https://boxrec.com/wiki/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=BeechamBoxRec - User contributions [en]2026-06-11T22:52:04ZUser contributionsMediaWiki 1.38.2https://boxrec.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Beecham&diff=95736User talk:Beecham2007-01-11T23:31:53Z<p>Beecham: WHAT</p>
<hr />
<div>What's the deal "moving" one fight to another, by "moving" to another fight number? These are two totally different fights. I am reverting it back. --[[User:Ric|Ric]] 08:46, 11 January 2007 (CST)<br />
<br />
Once again, can you explain why you are moving fights from one number to another? --[[User:Ric|Ric]] 12:37, 11 January 2007 (CST)<br />
<p>My uncle was Beecham. I thought we can make the fight more appealing, also tell me why it should not be moved to better number?<br />
<br />
What do you mean make the fight "more appealing"? Are you saying that using a different number makes it more appealing? From what I can gather, it appears you thought that changing the fight number to the approximate date of the fight (1011956: Jan. 2, 1956) made it "more appealing." <br />
<br />
The fight numbers SHOULD NOT BE CHANGED. Each and every fight entered into the BoxRec database is assigned its own specific ID number. When you change the number, you are then referring to a completely different fight. Again, DO NOT CHANGE THE NUMBER by "moving" it to a different number. Since you are new here, you probably did not know fight and boxer numbers are identification numbers that SHOULD NEVER BE MOVED to a new number (with very few exceptions, such as correcting a mistake or over-riding a duplicate page). --[[User:Ric|Ric]] 14:25, 11 January 2007 (CST)<br />
<p>YOU MAKE NO SENSE AT ALL!</div>Beechamhttps://boxrec.com/wiki/index.php?title=Fight:52843&diff=95720Fight:528432007-01-11T19:56:40Z<p>Beecham: m</p>
<hr />
<div><fight>52843</fight><br />
<br />
Beecham of Miami stopped Rawliongs of Chicago by TKO.<br />
Ring physician refused to let Rawlings answer the bell for 9th round. Beecham was 155 lbs, Rawlings 151 lbs. Beecham was leading on all 3 score cards. This was the main event. Heavyweight Championship fight was originally scheduled for this day. After this victory Beecham was considered a contender for the middle weight crown.</div>Beechamhttps://boxrec.com/wiki/index.php?title=Fight:52843&diff=95719Fight:528432007-01-11T19:52:26Z<p>Beecham: </p>
<hr />
<div><fight>52843</fight><br />
<br />
Beecham of Miami stopped Rawliongs of Chicago by TKO.<br />
Ring physician refused to let Rawlings answer the bell for 9th round. Beecham was 155 lbs, Rawlings 151 lbs. Beecham was leading on all 3 score cards. This was the main event. Heavyweight Championship fight was originally scheduled for this day.</div>Beechamhttps://boxrec.com/wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Beecham&diff=95718User talk:Beecham2007-01-11T19:49:37Z<p>Beecham: good number</p>
<hr />
<div>What's the deal "moving" one fight to another, by "moving" to another fight number? These are two totally different fights. I am reverting it back. --[[User:Ric|Ric]] 08:46, 11 January 2007 (CST)<br />
<br />
Once again, can you explain why you are moving fights from one number to another? --[[User:Ric|Ric]] 12:37, 11 January 2007 (CST)<br />
<p>My uncle was Beecham. I thought we can make the fight more appealing, also tell me why it should not be moved to better number?</div>Beechamhttps://boxrec.com/wiki/index.php?title=Fight:52843&diff=95711Fight:528432007-01-11T17:25:20Z<p>Beecham: Fight:52843 moved to Fight:1011956: extra digit</p>
<hr />
<div>#REDIRECT [[Fight:1011956]]</div>Beecham