Page 1 of 4
Scathing Calzaghe attack
Posted: 15 Dec 2008, 15:33
by ALI
By Mike Cassell, Philadelphia Boxing Report (Dec 15, 2008) Doghouse Boxing
The L.A. times led with a story, “Pro boxing dying a natural death”. Yes, it is true. But it wasn’t written this week, or this year, it was on OCTOBER 5TH 1916.
Whether its Floyd Mayweather Jr’s accusations of racism by HBO broadcasters, or Joe Calzaghe’s recent trashing of the sport that made him, these retired annoying “STARS” just won’t seem to go away. Joe Calzaghe is like that drunk uncle who stays too long, talks too much, and just when you think he
is going to leave, he is back to annoy you.
After earning a small fortune in the sport of boxing in Europe and right here in the United States, he can’t seem to keep his big mouth shut when it comes to what is wrong with the sport. Maybe if his royal highness could have spoke up sooner, we could have saved the game from its obvious and inevitable demise. It is so like this egomaniacal buffoon to think that the sport will not survive without him. Joe, just for the record, the sport was around long before you got here, and it will be around long after you’re gone. That I guarantee. And maybe it will have members who are a bit more grateful and giving to the sport that made them millionaires.
"I think boxing is a dying sport. Globally -- in America for instance -- you've got UFC, which has taken a lot off boxing, business-wise," Joe Calzaghe
There is enough room for MMA, just like there was enough room for the booming eighties sport of kickboxing, which by the way was supposed to kill boxing too. It was a sport featured in movies, and managed to weave itself into 80’s POP culture very easily. Then it just stopped being entertaining. As much as it tried, the talent level just wasn’t there. People once again came back to where the talent is, boxing, and continued to pay your salary. Maybe if you used your name and some of the money you made from this “dying sport”, to invigorate or help bring change to the game you supposedly love, things would get better. But no, you choose to take your money and run, and then shoot your employer. That’s some loyalty Joe. I’m sure glad they didn’t make them like you over there in the 1940’s; we would all be speaking German right now.
"There is too much politics in boxing, too many belts and too many champions, which dilutes real champions like myself," he said. "There are four world champions in each division and it's bad because there are no stars any more. It's a big problem." Joe Calzaghe
Does this guy even hear himself talking? Trust me Joe; you were diluted long before boxing ever got to you my friend. If anything, boxing gave your life context. Maybe you think staying in a dead division for 10 years, and coming out to fight a bunch of old guys, somehow makes you this big “star” you think you are. It really doesn’t. The reason there are so many belts is because MEGA STARS like yourself wouldn’t fight anybody with any real talent during the best part of your career. The super middleweight division had no one of any real talent for years, and when it did, you seemed to not pay attention. How can a star be made when you don’t give anyone with a fighting chance a shot. I’m sure Tocker Pudwill, Mger Mkrtchian, and Will McIntyre would have understood if a superstar like yourself would have fought guys like Robert Allen, Glen Johnson, and James Toney in their prime. Fighters that Roy Jones and Bernard Hopkins had no fear in facing, while facing each other.
"America only had one medalist in the Olympics this year," Calzaghe said. "In Britain, we did pretty good, but I'm glad I'm ending my career and not starting it because I don't think it's going to be that great in the future." Joe Calzaghe
Books have been written about the dysfunctional nature of Olympic boxing. The problem isn’t the sport itself; it is the idiots we have entrusted international boxing to. Olympic boxing is very bad now, and it was very bad twenty years ago when Roy Jones was robbed of a gold medal. It didn’t stop Roy from becoming a star, and it shouldn’t stop anyone with any real talent. The real problem with boxing is the take the money and run attitude of self delusional boxing stars and promoters. They think it is all about them, as you think it is all about you. I have a great idea. Why don’t you call Floyd Mayweather Jr., pool your money together and buy an island somewhere without a phone, and stay retired.
That would probably be the best thing you could ever do for the sport.
They have also published an article where old B-Hop takes his turn at ripping Calzaghe a new one:
Hopkins on Calzaghe - doghouseboxing.com
Bernard Hopkins is not the least bit happy with recent statements from Joe Calzaghe in which Calzaghe says the sport of Boxing is dying. Quoted by the Ring Magazine, Hopkins blasted Calzaghe over his recent comments.
Hopkins states to the publication: "I don’t know where he’s been, on Mars or something. Maybe he missed the numbers that (Oscar De La Hoya-Manny Pacquaio) generated – 1.25 million pay-per-view buys in a recession. That’s 70, 80 million dollars in revenue. And he’s says boxing is dead?"
Hopkins went on to diss Calzaghe and add that Calzaghe should go ahead and retire and keep his mouth shut. "Maybe it’s dead when he fights. If he wants to retire, he should go ahead and retire and keep his mouth shut. He has his wins, his undefeated record. He should go join his family. Other than that, he should shut up. And tell him Bernard says that," said Hopkins.
It seems Joe has his detractors over on DogHouse. I think his comments are fair, but like the writer points out, its a little ironic to be comming from his mouth, at this stage of his career. Calzaghe is right when he states there are to many belts = to many champions. Its terrible for the sport IMO. One belt per division, with one ranking body, controlled by a fair and just, properly regulated governing body that works for the good of the sport. The best fight the best, and the best cannot beat up on unproven clubfighters. Calzaghe would do well to remember that it was the various belts = various chamions set up that allowed him to dodge and hide for all those years he reigned as champion, so its a little ironic all that comming from him now.
You reap what you sow, and i for one will always remember Calzaghe for his unwillingness to fight the best during his long winded WBO reign. So perhaps he should watch his words, even if they do ring with some truth!
Re: Scathing Calzaghe attack
Posted: 15 Dec 2008, 15:47
by Chambers2
Shaun George: "Calzaghe, Why Not Fight Chad Dawson?"
http://www.BS.com/?m=show&id=17474
Interesting George quote:
All he is doing is fighting the older guys," says Shaun George, 17-2-2 (8 KO), a native of Brooklyn, NY. "He's not letting the younger fighters in the division come up. The way boxing creates new stars is by having the younger guys pick up where the older guys leave off. By fighting people in their 40's like Roy Jones and Bernard Hopkins, Calzaghe is feeding into the problem.
"Boxing is not dying, but what hurts the sport is when the top stars don't want to fight the rising contenders in their divisions. Why not fight a young guy like me or Chad Dawson? He won't because he just wants to cash in.
What's that saying? "It's better to let everyone think you're an idiot, rather than to open your mouth and remove all doubt"
It seems that Calzaghe is now a universally recognised Bell End!
Re: Scathing Calzaghe attack
Posted: 15 Dec 2008, 18:16
by gobbles
Chambers2 wrote:Shaun George: "Calzaghe, Why Not Fight Chad Dawson?"
http://www.BS.com/?m=show&id=17474
Interesting George quote:
All he is doing is fighting the older guys," says Shaun George, 17-2-2 (8 KO), a native of Brooklyn, NY. "He's not letting the younger fighters in the division come up. The way boxing creates new stars is by having the younger guys pick up where the older guys leave off. By fighting people in their 40's like Roy Jones and Bernard Hopkins, Calzaghe is feeding into the problem.
"Boxing is not dying, but what hurts the sport is when the top stars don't want to fight the rising contenders in their divisions. Why not fight a young guy like me or Chad Dawson? He won't because he just wants to cash in.
What's that saying? "It's better to let everyone think you're an idiot, rather than to open your mouth and remove all doubt"
It seems that Calzaghe is now a universally recognised Bell End!
Why do you hate Calzaghe so much Chambers? You sound like a very bitter person. Calzaghe is hardly the first person to suggest the sport might be dying, certainly in the US, which I believe is where the quote was aimed at.
And the funny thing is, people slag him off for fighting old guys and then suggest he is running away from a rematch with Hopkins or should face Winky Wright. Odd.
"All he is doing is fighting older guys". This year, maybe. But that has hardly been the case before. And talk about cheek from Hopkins, he was chasing Roy Jones Jr in November, last year he fought Winky Wright .
Re: Scathing Calzaghe attack
Posted: 15 Dec 2008, 19:31
by Max Molyneux
i for one will always remember Calzaghe for his unwillingness to fight the best during his long winded WBO reign
Other than a prime Roy Jones and Ottke who would of been the best and who would of been the superfights?
He Is the first undisputed 12 stone champion too, winning all 4 and two time ring belt champ.
Sure some should of happened and that Joe was probably guilty of not playing ball but some I feel over exaggerate It by overly blaming him too.
Re: Scathing Calzaghe attack
Posted: 15 Dec 2008, 20:49
by gobbles
Ant Evans wrote:Max Molyneux wrote:i for one will always remember Calzaghe for his unwillingness to fight the best during his long winded WBO reign
Other than a prime Roy Jones and Ottke who would of been the best and who would of been the superfights?
He Is the first undisputed 12 stone champion too, winning all 4 and two time ring belt champ.
Sure some should of happened and that Joe was probably guilty of not playing ball but some I feel over exaggerate It by overly blaming him too.
Antwun Echols - Joe turned down. Glen Johnson - 3 times he pulled out. Anthony Mundine - turned down going to Oz for career best pay-day. Clinton Woods signed - Joe pulled out as "too risky" as a final eliminator. Markus Beyer - never happened (fought Woodhall, who'd got clobbered by Beyer instead). Plus, Ottke, who was real champ. All off top of my head.
Calzaghe struggled with injuries. Are you suggesting that is made up?
Who says Joe turned down Echols? Was it Echols? How would he know. You just have to read boxingtalk to know half of the crazy stuff American fighters believe about Europe. They publish it unedited. Sauerland always refused a unification between Calzaghe and Ottke.
Why wouldn't Mundine come to Britain? How many British or American fighters have ever gone to Australia to defend their titles? Strange one to knock him with.
And your strange quote marks on "too risky" seem to imply you were in the room when Joe said that. The imagination can play tricks with you, especially if you trust yourself with rewriting history.
He didn't want to fight Woods - would that have helped his legacy? And Warren turned that down when it was clear it wasn't going to be for a title.
Re: Scathing Calzaghe attack
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 00:27
by oliverfennell
Most of the criticisms are valid, but the writer knocks Calzaghe for not fighting... Robert Allen??
Re: Scathing Calzaghe attack
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 05:35
by Chambers2
gobbles wrote:Chambers2 wrote:Shaun George: "Calzaghe, Why Not Fight Chad Dawson?"
http://www.BS.com/?m=show&id=17474
Interesting George quote:
All he is doing is fighting the older guys," says Shaun George, 17-2-2 (8 KO), a native of Brooklyn, NY. "He's not letting the younger fighters in the division come up. The way boxing creates new stars is by having the younger guys pick up where the older guys leave off. By fighting people in their 40's like Roy Jones and Bernard Hopkins, Calzaghe is feeding into the problem.
"Boxing is not dying, but what hurts the sport is when the top stars don't want to fight the rising contenders in their divisions. Why not fight a young guy like me or Chad Dawson? He won't because he just wants to cash in.
What's that saying? "It's better to let everyone think you're an idiot, rather than to open your mouth and remove all doubt"
It seems that Calzaghe is now a universally recognised Bell End!
Why do you hate Calzaghe so much Chambers? You sound like a very bitter person. Calzaghe is hardly the first person to suggest the sport might be dying, certainly in the US, which I believe is where the quote was aimed at.
And the funny thing is, people slag him off for fighting old guys and then suggest he is running away from a rematch with Hopkins or should face Winky Wright. Odd.
"All he is doing is fighting older guys". This year, maybe. But that has hardly been the case before. And talk about cheek from Hopkins, he was chasing Roy Jones Jr in November, last year he fought Winky Wright .
I don't hate Calzaghe, I just don't like his (mis)matchmaking ethics and the drivel that comes out of his mouth, like he'd "KO Froch in 3 rounds", but then refuses to back it up in the ring

Re: Scathing Calzaghe attack
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 15:30
by Captain Hook
Shame Bernard Hopkins didn't show as much fire when they fought each other!
Re: Scathing Calzaghe attack
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 15:50
by Captain Hook
Mate there is no way on God's earth Hopkins won that fight - he is lazy.
He beat Pavlik because Pavlik can't deal with a stylist.
Joe outworked him and won by two rounds on my card.
A lot of his work is sloppy but at least he does "a lot" of work and doesn't faff about, hold and complain.
I know you hate him but be fair

Re: Scathing Calzaghe attack
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 15:51
by gobbles
Terry D wrote:Captain Hook wrote:Shame Bernard Hopkins didn't show as much fire when they fought each other!
For some strange reason he may have thought an early touchdown and the cleaner boxing was winning him the fight. No real need for a kill-crazy rampage. Calzaghe's corner looked ashen at the end of it.
Cleaner punches - but barely any thrown after round 4. Calzaghe threw plenty of clean punches too. Hopkins's corner looked quite defeated too, hence Freddie Roach told him to retire.
Re: Scathing Calzaghe attack
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 16:16
by Captain Hook
Okay Terry, how about the Lacy fight? You had him to be knocked out. Or Kessler?
He won the Hopkins fight, no doubt. Hopkins does clean work, I agree, but it's that rare we have forgotten what it's like to see him fight three minutes of a round.
He gives you 20 seconds here and then, does a lot of mauling, is negative, pushes forward with his head down and then backs up and into his shell.
Not my idea of quality.
He's dull as ditchwater........props for the Pavlik win, but he lost to Calzaghe..
Re: Scathing Calzaghe attack
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 16:19
by gobbles
What point deduction? As far as I'm aware there wasn't one, although Hopkins shuld have had a point deducted for feigning injury. You must have been watching a different fight
I think I gave Calzaghe the third, I gave Hopkins the 10th or 11th. Not got my card in front of me. But I did have Calzaghe winning by 3 points, so I suppose that makes it 8-4 in rounds with a knockdown to Hopkins,
Re: Scathing Calzaghe attack
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 16:37
by Captain Hook
I wasn't sure about your Kessler prediction, hence the question mark.
But Kessler was a far more dangerous opponent in my opinion.
He won them both handily.
To describe Hopkins as clean and correct considering the way he fights is wide of the mark IMO. We'll agree to disagree, but I had him losing by two...
I'm no Calzaghe lover, but credit where it's due for those three performances.
He still gets criticised for taking on an "over-the-hill" Hopkins yet he has proven by beating Pavlik, and your score card, that he is still a stern test for anyone.
Re: Scathing Calzaghe attack
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 16:46
by stujones
There is no way Joe was injured for the 3 Johnson pull outs - one was cause of personal problems.
Hopkins, Jones, Toney, Simon, Ottke, Beyer, Larsen, Echols, Grant, Catley - all would have been great fights.
Re: Scathing Calzaghe attack
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 16:49
by stujones
As for Dawson - lets see how many tickets he can sell after handling a well known fighter (Tarver) impressively. He might be able to sell more tickets. Despite Bunce having a go, Max Kellerman isn't dumb - he wouldn't have announced Dawson as a potential future Joe opponent, if nobody knows him still.
Ever hear Sven Ottke get mentioned to Hopkins/Jones by Wally Matthews or Larry Merchant.
Re: Scathing Calzaghe attack
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 16:49
by observer1
Well said.
Oh and i hate B-Hop winning too.
Re: Scathing Calzaghe attack
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 16:51
by Captain Hook
stujones wrote:As for Dawson - lets see how many tickets he can sell after handling a well known fighter (Tarver) impressively. He might be able to sell more tickets. Despite Bunce having a go, Max Kellerman isn't dumb - he wouldn't have announced Dawson as a potential future Joe opponent, if nobody knows him still.
Ever hear Sven Ottke get mentioned to Hopkins/Jones by Wally Matthews or Larry Merchant.
He isn't dumb but he does know boxing and is employed by HBO so if he didn't know that he'd be thick as fook!
Re: Scathing Calzaghe attack
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 16:58
by stujones
Of course, but he could have mentioned Kessler, Hopkins, or other "named" fighters.... if Dawson is still a no name as Bunce implied. I just think Bunce likes having a go at the US commentators for the sake of it. He had a go at the recent Ivan Calderon fight, cause the interviewer suggested a "named" fighter who was too big for Calderon..... then Kellerman picks arguably the #1 Light Heavyweight, and he gets the Bunce treatment.
Re: Scathing Calzaghe attack
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 17:00
by Captain Hook
stujones wrote:Of course, but he could have mentioned Kessler, Hopkins, or other "named" fighters.... if Dawson is still a no name as Bunce implied. I just think Bunce likes having a go at the US commentators for the sake of it. He had a go at the recent Ivan Calderon fight, cause the interviewer suggested a "named" fighter who was too big for Calderon..... then Kellerman picks arguably the #1 Light Heavyweight, and he gets the Bunce treatment.
I'd not seen Bunce really attack him and then after the Wlad fight he was complaining about him pausing between words or something...was bit harsh I thought
Re: Scathing Calzaghe attack
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 17:04
by ALI
Max Molyneux wrote:Other than a prime Roy Jones and Ottke who would of been the best and who would of been the superfights?
He Is the first undisputed 12 stone champion too, winning all 4 and two time ring belt champ.
Sure some should of happened and that Joe was probably guilty of not playing ball but some I feel over exaggerate It by overly blaming him too.
Calzaghe always had oportunites at every stage of his WBO title reign to fight better oponents than he was actually fighting. Who cares to recall their names Max!
Max, why did Calzaghe except the Lacy fight? Because his reputation was in tatters thats why. Boxing fans everywhere had had it with him, he was all set to retire as the biggest waste of talent the world had ever seen with bucket loads of scorn being poured on him from all corners of the globe! Up stepped Gary Shaw with his new star to dog him into a Lacy fight, helped along with the peer pressure from millions of boxing fans around the world who were calling him for everything. Only then did he except to take on his first real live oponent (and even Warren is now saying that Calzaghe tried to pull out a week or two before the fight!)
Sure he deserves credit for the performance he put on that night, but he'd never have taken that fight had he had anywhere else to go but desolation row!
Re: Scathing Calzaghe attack
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 17:21
by gobbles
ALI wrote:
Calzaghe always had oportunites at every stage of his WBO title reign to fight better oponents than he was actually fighting. Who cares to recall their names Max!
Never let the facts get in the way of your point of view, eh?
Re: Scathing Calzaghe attack
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 17:42
by banjo
ALI wrote:and even Warren is now saying that Calzaghe tried to pull out a week or two before the fight
To be fair to Joe he actually admitted that in his book, so it's nothing new.
Re: Scathing Calzaghe attack
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 18:10
by ALI
gobbles wrote:ALI wrote:
Calzaghe always had oportunites at every stage of his WBO title reign to fight better oponents than he was actually fighting. Who cares to recall their names Max!
Never let the facts get in the way of your point of view, eh?
There's no need to delve into the past here Gobbles
'what exactly' 
Pope John Paul 2 was a catholic, Hitler a Nazi, and Calzaghe a wasted talent (who desperate'ly tried to turn it all around in the twilight of his career).
You want to challenge that stuff go right ahead

Re: Scathing Calzaghe attack
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 19:09
by gobbles
ALI wrote:gobbles wrote:ALI wrote:
Calzaghe always had oportunites at every stage of his WBO title reign to fight better oponents than he was actually fighting. Who cares to recall their names Max!
Never let the facts get in the way of your point of view, eh?
There's no need to delve into the past here Gobbles
'what exactly' 
Pope John Paul 2 was a catholic, Hitler a Nazi, and Calzaghe a wasted talent (who desperate'ly tried to turn it all around in the twilight of his career).
You want to challenge that stuff go right ahead

There are plenty of thing Calzaghe is, but I don't see him as a wasted talent.
1. He is a product of a period when boxing was buried on Sky, thus he lacked the wide profile to become a crossover star, which in turn led to a lack of opportunities on a bigger stage
2. I think his perceived lack of ambition comes from a) coming from off the beaten boxing track and not really having advisers of what to do other than his promoters; b) his early bad dealings with Mickey Duff and Terry Lawless; c) shyness; d) lazyness.
3. Many of his best years were spoiled by injuries and the breakdown of his marriage
4. Being in a poor division with a complete lack of opportunities and holding a belt which others felt happy to rubbish, even though the WBC belt was the poorest during his reign with a string of second-rate champions.
5. Being one of allegedly's few stars, which meant he had to fulfil a set number of TV dates.
Could he have done anything about those? Who knows, but that's all hindsight.
I don't think he has been desperate to turn his career around, he has probably come late to realise how powerful his position was.
It is worth remembering that Hatton's career only really took off after Amir Khan's performances at the 2004 Olympics, which gave the sport a real feelgood factor. Before that, everyone said it was dying
Re: Scathing Calzaghe attack
Posted: 16 Dec 2008, 19:38
by fist
Here we go again, same old bollocks, arm chair pundits throwing arrows from the safety of their homes, mentioning names of supposed big fights that Joe ducked - either average fighters, or fighters from different weight classes or fighters that pulled out of fighting Calzaghe.
As a SMW no one is better. He unified, he won every belt. I dont care too much for his move up in weight, but it showed he is no doubt one of the very best LHWs at the moment. His legacy is secured and he is one of the best if not THE best British boxers of all time. Ive enjoyed his fights and enjoyed his style. He's celebrated by many, including world class boxers past and present. Great achievement for a boxer to win Sports personality last year, and he's been recieving the recognition that his talent and achievements deserve.
IMO he can retire knowing he acheived the lot - world champion status, undisputed. One of the best SMWs there has been.