BoxRec

Vitali has made a formal complaint to the Court of Arbitration for Sport due to the WBC implementing two mandatories in a row -
Gomez and Maskaev.
Says he wants Arreola or HAYE after Gomez.
Still a chance for a big night at the O2 ?

why not have haye arreola to keep busy then the winner can take on vitali from what iv heard haye and arreola dont get on

diggler wrote:why not have haye arreola to keep busy then the winner can take on vitali from what iv heard haye and arreola dont get on

Thats far too logical for boxing!

sure i read it somewhere they sparred in miami and it got heated if i remember rightly arreola took exception to hayes punches

They definitely sparred. A rumour is that Haye knocked Arreola down.

Edit: post number 6666

it looks like haye takes no prisoners in sparring judging by this and audleys comments during the week.

diggler wrote:why not have haye arreola to keep busy then the winner can take on vitali from what iv heard haye and arreola dont get on

Because if Haye-Wlad doesn't happen it'll probably be Arreola-Wlad

BIGMARK wrote:

Asterix wrote:They definitely sparred. A rumour is that Haye knocked Arreola down.

Edit: post number 6666

when was this?

I don't know. In the last couple of years.

jspain wrote:it looks like haye takes no prisoners in sparring judging by this and audleys comments during the week.

i remember a couple of years back garry delaney ko.d haye at the peacock during sparring thats why haye wouldn.t give delaney time to train when they boxed

Back on topic, while I think Maskaev as a mandatory is copmpletely bogus, his manager has a point when he accuses Vitali of hypocrisy in complaining about back-to-back mandatories - when he himself was the beneficiary of (and pushed for) exactly that!

As its the credit crunch he should solve the problem by doing a buy 1 get 1 free and fight them both on the same bill D Ofcourse even if possible the WBC wouldn't allow that as they'd only get 1 fee

oliverfennell wrote:Back on topic, while I think Maskaev as a mandatory is copmpletely bogus, his manager has a point when he accuses Vitali of hypocrisy in complaining about back-to-back mandatories - when he himself was the beneficiary of (and pushed for) exactly that!

Was Lennox-Vitali 1 a mando, thought it was a voluntary. Either way getting dominated by a man Vitali dominated shouldn't make you a mandatory

Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:

oliverfennell wrote:Back on topic, while I think Maskaev as a mandatory is copmpletely bogus, his manager has a point when he accuses Vitali of hypocrisy in complaining about back-to-back mandatories - when he himself was the beneficiary of (and pushed for) exactly that!

Was Lennox-Vitali 1 a mando, thought it was a voluntary. Either way getting dominated by a man Vitali dominated shouldn't make you a mandatory

I mean Vitali pushing for an immediate mandatory shot at the winner of Maskaev-Peter (who was the other mandatory).