Pro boxer from 1913: Dick Large 0-1
Posted: 06 Jan 2009, 17:56
BoxRec
Pro boxer from 1913: Dick Large 0-1
Page 1 of 1
Re: Pro boxer from 1913: Dick Large 0-1
Posted: 08 Jan 2009, 13:53
Re: Pro boxer from 1913: Dick Large 0-1
Posted: 09 Jan 2009, 08:00
yea, not much of a puncher but the guy had balls.
Re: Pro boxer from 1913: Dick Large 0-1
Posted: 12 Jan 2009, 14:15
Re: Pro boxer from 1913: Dick Large 0-1
Posted: 13 Jan 2009, 00:26
A shame he never got any big fights. I'm sure he would have been able to rise to the occasion.
Re: Pro boxer from 1913: Dick Large 0-1
Posted: 13 Jan 2009, 00:43
Perhaps he could even have become a member or the Hall Of Fame?oliverfennell wrote:A shame he never got any big fights. I'm sure he would have been able to rise to the occasion.
Re: Pro boxer from 1913: Dick Large 0-1
Posted: 13 Jan 2009, 13:05
Nah, he was a stiff.Goodnight, Irene wrote:Perhaps he could even have become a member or the Hall Of Fame?oliverfennell wrote:A shame he never got any big fights. I'm sure he would have been able to rise to the occasion.
Re: Pro boxer from 1913: Dick Large 0-1
Posted: 13 Jan 2009, 16:48
Flump wrote:Nah, he was a stiff.Goodnight, Irene wrote:Perhaps he could even have become a member or the Hall Of Fame?oliverfennell wrote:A shame he never got any big fights. I'm sure he would have been able to rise to the occasion.
Re: Pro boxer from 1913: Dick Large 0-1
Posted: 13 Jan 2009, 18:08
He was better than a stiff. That's a blow below the belt.