How many great boxing trainers are there?
Posted: 25 Feb 2009, 16:34
Some recent performances have got me wondering how many great technical boxing coaches there are. I'd be very interested to hear your observations / experiences.
A few recent fights have shown some elite fighters as inadequate in some of the fundamentals of boxing - Vitali K is very limited in his ability to throw combos (whilst Sam Peter was unable to do anything...), Margarito showed a woeful inability to avoid / block a right hand. These fighters have been successful despite such deficiencies but I can't think of other individual sports where you can win the top prizes with such glaring areas of weakness in basic skills. Granted, individuals will always have relative strengths and weaknesses, but I can't imagine a tennis player winning a grand slam, for example, with shots in their arsenal that are inept.
I understand that a fighter's strengths can allow them to get away with such weaknesses to a degree, but I would have thought a trainer should be sorting them out in the gym otherwise the fighter can never reach their full potential. Are there not enough trainers capable of developing a fighter with solid basics? Is there a culture of 'if it ain't broke don't fix it' until the fighter loses?
I am often frustrated hearing trainers telling fighters in the corner to 'take control' or 'don't let him dominate' without offering any technical advice that the fighter can implement.
So, what do you think? Generally speaking does boxing have enough 'elite' technical coaches?
A few recent fights have shown some elite fighters as inadequate in some of the fundamentals of boxing - Vitali K is very limited in his ability to throw combos (whilst Sam Peter was unable to do anything...), Margarito showed a woeful inability to avoid / block a right hand. These fighters have been successful despite such deficiencies but I can't think of other individual sports where you can win the top prizes with such glaring areas of weakness in basic skills. Granted, individuals will always have relative strengths and weaknesses, but I can't imagine a tennis player winning a grand slam, for example, with shots in their arsenal that are inept.
I understand that a fighter's strengths can allow them to get away with such weaknesses to a degree, but I would have thought a trainer should be sorting them out in the gym otherwise the fighter can never reach their full potential. Are there not enough trainers capable of developing a fighter with solid basics? Is there a culture of 'if it ain't broke don't fix it' until the fighter loses?
I am often frustrated hearing trainers telling fighters in the corner to 'take control' or 'don't let him dominate' without offering any technical advice that the fighter can implement.
So, what do you think? Generally speaking does boxing have enough 'elite' technical coaches?