Page 1 of 19

Modern Day Bare Knucklers

Posted: 13 Feb 2009, 15:05
by HomicideHenry
Macale Merton (Michale Merton), reigned as middleweight bare knuckle champ 30 years. Applies for boxing license at the age of 51 in the hopes to fight Marvin Hagler, but was denied. Merton claimed with a six inch punch he could break a mans arm.

Lenny McLean, often referred to as the 'hardest' man in all of Great Britain, is probably best remembered for an international bare knuckle brawl with John McCormack who claimed to be the toughest man in New York. Among those in attendance were Sylvester Stallone who proclaimed that McLean was the real Rocky.

Michael Gordon Peterson aka Charles Bronson, more known as Britain's most violent prisoner, also had a short lived bare knuckle career, and was even under McLean's guidance. There is a video of him facing an amateur boxer on YouTube, but he was DQ'd when a gun some how fell into the ring from Bronson's corner.

Perhaps Kimbo Slice is the most famous in recent years, but the question I have is this:

Where is the lineage for these men? Who did they beat to become champ, or are they just proclamining themselves as being champions?

Re: Modern Day Bare Knucklers

Posted: 13 Feb 2009, 15:46
by ringsider
They are nothing but Zellenoff types. They have no claim on anything.......

And as hard as it is to say this, Hagler would have killed that street fighting bum..... :box:

Re: Modern Day Bare Knucklers

Posted: 13 Feb 2009, 17:17
by dr_devious
Hagler would serve those guys

Re: Modern Day Bare Knucklers

Posted: 13 Feb 2009, 22:18
by Robinson
ringsider wrote:They are nothing but Zellenoff types. They have no claim on anything.......

And as hard as it is to say this, Hagler would have killed that street fighting bum..... :box:
Thats harsh...for all their faults atleast these guys do train, and get in their and mix
it up.

They fight at their level against other thug types and those that thrive in the under
belly of 'illlegal' fights.

Re: Modern Day Bare Knucklers

Posted: 13 Feb 2009, 22:23
by Robinson
These guys thrive in Gypsy settlements and other minority group communties
to some it is a cultural sport...to others it is a stamp of man hood and a way
for criminal elements to exercise influence and make money on gambling etc.

Lets not forget that these types, started our great sport. One does not need
to fight the best around to be a champ...but he just needs to fight whomever
is around at the time.

With proper professional sports ie boxing, mma etc these sports are relegated to
fad mediums such as You Tube, under world elements, back yards, gangland
settings or as I above mentioned community groups.

I personally have had two organised ;bare knuckle' fights. Nothing special and
nothing impressive. Tough guys that push more steel than flesh always get it
in there heads that they can beat on others with ease.

Personally training to fight another well trained athlete-fighter in a sanctioned,
open arena is always alot harder than 'bare knuckle' bouts of this nature.

Re: Modern Day Bare Knucklers

Posted: 13 Feb 2009, 22:41
by tennessee
smokin bert cooper fought joe savage who had 42 bare knuckle contests with all ko's in first round, and man he got embaresed by cooper

Re: Modern Day Bare Knucklers

Posted: 13 Feb 2009, 22:58
by Robinson
And what an entertaining blow out it was too....shame we dont have better
footage of it :(

Re: Modern Day Bare Knucklers

Posted: 13 Feb 2009, 23:57
by HomicideHenry
Joe Savage was reported to be the undefeated bareknuckle champion of Great Britian. Savage looked the part; shaved head, powerful arms, and numerous tattooes. He claimed the legendary underground title as World Heavyweight Bareknuckle Champion, and boasted a record of 42-0 with 42 knockouts.

According to an interview in a Great Britian newspaper, Savage said he was forced to retire from bareknuckle boxing because his ear had almost been torn completely off. The ear was re-attached, but Savage's no-holds barred career was over.

In 1993, Savage decided to try his hand at professional boxing. He entered the People's Choice One-Night Heavyweight Tournament on December 3, 1993, but pulled out at the last moment.

He did venture into pro boxing a short time later, but was quickly dispatched in the first round by former heavyweight contender Bert Cooper in April 1994. Savage then vanished from the scene.

Savage reportedly works as a bodyguard and a trainer of bareknuckle fighters in Great Britian.
He sure as hell had balls to step into the ring with Cooper who had over 45 professional bouts in his debut. FFS it's practically on par with Rademacher going up against Patterson, or Jack Finnegan going up against Jim Jefferies. I wonder, if this man retired undefeated as Britain's bare knuckle champion in 1992-1993, who became the next champion?

Never seen footage of this encounter, but I have seen a poor film of Charles Bronson (Michael Peterson) following his short lived release from prison duking it out with some amateur whom I never heard of and beat the man pillar to post before getting disqualified.

Re: Modern Day Bare Knucklers

Posted: 14 Feb 2009, 00:11
by allworld80
I've seen Mclean's unlicensed boxing matches, but not the bareknuckle stuff. Any footage exist?

Re: Modern Day Bare Knucklers

Posted: 14 Feb 2009, 00:21
by Robinson
HomicideHenry wrote:
Joe Savage was reported to be the undefeated bareknuckle champion of Great Britian. Savage looked the part; shaved head, powerful arms, and numerous tattooes. He claimed the legendary underground title as World Heavyweight Bareknuckle Champion, and boasted a record of 42-0 with 42 knockouts.

According to an interview in a Great Britian newspaper, Savage said he was forced to retire from bareknuckle boxing because his ear had almost been torn completely off. The ear was re-attached, but Savage's no-holds barred career was over.

In 1993, Savage decided to try his hand at professional boxing. He entered the People's Choice One-Night Heavyweight Tournament on December 3, 1993, but pulled out at the last moment.

He did venture into pro boxing a short time later, but was quickly dispatched in the first round by former heavyweight contender Bert Cooper in April 1994. Savage then vanished from the scene.

Savage reportedly works as a bodyguard and a trainer of bareknuckle fighters in Great Britian.
He sure as hell had balls to step into the ring with Cooper who had over 45 professional bouts in his debut. FFS it's practically on par with Rademacher going up against Patterson, or Jack Finnegan going up against Jim Jefferies. I wonder, if this man retired undefeated as Britain's bare knuckle champion in 1992-1993, who became the next champion?

Never seen footage of this encounter, but I have seen a poor film of Charles Bronson (Michael Peterson) following his short lived release from prison duking it out with some amateur whom I never heard of and beat the man pillar to post before getting disqualified.
Except Rademacher fought real people......the trouble with these bare knuckle champs is that no
one ever getrs to see there fights or can verify these claims.

Re: Modern Day Bare Knucklers

Posted: 14 Feb 2009, 00:23
by Robinson
tzyuforever wrote:I've seen Mclean's unlicensed boxing matches, but not the bareknuckle stuff. Any footage exist?
Closest ive come across is on YouTube is him commentating on some Gypsy bare knuckle
bouts.

Re: Modern Day Bare Knucklers

Posted: 14 Feb 2009, 16:16
by HomicideHenry
McLean was a bad mother fornicator, thats for sure. I think he would have taken Kimbo Slice and Joe Savage out on the same night. His kayo of Roy Shaw was brutal. I seen a clip of him fighting some man named Gypsy Bradshaw and kayoed him with a single blow after McLean was head butted. Of course, McLean continued his assault on the man even after he was knocked out.

You just didn't want to piss off The Guv'nor :shame:

Re: Modern Day Bare Knucklers

Posted: 14 Feb 2009, 16:25
by yiddo14
I have a few of McLean and Shaw's fights on DVD.
Shaw had more talent but was ancient by the time he started unlicensed fighintg(almost pushing 40) He was a promising pro apparently and was managed by Mickey Duff to 10 straight wins at a much lighter weight than when he fought unlicensed later in life(he is barely 5'9 but fought giants like McLean)

McLean got pole axed a couple of times by mediocre pro's. Cliff Fields knocked him sparko in one round on two occasions.

These guys are tough, bar room brawling specialists, but would get crushed againt even average pro Boxers, let alone the top guys.
Still, they are quite a colourful bunch and provide a bit of entertainment!

Re: Modern Day Bare Knucklers

Posted: 14 Feb 2009, 16:34
by yiddo14
Robinson wrote:These guys thrive in Gypsy settlements and other minority group communties
to some it is a cultural sport...to others it is a stamp of man hood and a way
for criminal elements to exercise influence and make money on gambling etc.

Lets not forget that these types, started our great sport. One does not need
to fight the best around to be a champ...but he just needs to fight whomever
is around at the time.

With proper professional sports ie boxing, mma etc these sports are relegated to
fad mediums such as You Tube, under world elements, back yards, gangland
settings or as I above mentioned community groups.

I personally have had two organised ;bare knuckle' fights. Nothing special and
nothing impressive. Tough guys that push more steel than flesh always get it
in there heads that they can beat on others with ease.

Personally training to fight another well trained athlete-fighter in a sanctioned,
open arena is always alot harder than 'bare knuckle' bouts of this nature.
These types didn't start Boxing Robisnon.
Looking at the early practioners of bare knuckle "boxing", these were educated men who often had their own gyms where they trained in other types of combat, most notably fencing.
Also, back in them days bare knuckle was the only option, so the cream of the fighters had no other choice. Todays so called bare knuckle champs choose to stay out of the pro game because they are not skilled enough to be a success.

Re: Modern Day Bare Knucklers

Posted: 14 Feb 2009, 16:41
by HomicideHenry
I tend to lean more in agreement with Robinson on this one. Even today, many of the men of olden times, you cant find all their fights because it was all illegal. It all started with these types, and survived by these types, until modern boxing all but killed it off. Jem Mace wasnt called THE GYPSY for nothing now, and hes considered the father of modern boxing. Still, none the less, personally, I'd rather watch these unlicensed fights than I would a ppv.

They should bring it back to the main stream.

Re: Modern Day Bare Knucklers

Posted: 14 Feb 2009, 19:41
by Robinson
yiddo14 wrote:
Robinson wrote:These guys thrive in Gypsy settlements and other minority group communties
to some it is a cultural sport...to others it is a stamp of man hood and a way
for criminal elements to exercise influence and make money on gambling etc.

Lets not forget that these types, started our great sport. One does not need
to fight the best around to be a champ...but he just needs to fight whomever
is around at the time.

With proper professional sports ie boxing, mma etc these sports are relegated to
fad mediums such as You Tube, under world elements, back yards, gangland
settings or as I above mentioned community groups.

I personally have had two organised ;bare knuckle' fights. Nothing special and
nothing impressive. Tough guys that push more steel than flesh always get it
in there heads that they can beat on others with ease.

Personally training to fight another well trained athlete-fighter in a sanctioned,
open arena is always alot harder than 'bare knuckle' bouts of this nature.
These types didn't start Boxing Robisnon.
Looking at the early practioners of bare knuckle "boxing", these were educated men who often had their own gyms where they trained in other types of combat, most notably fencing.
Also, back in them days bare knuckle was the only option, so the cream of the fighters had no other choice. Todays so called bare knuckle champs choose to stay out of the pro game because they are not skilled enough to be a success.

In England for the most part yes, but do you think they were the rule or the exception.

Men like Figg, Burke, John Jackson etc rose above the ranks of the others in fame and
success because they were educated, and refined the sport.

Do you think Sullivan was anything more than one a tough guy with a bad attitude that
liked to drink and swing ? He is heralded as a fore father of the sport, but glory to
him was in the bottiom of a bottle and in stomping other men, in or out of the ring.

I have not come across any reading material of Sullivan to make me think he was anything
more than a bare knuckle ruffian that was better than his contemporaries.

Re: Modern Day Bare Knucklers

Posted: 14 Feb 2009, 19:41
by Robinson
yiddo14 wrote:
Robinson wrote:These guys thrive in Gypsy settlements and other minority group communties
to some it is a cultural sport...to others it is a stamp of man hood and a way
for criminal elements to exercise influence and make money on gambling etc.

Lets not forget that these types, started our great sport. One does not need
to fight the best around to be a champ...but he just needs to fight whomever
is around at the time.

With proper professional sports ie boxing, mma etc these sports are relegated to
fad mediums such as You Tube, under world elements, back yards, gangland
settings or as I above mentioned community groups.

I personally have had two organised ;bare knuckle' fights. Nothing special and
nothing impressive. Tough guys that push more steel than flesh always get it
in there heads that they can beat on others with ease.

Personally training to fight another well trained athlete-fighter in a sanctioned,
open arena is always alot harder than 'bare knuckle' bouts of this nature.
These types didn't start Boxing Robisnon.
Looking at the early practioners of bare knuckle "boxing", these were educated men who often had their own gyms where they trained in other types of combat, most notably fencing.
Also, back in them days bare knuckle was the only option, so the cream of the fighters had no other choice. Todays so called bare knuckle champs choose to stay out of the pro game because they are not skilled enough to be a success.

Re: Modern Day Bare Knucklers

Posted: 14 Feb 2009, 19:48
by Robinson
HomicideHenry wrote:I tend to lean more in agreement with Robinson on this one. Even today, many of the men of olden times, you cant find all their fights because it was all illegal. It all started with these types, and survived by these types, until modern boxing all but killed it off. Jem Mace wasnt called THE GYPSY for nothing now, and hes considered the father of modern boxing. Still, none the less, personally, I'd rather watch these unlicensed fights than I would a ppv.

They should bring it back to the main stream.
In refining the sport it has improved for the viewer and the fighter.

Sure the spectacle of bare knuckle fighting is intriguing and exciting
but for the most part it lacks the edge, skill and over all talent of
modern boxing.

In boxing the hands are the most valued possesion of the boxer, that
is why they spend so much time on wrapping and paying people to look
after them....

it is for this very reason that bare knucklers do not last that long as far
as career's go nor do they have as many validated verifiable fights as
gloved fighters.

The thing with illegal and unlicensed is one can say they had 300 wins
and look menacing...who is to argue or dispute that....no one would
know....becuase its 'illegal' and hidden we can not prove or disprove it..

ON top of that...300 wins over drunk bums is not even remotely as good
as a draw against the even average of journeymen pro's.

In my own bare knuckle experiences one of the gent's I had the pleasure of
mixing it with was boasting 15 wins to no losses, all by 'brutal KO'...the guy
looked the part...6' 220lbs, arm tat's from wrist to neck..the usual shit...any how
he fell after a few seconds after he ate a right hand...no defence, he had nothing
that resembled an average amateur....he had image and bravado.

Did he really have 15 fights....I doubt it and if he did what were they against, fellow
retards ? Just look at Kimbo slice....most of the men he faces have no idea how
to 'box' or fight...that is why he does so well...he had better skills behind his massive
menacing frame.

Bare knuckle fighting is not as sexy or as 'cool' in the flesh as YouTube and
boxing folklore would have you believe. It is dirty, seedy, and illegal and can
get bloody.

Using MMA...who really believed Rickson Gracie was 400-0 or that Mario
Sperry was 270-1 in bare knuckle vale tudo fights and if they were how
come they had no film ?? or photos.

Most of these guys build their reps on BS, intimidation, street folklore and
the few bouts they do have.

Re: Modern Day Bare Knucklers

Posted: 14 Feb 2009, 23:25
by HomicideHenry
In my own bare knuckle experiences one of the gent's I had the pleasure of
mixing it with was boasting 15 wins to no losses, all by 'brutal KO'...the guy
looked the part...6' 220lbs, arm tat's from wrist to neck..the usual shit...any how
he fell after a few seconds after he ate a right hand...no defence, he had nothing
that resembled an average amateur....he had image and bravado.
I had a similar experience once. The one thing I notice too often from bar room brawlers, street fighter types, are that every punch is not only written with TNT on it, but can be seen from a mile away, just too wild and drawn too far back, can be easily ducked and/or countered. I boxed a man who was every bit of 6'4" and probably 180 pounds, to my then 5'8" and 160 pounds. He had a reputation for being not someone to mess with, but all his punches were looping and I was able to get inside rather easily and dropped him after a few hard solar plexus shots.

I remember the first time I saw the importance of a jab or a straight right hand too. I never thought that such a move that required such little force, could actually knock a man for a loop or on his ass when he aint expecting it.
Most of these guys build their reps on BS, intimidation, street folklore and
the few bouts they do have.
A bit like the lack of evidence for alot of the early 20th century boxers, eh? I cant say just because nobody has evidence for it, doesnt mean it didnt happen. It would be nice to have it, yes, but sometimes belief is all it takes for something to be real. Kinda like your hypothesis that all it takes to be successful in bare knuckle brawling is to have an image...it happens in boxing as well, where opponents are already defeated before the bell, like Spinks was against Tyson. If you are believed to be invincible, then you'll never lose, there will always be that sense of disbelief in your opponent that will make themselves doubt their own abilities.

Sometimes this is thrown to the wind, with Ali some how defeating George Foreman. Foreman may have believed himself to be invincible, as did most everyone else, but Ali didn't believe that he was unbeatable. I believe boxing, or any form of fighting, to be virtually 90% mental. That other 10% is just conditioning and minimal effort.

Re: Modern Day Bare Knucklers

Posted: 14 Feb 2009, 23:34
by HomicideHenry
Btw, I seen the Savage fight with Cooper. Savage had to have had at least a hell of a punch, as he did manage to knock Cooper back some several feet, before Cooper came charging back and knocking him out....the bare knuckle guys, the real good ones anyways, I equate to the MMA strikers, who train extensively for focus and to have one punch knock out power, cus you never know when the opprotunity will be there to punch.

Re: Modern Day Bare Knucklers

Posted: 15 Feb 2009, 00:31
by HomicideHenry
Bartley Gorman, is an interesting character. Evidentially Muhammad Ali was so impressed with the stories he heard of about the 'King of The Gypsies' he even sparred with him. Gorman was champion evidentially from 1972-1992, though til his dying die he never quite said he was retired, his last fight of note was in 1997. I find it ironic, considering Ali was asked once if he would have boxed in John L. Sullivan's time and he said no, that it hurt too much, or something to that effect.

Its said both Shaw and McLean ducked him. He must have been one hard bastard.

Re: Modern Day Bare Knucklers

Posted: 15 Feb 2009, 00:37
by Robinson
HomicideHenry wrote:Btw, I seen the Savage fight with Cooper. Savage had to have had at least a hell of a punch, as he did manage to knock Cooper back some several feet, before Cooper came charging back and knocking him out....the bare knuckle guys, the real good ones anyways, I equate to the MMA strikers, who train extensively for focus and to have one punch knock out power, cus you never know when the opprotunity will be there to punch.
In MMA you widen your hips so you can shoot, sprawl and counter the clinch and
take down.
Not to mention kick, leg check etc...

the fundamentals have to be adapted.

I think Savage just rushed Cooper, its hard to tell from the footage, but I dont thnk
Bert was too worried. Was most likely the easiest half round Cooper ever had.

Re: Modern Day Bare Knucklers

Posted: 15 Feb 2009, 00:39
by Robinson
HomicideHenry wrote:Bartley Gorman, is an interesting character. Evidentially Muhammad Ali was so impressed with the stories he heard of about the 'King of The Gypsies' he even sparred with him. Gorman was champion evidentially from 1972-1992, though til his dying die he never quite said he was retired, his last fight of note was in 1997. I find it ironic, considering Ali was asked once if he would have boxed in John L. Sullivan's time and he said no, that it hurt too much, or something to that effect.

Its said both Shaw and McLean ducked him. He must have been one hard bastard.
I have heard similar stories..but sadly they are just that stories.

It is ashame that we can not get our hands on any of Bartley's fights...just clips of him
that are on YT. He does seem like a nice enough gent for a hard nosed brawler.

Re: Modern Day Bare Knucklers

Posted: 15 Feb 2009, 00:43
by Collins2000
HomicideHenry wrote:Bartley Gorman, is an interesting character. Evidentially Muhammad Ali was so impressed with the stories he heard of about the 'King of The Gypsies' he even sparred with him. Gorman was champion evidentially from 1972-1992, though til his dying die he never quite said he was retired, his last fight of note was in 1997. I find it ironic, considering Ali was asked once if he would have boxed in John L. Sullivan's time and he said no, that it hurt too much, or something to that effect.

Its said both Shaw and McLean ducked him. He must have been one hard bastard.

When was the Gorman - Ali sparring session(s), Rupert?

Re: Modern Day Bare Knucklers

Posted: 15 Feb 2009, 00:47
by Collins2000
HomicideHenry wrote:
In my own bare knuckle experiences one of the gent's I had the pleasure of
mixing it with was boasting 15 wins to no losses, all by 'brutal KO'...the guy
looked the part...6' 220lbs, arm tat's from wrist to neck..the usual shit...any how
he fell after a few seconds after he ate a right hand...no defence, he had nothing
that resembled an average amateur....he had image and bravado.
I had a similar experience once. The one thing I notice too often from bar room brawlers, street fighter types, are that every punch is not only written with TNT on it, but can be seen from a mile away, just too wild and drawn too far back, can be easily ducked and/or countered. I boxed a man who was every bit of 6'4" and probably 180 pounds, to my then 5'8" and 160 pounds. He had a reputation for being not someone to mess with, but all his punches were looping and I was able to get inside rather easily and dropped him after a few hard solar plexus shots.
Rupert, were you inspired by that old Brit movie "Billy Liar"?