respective careers .
Re: james de gale
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 11:58
by whicker
How much of a draw will he be? His gold was a great achievement, but he hasn't come back as "superstar" or developed as a "household name" since. Sure, he won gold- and won it well, but there hasn't really been much publicity about him since in the mainstream press or TV- unlike (for example) Rebecca Adlington who seems never to be out of the glossy magazines, press supliments , TV awards etc since she came back from China.
Other than boxing fans, I'd be surprised if 1 in 20 people could even name him or identify who he was from a picture.
Re: james de gale
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 11:59
by Old bones Ian
At the moment Sutherland has a much more pro style than DeGale, I'd say he will settle in the pros quicker, but DeGale may last the longer.
Will set up a decent rivalry if both stay unbeaten for a couple of years.
Re: james de gale
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 12:02
by mark thompson
Old bones Ian wrote:At the moment Sutherland has a much more pro style than DeGale, I'd say he will settle in the pros quicker, but DeGale may last the longer.
Will set up a decent rivalry if both stay unbeaten for a couple of years.
Especially if both go unbeaten for say 15 fights then a good domestic fight should be on the cards .
Re: james de gale
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 12:14
by whicker
I can see Sutherlands career going along a very different path to DeGales. It all depends on how they progress, of course, but I can see Sutherland being involved in decent, challenging match ups, building up a solid, impressive (but not necessarily unbeaten) record and possibly success at European level.
DeGale on the other hand I think will follow a rather different route, with fewer competative match ups and more "intercontinetal" or for that matter commonwealth style "titles."
Re: james de gale
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 15:06
by Gray-Fox
Exactly.
They'll never meet unless it's worth millions.
Re: james de gale
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 15:15
by Gray-Fox
Incidentally, I've just heard that James Degale's coach is going to be Jim McDonnell. I had to laugh.
Re: james de gale
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 15:23
by gobbles
Gray-Fox wrote:Incidentally, I've just heard that James Degale's coach is going to be Jim McDonnell. I had to laugh.
I heard he was going to be trained by Jimmy Tibbs
Re: james de gale
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 15:28
by Captain Hook
gobbles wrote:Gray-Fox wrote:Incidentally, I've just heard that James Degale's coach is going to be Jim McDonnell. I had to laugh.
I heard he was going to be trained by Jimmy Tibbs
The latest is that it's going to be a London trainer and it's down to two men, so one of you may be right.
Just had copy through from PA saying that.....
Re: james de gale
Posted: 17 Dec 2008, 09:15
by ogsie
I think Degale should be trained at Brenden Ingle's, his style would suit the way Ingle's fighters box. However with him wanting to be trained on London, i cant really see a what trainer he will go with
Re: james de gale
Posted: 17 Dec 2008, 11:09
by Old bones Ian
I'd have him go with Niky Cooks dad, can't remember his name at the moment. He's London based isn't he?
Or James Cook
Re: james de gale
Posted: 17 Dec 2008, 12:41
by Arnie
Ingles gym would be good for him imo
Re: james de gale
Posted: 17 Dec 2008, 13:31
by gobbles
MR UNTOUCHABLE wrote:I don't think DeGale will do it!
He seems really cocky, but I don't think he has the substance behind the words.
If anything sums up this board, this is it. How about you give the guy a chance?
Re: james de gale
Posted: 17 Dec 2008, 14:01
by Wax On
I'm with you Gobbles.
What at idiotic comment.
James Degale has done himself and his country proud winning a Gold Medal and I think as boxing fans we should give him a bit of support.
Yes, Ams is different than the pros, Yes he mastered the art of winning in the Ams, but this doesn't mean he won't be able to make it in the pro ranks. There are many factors which will determine that, and time will tell, but....
"I don't THINK he'll will do it......because........I THINK he seems really cocky and with no substance." Means what??
Poor James, I bet he's crying himself to sleep because if Mr Untouchable THINKS he has no substance and that he'll never make it.
Give the lad a chance for crying out loud! Too many haters on these boards sometimes!!
Re: james de gale
Posted: 06 Jan 2009, 06:45
by leeharding
hope he does well but dont think he will last in pro game but hope im proven wrong
Re: james de gale
Posted: 06 Jan 2009, 07:20
by TerribleTerry
Arnie wrote:Ingles gym would be good for him imo
Talking of talented amateurs, how is Frankie looking Arnie?
I take it he is in Manchester now?
Re: james de gale
Posted: 06 Jan 2009, 07:27
by pasty_spud
mark thompson wrote:I fancy Sutherland to go further than De Gale in there respective careers .
me too
Re: james de gale
Posted: 06 Jan 2009, 08:34
by chinny
Good piece as usual by Donald Mcrae in todays Guardian. I've gone right off Degale, far too much big I am attitude
http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2009/ja ... iew-boxing
Re: james de gale
Posted: 06 Jan 2009, 09:05
by Goz
It's tough to call how amateurs will fare in the pro ranks. Often glaring faults can be masked over in the amateur game (See Audley Harrison).
It's exciting to have these guys to look forward to though, British boxing is still very interesting....
Re: james de gale
Posted: 06 Jan 2009, 12:21
by Chambers2
I don't buy into this ethos that "He is cocky, therefore I don't like him". Boxers get paid more if they are well known and being cocky (rather than a shrinking violet) gets people talking about you.
I hope James does very well in the pro ranks, but we all know that the Gold Medal means very little in terms of results as a pro. The 2 codes are very different and are getting further apart imo, a fighters power, chin and stamina (amongst other attributes) are far more important as a pro than they are as Amateur. Time Will Tell whether James has the necessary attributes and dedication to make it to the top in the pro ranks.
Come on James Degale!!