Page 1 of 1
John Fewkes
Posted: 27 Jan 2009, 12:20
by TerribleTerry
What is happening with this little ginger box of tricks?
I had hoped that the upset loss to Gethin would have galvanised the Sheffield fighter into refinding his fitness and form. 4 months on and he still not boxed. With only two outings in 2008 he could be accused or resting on his laurels.
I love watching 'Fireball' Fewkes in action and I hope he isn't going to waste his career with infrequent fights and battles with the scales..
Any updates from the Sheffield based posters?
Re: John Fewkes
Posted: 27 Jan 2009, 13:13
by jim wright1
Yes, top lad is John. I heard he was training over in Ireland I think.
I hope he soon gets the momentum going again and gets back into contention.
Re: John Fewkes
Posted: 27 Jan 2009, 13:25
by dondada
Indeed, was in Ireland recently. Not sure if being in the land of Guinness is the cure for him 8)
If he could dedicate himself he'd get to British title contention...but what can you tell young uns these days?
Re: John Fewkes
Posted: 27 Jan 2009, 14:01
by Poncey
Which weight is he fighting at Boss?
Re: John Fewkes
Posted: 27 Jan 2009, 14:20
by dondada
Well, although I haven't spoken to him for about a month, Glyn told me the idea was for him to continue at lightweight.
John does find shifting weight terribly difficult but, strangely, he has done 9 9 quite comfortably in the past. I think it was for the Tontchev fight he pissed it.
Re: John Fewkes
Posted: 28 Jan 2009, 07:21
by Autobarn
I'd be very surprised if he were to come back as a lightweight after the Gethin episode. Totally drained going into that fight having come in heavy.
He was sick for the cancelled Murray fight and was weight anything to do with that one also?
Re: John Fewkes
Posted: 28 Jan 2009, 08:02
by dondada
Autobarn wrote:I'd be very surprised if he were to come back as a lightweight after the Gethin episode. Totally drained going into that fight having come in heavy.
He was sick for the cancelled Murray fight and was weight anything to do with that one also?
Auto - the point is, if he does it right, he won't be either heavy or weight drained. It's a bit of a 'lifestyle' issue, I feel.
Re: John Fewkes
Posted: 29 Jan 2009, 04:46
by dondada
John has been working in Ireland with his dad - the money was good.
Then he went on holiday to Mexico and had eight million tacos and seventy-four crates of cerveza.
He's back in the gym now. Was offered Prizefighter lightweights but Glyn knocked it back, rightly figuring that it's completely wrong for him, style wise.
So, if and when he shifts the weight (he will be competing at lightweight; too small to make a dent at 10st), he'll be back, possibly April time.
Re: John Fewkes
Posted: 29 Jan 2009, 09:23
by TerribleTerry
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:John has been working in Ireland with his dad - the money was good.
Then he went on holiday to Mexico and had eight million tacos and seventy-four crates of cerveza.
He's back in the gym now. Was offered Prizefighter lightweights but Glyn knocked it back, rightly figuring that it's completely wrong for him, style wise.
So, if and when he shifts the weight (he will be competing at lightweight; too small to make a dent at 10st), he'll be back, possibly April time.
Cheers for the update Ian - nice one
Look forward to seeing him in action once he is back in condition
Re: John Fewkes
Posted: 29 Jan 2009, 17:20
by Scrap
Funny enougth He is always in condition, its his weight thats not

Re: John Fewkes
Posted: 29 Jan 2009, 17:22
by Spud
Come on Fewkey - get your arse back in the ring and prove the doubters wrong!!
Re: John Fewkes
Posted: 29 Jan 2009, 21:07
by stujones
The guy has alot of talent, whats his dedication been like in the past... always wanted to see if he could make Super Feather.
Re: John Fewkes
Posted: 30 Jan 2009, 03:47
by lightheavy
stujones wrote:The guy has alot of talent, whats his dedication been like in the past... always wanted to see if he could make Super Feather.
Top lad
Re: John Fewkes
Posted: 30 Jan 2009, 10:51
by Dioufy
If he doesn't get his hunger back (not literlly) then he shouldn't be in a ring again - the performance against Gethin smacked of not being arsed.
Re: John Fewkes
Posted: 30 Jan 2009, 11:14
by dondada
Dioufy wrote:If he doesn't get his hunger back (not literlly) then he shouldn't be in a ring again - the performance against Gethin smacked of not being arsed.
He was knackered mate. F*cked up doing the weight a few days before the fight.
Re: John Fewkes
Posted: 30 Jan 2009, 11:41
by Dioufy
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Dioufy wrote:If he doesn't get his hunger back (not literlly) then he shouldn't be in a ring again - the performance against Gethin smacked of not being arsed.
He was knackered mate. F*cked up doing the weight a few days before the fight.
Yeah, that's my point. If he's not willing to put the work in the gym then he's going absolutely nowhere.
Re: John Fewkes
Posted: 30 Jan 2009, 18:50
by Scrap
In the gym He is Terriffic
Re: John Fewkes
Posted: 02 Feb 2009, 07:06
by danfoster
Forget about lightweight, that kid should be doing 9'4 no problem in my view
Re: John Fewkes
Posted: 02 Feb 2009, 07:37
by beagleboy
Re: John Fewkes
Posted: 02 Feb 2009, 07:39
by danfoster
It helps to develop the right hook quite nicely as well ...
Re: John Fewkes
Posted: 02 Feb 2009, 10:35
by Scrap
Im always taking the piss out of Him. He really is a great Kid, you cant help but take to Him. Trouble is He has loads of mates, and cant say NO.
Re: John Fewkes
Posted: 03 Feb 2009, 08:08
by danfoster
That's exactly what I've heard as well - really nice lad but lots of people want to buy him a pint
If he doesn't get past that then he won't go anywhere sadly
Def got potential to win Brit title, maybe even European if he could get down to Super Feather