Page 1 of 1
Sky Sports and their ignorance again
Posted: 05 Feb 2009, 14:53
by Finch
Calzaghe's retirement is breaking news on Setanta and interviews going on right left and centre to talk about him.
Not even mentioned on SSN.
I e-mailed Sky asking the questions about their lack of coverage towards world champions in JC and Carl Froch, and potential World Champions in David Haye, they didn't reply.

Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again
Posted: 05 Feb 2009, 16:20
by Hagler2002
Can't really blame them, why advertise someone they don't broadcast.
Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again
Posted: 05 Feb 2009, 17:06
by Finch
Hagler2002 wrote:Can't really blame them, why advertise someone they don't broadcast.
Should ITV not acknowledge Premiership football ?
Should Sky not acknowledge the World Cup ?
Should the BBC not acknowledge the Champions League in football focus ?
Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again
Posted: 05 Feb 2009, 17:18
by dondada
Hagler2002 wrote:Can't really blame them, why advertise someone they don't broadcast.
Then don't claim to be a sports news service.
Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again
Posted: 05 Feb 2009, 17:39
by leforge
Its on there website. He had many fights on there channels.
Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again
Posted: 05 Feb 2009, 19:16
by Wake up call
Sky never give credit to other networks or people associated with them.
Rupert Murdoch is the anti-christ.
Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again
Posted: 05 Feb 2009, 19:24
by steve689
Wake up call wrote:Sky never give credit to other networks or people associated with them.
Rupert Murdoch is the anti-christ.
Thought that was Richard Dawkins
![[icon_e_biggrin.gif] :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again
Posted: 05 Feb 2009, 19:59
by gobbles
Sky Sports News is a sad excuse for journalism. What's their email address?
Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again
Posted: 06 Feb 2009, 02:28
by oliverfennell
I remember SSN giving a lot of coverage to Tyson's retirement, when the fight that prompted it (McBride) had been on Setanta the previous night.
I don't see any reason why Sky should ignore Calzaghe's retirement announcement. I can see the point about "competition", but if he's not going to fight again, they're not promoting another channel, are they?
Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again
Posted: 06 Feb 2009, 03:07
by Finch
gobbles wrote:Sky Sports News is a sad excuse for journalism. What's their email address?
http://www.skysports.com/contactus/0,20299,,00.html
I filled this in however they just ignored it. pudenda.
Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again
Posted: 06 Feb 2009, 03:28
by Hagler2002
Finch wrote:Hagler2002 wrote:Can't really blame them, why advertise someone they don't broadcast.
Should ITV not acknowledge Premiership football ?
Should Sky not acknowledge the World Cup ?
Should the BBC not acknowledge the Champions League in football focus ?
I fail to see your point, do ITV have a weekly premiership round up? do the BBC have a 30 min slot discussing the Champions League? Why should Sky run a major story on someone they don't broadcast.
Sky sports ran the story on the ticker bar on the bottom of the screen, they also have an article on their website, seems quite suffice.
Maybe ITV should start running adverts for Eastenders

Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again
Posted: 06 Feb 2009, 03:53
by fluxstuff
Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Hagler2002 wrote:Can't really blame them, why advertise someone they don't broadcast.
Then don't claim to be a sports news service.
Yes they do. They call it Sky Sports News.
Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again
Posted: 06 Feb 2009, 04:10
by MightyWarrior
fluxstuff wrote:Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Hagler2002 wrote:Can't really blame them, why advertise someone they don't broadcast.
Then don't claim to be a sports news service.
Yes they do. They call it Sky Sports News.
Yes...we know
They're a bunch of grade A tosspots, reminds me why I cancelled.
So, don't report Calzaghe's retirment, a man they made millions off, because his future fights aren't on Sky? Well they're not on fekking anywhere else either. A sad excuse for a "news channel"
Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again
Posted: 06 Feb 2009, 05:00
by Hagler2002
Errr they did report it on the TV and here
http://tinyurl.com/d3xke2
Some people will twist on 21

Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again
Posted: 06 Feb 2009, 05:44
by Lenny
I'm sure I was watching Sky Sports News when they talked about Calzaghe's retirement for quite a while and asked viewers to let them know if he was one of the greatest of all time, using that trendy pound for pound phase and generally being very nice about him.
What more do you want? For a non football story it got as much coverage on SSN as most other big news.
Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again
Posted: 06 Feb 2009, 05:46
by Adamj1987
the breaking news on ssn lasts all of 10 min usually
Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again
Posted: 06 Feb 2009, 07:44
by DavidPayne
Joe Calzaghe retiring is not as noteworthy as Ken getting hot under the cravat about Stephanie Beacham.
He's a great fighter with an average c.v.
I'll miss him but I still miss Benn, Lewis and Hamed more.
Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again
Posted: 06 Feb 2009, 08:02
by stujones
Well as JC was techincally I guess not a Setanta fighter as of the news - then I guess Sky should have mentioned it.
Sky Sports News coverage of boxing can be odd... they really did mention Holyfield vs Valuev alot - but then Peter vs Klitchsko didn't exist.
Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again
Posted: 06 Feb 2009, 08:06
by gobbles
Terence wrote:It was on SSN. It was still running on the ticker throughout the night. What did people expect? A mock funeral and a river of tears? Joe Calzaghe retiring is not as newsworthy as, say, Lewis or Tyson retiring.
Is it more news worthy than the Swansea City manager being made Championship manager of the month, which got a five min segment?
It's meant to be a 24-hour sports news channel, but it has an agenda to push its own sports. BBC ran it in the headlines of the 6 o'clock news, but Sky Sports News, which claims to be a sports news channel, passes over it completely. What a disgrace.
Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again
Posted: 06 Feb 2009, 08:27
by stujones
Plus the fact that it was on the cards - it was hardly a major news story. A bit like Marco Antonio Barrera's 2007 retirement. It was more like a confermation more than anything else.
With Lewis - there was geniune talk of Klitchsko rematch. With Mike Tyson there was no hint of retirment before the McBride fight.
Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again
Posted: 07 Feb 2009, 14:33
by nobby_nobbins
I was glad to see that Calzaghe's retirement was one of the top news stories on BBC World Service Radio - not just left for the sport insert.
Re: Sky Sports and their ignorance again
Posted: 07 Feb 2009, 16:24
by MR UNTOUCHABLE
I doubt very much that SKY made millions off of Joe. Doubt it very much indeed!