Page 1 of 1
Re: FROCH-TAYLOR A TRIPLE HEADER
Posted: 30 Mar 2009, 19:58
by josh fg
Sigh this country annoys me Ricky Hatton can defend the WBU title 16 times and be on television for all of them and someone who wins british commonwealth and then the WBC title can't get TV coverage. Its no wonder fighters end up taking that tired cynical rout!
Re: FROCH-TAYLOR A TRIPLE HEADER
Posted: 30 Mar 2009, 20:16
by Asterix
BIGMARK wrote:i would imagine Tyson Fury will be on the bill somewhere fighting tomato can (as he should at this stage)
I'd like to see Tyson Fury in with a big guy (tall and strong, not fat). He is on the bill:
http://www.boxrec.com/show_display.php?show_id=572165
2006 Golden Gloves champion Edwin "La Bomba" Rodriguez is also on the bill.
Re: FROCH-TAYLOR A TRIPLE HEADER
Posted: 31 Mar 2009, 04:54
by Maxime
josh fg wrote:Sigh this country annoys me Ricky Hatton can defend the WBU title 16 times and be on television for all of them and someone who wins british commonwealth and then the WBC title can't get TV coverage. Its no wonder fighters end up taking that tired cynical rout!
Did you ever stop to think that maybe Mister Hennessey is asking for too much money?
Re: FROCH-TAYLOR A TRIPLE HEADER
Posted: 31 Mar 2009, 05:56
by states
josh fg wrote:Sigh this country annoys me Ricky Hatton can defend the WBU title 16 times and be on television for all of them and someone who wins british commonwealth and then the WBC title can't get TV coverage. Its no wonder fighters end up taking that tired cynical rout!
This is going to be on at 4 in the morning though. Obviously, I hope it's shown, but with Froch not being a huge star, I can understand why there's not been a rush to acquire the rights.
Re: FROCH-TAYLOR A TRIPLE HEADER
Posted: 31 Mar 2009, 08:19
by Twinkle Toes
Maxime wrote:josh fg wrote:Sigh this country annoys me Ricky Hatton can defend the WBU title 16 times and be on television for all of them and someone who wins british commonwealth and then the WBC title can't get TV coverage. Its no wonder fighters end up taking that tired cynical rout!
Did you ever stop to think that maybe Mister Hennessey is asking for too much money?
Exactly.
Last snippet of info I read was Hennessey was trying to get SKY to take it as a PPV - Some people might not be so happy when they have to shell out £15 to watch the fight.
Re: FROCH-TAYLOR A TRIPLE HEADER
Posted: 31 Mar 2009, 08:25
by jspain
Twinkle Toes wrote:Maxime wrote:josh fg wrote:Sigh this country annoys me Ricky Hatton can defend the WBU title 16 times and be on television for all of them and someone who wins british commonwealth and then the WBC title can't get TV coverage. Its no wonder fighters end up taking that tired cynical rout!
Did you ever stop to think that maybe Mister Hennessey is asking for too much money?
Exactly.
Last snippet of info I read was Hennessey was trying to get SKY to take it as a PPV - Some people might not be so happy when they have to shell out £15 to watch the fight.
yeah especially as hatton v pacman is ppv the week after. i hope froch is not ppv. it might well come down to a choice between the two for alot of people if froch is ppv as well.
Re: FROCH-TAYLOR A TRIPLE HEADER
Posted: 31 Mar 2009, 14:41
by Spud
Maxime wrote:josh fg wrote:Sigh this country annoys me Ricky Hatton can defend the WBU title 16 times and be on television for all of them and someone who wins british commonwealth and then the WBC title can't get TV coverage. Its no wonder fighters end up taking that tired cynical rout!
Did you ever stop to think that maybe Mister Hennessey is asking for too much money?
You are probably right - but this is just typical of Sky and Setanta to push to the last moment - offer a last minute thing when Hennessy will have to accept - it will happen I am sure but clearly Hennessy needs the media on side??
Did Taylor come over here for a press conference to generate any interest - I cant remember - if not - bad move by Hennessy!!!
Re: FROCH-TAYLOR A TRIPLE HEADER
Posted: 01 Apr 2009, 11:50
by chinny
Boxrec is now listing Paulie Malignagi and Dominick Guinn as fighting on this bill. Guinn's opponent is unbeaten but I don't recognise any of the names on his record
Saturday 25 April 2009
Foxwoods Resort Casino, Mashantucket, Connecticut, United States
commission: Mashantucket Pequot Athletic Commission
promoter: Lou DiBella : DiBella Entertainment
television: United States Showtime
12 super middleweight Carl Froch 24 (19) - 0 (0) - 0
SC Jermain Taylor 28 (17) - 2 (1) - 1
~ WBC super middleweight title ~
bout subject to commission approval / change
10 super middleweight Allan Green 27 (19) - 1 (0) - 0
SC Carlos De Leon Jr 21 (14) - 2 (1) - 2
bout subject to commission approval / change
10 light middleweight Vernon Forrest 41 (29) - 3 (1) - 0
SC Jason LeHoullier 21 (8) - 1 (0) - 1
bout subject to commission approval / change
10 heavyweight Dominick Guinn 30 (20) - 6 (0) - 1
SC Johnnie White 21 (18) - 0 (0) - 0
bout subject to commission approval / change
8 light welterweight Paul Malignaggi 25 (5) - 2 (1) - 0
SC ?
bout subject to commission approval / change
6 super middleweight Jonathan Nelson 8 (4) - 0 (0) - 0
SC ?
bout subject to commission approval / change
6 light welterweight Danny O'Connor 5 (2) - 0 (0) - 0
SC ?
bout subject to commission approval / change
4 heavyweight Tyson Fury 4 (4) - 0 (0) - 0
SC ?
bout subject to commission approval / change
Re: FROCH-TAYLOR A TRIPLE HEADER
Posted: 02 Apr 2009, 13:00
by chinny
damn it, Forrest's fight has been moved back a week and off this bill
Re: FROCH-TAYLOR A TRIPLE HEADER
Posted: 02 Apr 2009, 13:09
by Carbo
Twinkle Toes wrote:Maxime wrote:josh fg wrote:Sigh this country annoys me Ricky Hatton can defend the WBU title 16 times and be on television for all of them and someone who wins british commonwealth and then the WBC title can't get TV coverage. Its no wonder fighters end up taking that tired cynical rout!
Did you ever stop to think that maybe Mister Hennessey is asking for too much money?
Exactly.
Last snippet of info I read was Hennessey was trying to get SKY to take it as a PPV - Some people might not be so happy when they have to shell out £15 to watch the fight.
Yeah, and that's the problem: Too many people cry their eyes out when a big fight isn't on TV, but then moan and whinge when it's on PPV.
I would rather have the choice to see a great fight like this on PPV then not at all. If they can only make it economically viable on PPV, then it's better than no TV at all.
Re: FROCH-TAYLOR A TRIPLE HEADER
Posted: 02 Apr 2009, 13:30
by chinny
Terry D wrote:chinny wrote:damn it, Forrest's fight has been moved back a week and off this bill
F*ck it all!

was looking forward to seeing him fight in the flesh

Re: FROCH-TAYLOR A TRIPLE HEADER
Posted: 03 Apr 2009, 00:26
by Maxime
Paulie will replace him. lol