Who's going to Vegas to see Hatton?
Posted: 26 Mar 2009, 07:50
Is he expected to take as many as before?
It will be full of w*nkers who no nothing about boxing and who believe that it will be for the P4P title, so for that reason I will definitely not be going.King Tubby wrote:Is he expected to take as many as before?
BIGMARK wrote:that is always a problem going to a Hatton fight because he attracts a lot of casual boxing fans. I have never been to Vegas and have wanted to for long while but i think i will look maybe look at a fight not involving a UK fighter because i know will enjoy it more.teddy007 wrote:It will be full of w*nkers who no nothing about boxing and who believe that it will be for the P4P title, so for that reason I will definitely not be going.King Tubby wrote:Is he expected to take as many as before?
DavidPayne wrote:You sound Peter Jones.
"You're a muppet, and for that reason I'm out."
I doubt many middle calss people follow boxing. I think is what he ment was that they are a loud bunch of idiots who may or may not look for trouble. You only ever notice them in big groups, get them in 2-3's and they shit themselves.chris s wrote:That is middle class snobbery in reference to your depression at seeing football shirt fans. Do boxing purists only have a right to go and watch Hatton. If you don't like going nobody is forcing you.
chris s wrote:That is middle class snobbery in reference to your depression at seeing football shirt fans. Do boxing purists only have a right to go and watch Hatton. If you don't like going nobody is forcing you.
Fair enough mate, and no one is denying you an opinion but in your initial post you stated that it was football shirts in bars you didn't approve of, not the aggressive nature of their behaviour or I wear a football shirt sometimes in a pub or abroad, but that doesn't make me some kind of meathead up for a row and to often.RLewis wrote:chris s wrote:That is middle class snobbery in reference to your depression at seeing football shirt fans. Do boxing purists only have a right to go and watch Hatton. If you don't like going nobody is forcing you.
Why is that middle class snobbery? Don't middle class people go to football? And do you even know what class I am? I'd be in the wrong business if I looked down on working class people.
There were lots of tales I heard of people who, when England didn't qualify for Euro 2008, decided to go to Vegas for the Mayweather fight instead. Believe it or not, as people in most cities in Europe could tell you, being stuck in a bar with 500 noisy and aggressive sounding football fans is not many people's idea of a nice night out.
Having seen all the bars "taken over" at a place like the MGM Grand, prior to the Mayweather fight, having been there when the Brit "fans" booed the US national anthem, having experienced the normally hugely helpful and polite staff being rude to you when they discover you are British, having been to a John Murray fight at the MGM Grand which was attended by about 200 of the 50,000 Brits said to be in Vegas, having seen the normally low key security become really visible, I have as much right to my opinion as you.
It's nothing to do with class, and your inverse snobbery says plenty. When I to see the Scott Hayward-Dean Harrison fight in Nottingham which kicked off in the bar when half were wearing Wolves gear and half Derby County gear, I found that depressing too. Introducing football rivalry into boxing always works badly. Indeed after a riot in Rotherham a few years ago saw a bill scrapped, there was talk of football shirts being banned at boxing venues, just like at pubs which say "no colours".
It won't be the same for Hatton-Pacquiao, because the majority of people who travel will be wanting to go to watch the boxing, not for a mass rowdy party.
Of course there is no problem wearing a football shirt, as for many it is a sign of local identity. However, there is a difference between some guys wearing a football shirt and 300 people in a bar all wearing football shirts. It also showed a change in atmosphere from boxing audience to football crowd.chris s wrote:Fair enough mate, and no one is denying you an opinion but in your initial post you stated that it was football shirts in bars you didn't approve of, not the aggressive nature of their behaviour or I wear a football shirt sometimes in a pub or abroad, but that doesn't make me some kind of meathead up for a row and to often.RLewis wrote:chris s wrote:That is middle class snobbery in reference to your depression at seeing football shirt fans. Do boxing purists only have a right to go and watch Hatton. If you don't like going nobody is forcing you.
Why is that middle class snobbery? Don't middle class people go to football? And do you even know what class I am? I'd be in the wrong business if I looked down on working class people.
There were lots of tales I heard of people who, when England didn't qualify for Euro 2008, decided to go to Vegas for the Mayweather fight instead. Believe it or not, as people in most cities in Europe could tell you, being stuck in a bar with 500 noisy and aggressive sounding football fans is not many people's idea of a nice night out.
Having seen all the bars "taken over" at a place like the MGM Grand, prior to the Mayweather fight, having been there when the Brit "fans" booed the US national anthem, having experienced the normally hugely helpful and polite staff being rude to you when they discover you are British, having been to a John Murray fight at the MGM Grand which was attended by about 200 of the 50,000 Brits said to be in Vegas, having seen the normally low key security become really visible, I have as much right to my opinion as you.
It's nothing to do with class, and your inverse snobbery says plenty. When I to see the Scott Hayward-Dean Harrison fight in Nottingham which kicked off in the bar when half were wearing Wolves gear and half Derby County gear, I found that depressing too. Introducing football rivalry into boxing always works badly. Indeed after a riot in Rotherham a few years ago saw a bill scrapped, there was talk of football shirts being banned at boxing venues, just like at pubs which say "no colours".
It won't be the same for Hatton-Pacquiao, because the majority of people who travel will be wanting to go to watch the boxing, not for a mass rowdy party.
teddy007 wrote:It will be full of w*nkers who no nothing about boxing and who believe that it will be for the P4P title, so for that reason I will definitely not be going.King Tubby wrote:Is he expected to take as many as before?
25 April, some resort in Conneticut. UK tv channel still TBCNorthEastBoxingFan wrote: I hope Frochy keeps his belt, I would like to see him in Nottingham again, went versus Tatevosyan, quality.
Can someone advise me of the date of this fight, where, what channel if it's no trouble, or just the date would be good.
excellent post mate. i followed Harrison from the beginning and it was always a matter of time before his fans ended up causing aggro. i've heard a load of ignorant abusive and racist shite from themRLewis wrote:chris s wrote:That is middle class snobbery in reference to your depression at seeing football shirt fans. Do boxing purists only have a right to go and watch Hatton. If you don't like going nobody is forcing you.
Why is that middle class snobbery? Don't middle class people go to football? And do you even know what class I am? I'd be in the wrong business if I looked down on working class people.
There were lots of tales I heard of people who, when England didn't qualify for Euro 2008, decided to go to Vegas for the Mayweather fight instead. Believe it or not, as people in most cities in Europe could tell you, being stuck in a bar with 500 noisy and aggressive sounding football fans is not many people's idea of a nice night out.
Having seen all the bars "taken over" at a place like the MGM Grand, prior to the Mayweather fight, having been there when the Brit "fans" booed the US national anthem, having experienced the normally hugely helpful and polite staff being rude to you when they discover you are British, having been to a John Murray fight at the MGM Grand which was attended by about 200 of the 50,000 Brits said to be in Vegas, having seen the normally low key security become really visible, I have as much right to my opinion as you.
It's nothing to do with class, and your inverse snobbery says plenty. When I to see the Scott Hayward-Dean Harrison fight in Nottingham which kicked off in the bar when half were wearing Wolves gear and half Derby County gear, I found that depressing too. Introducing football rivalry into boxing always works badly. Indeed after a riot in Rotherham a few years ago saw a bill scrapped, there was talk of football shirts being banned at boxing venues, just like at pubs which say "no colours".
It won't be the same for Hatton-Pacquiao, because the majority of people who travel will be wanting to go to watch the boxing, not for a mass rowdy party.
I think they're banned (football shirts) at the Odyssey in Belfast where DeGale and the others are on.Counter-puncher wrote:excellent post mate. i followed Harrison from the beginning and it was always a matter of time before his fans ended up causing aggro. i've heard a load of ignorant abusive and racist shite from themRLewis wrote:chris s wrote:That is middle class snobbery in reference to your depression at seeing football shirt fans. Do boxing purists only have a right to go and watch Hatton. If you don't like going nobody is forcing you.
Why is that middle class snobbery? Don't middle class people go to football? And do you even know what class I am? I'd be in the wrong business if I looked down on working class people.
There were lots of tales I heard of people who, when England didn't qualify for Euro 2008, decided to go to Vegas for the Mayweather fight instead. Believe it or not, as people in most cities in Europe could tell you, being stuck in a bar with 500 noisy and aggressive sounding football fans is not many people's idea of a nice night out.
Having seen all the bars "taken over" at a place like the MGM Grand, prior to the Mayweather fight, having been there when the Brit "fans" booed the US national anthem, having experienced the normally hugely helpful and polite staff being rude to you when they discover you are British, having been to a John Murray fight at the MGM Grand which was attended by about 200 of the 50,000 Brits said to be in Vegas, having seen the normally low key security become really visible, I have as much right to my opinion as you.
It's nothing to do with class, and your inverse snobbery says plenty. When I to see the Scott Hayward-Dean Harrison fight in Nottingham which kicked off in the bar when half were wearing Wolves gear and half Derby County gear, I found that depressing too. Introducing football rivalry into boxing always works badly. Indeed after a riot in Rotherham a few years ago saw a bill scrapped, there was talk of football shirts being banned at boxing venues, just like at pubs which say "no colours".
It won't be the same for Hatton-Pacquiao, because the majority of people who travel will be wanting to go to watch the boxing, not for a mass rowdy party.
fortunatley as someone else says they are basically cowards. during Eastman - Ashira, ONE bloke shut all 40 or so of them up, as soon as they got challenged they collectively dropped their bottle.
I wear them now and again but I wouldn't go to a boxing card wearing one.King Tubby wrote:It's a bit strange for grown men to be wearing replica football shirts under any circumstances, unless they're playing football.
Ditto.Terry D wrote:I wear them a lot. They are comfy, feel nice and dry quickly. I am no hooligan.King Tubby wrote:It's a bit strange for grown men to be wearing replica football shirts under any circumstances, unless they're playing football.