Fight:1982851 - Revision history

Wasserman: described Chip and Gibbons in more detail

2020-04-25T13:05:55Z

described Chip and Gibbons in more detail

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:05, 25 April 2020
Line 6:		Line 6:
	Connors, a Scranton boxer, dominated the bout, and would shortly fight [[Kid Norfolk]], whom Hollandersky had already met. Connors may have had weight on Hollandersky, and most certainly had a five inch advantage in height and reach. The article noted Connors won on a fifteen round points decision.		Connors, a Scranton boxer, dominated the bout, and would shortly fight [[Kid Norfolk]], whom Hollandersky had already met. Connors may have had weight on Hollandersky, and most certainly had a five inch advantage in height and reach. The article noted Connors won on a fifteen round points decision.

	Connors fought both George Chip, and Mike Gibbons in his career, though ~~losing~~ to both by newspaper decision.		Connors fought both George Chip, and Mike Gibbons, two great world middleweight contenders, in his career, though he lost to both by newspaper decision.

Wasserman at 23:53, 8 December 2016

2016-12-08T23:53:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:53, 8 December 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
			Fight 1982851
			Abe Hollandersky vs. Tommy Connors, Panama City Panama, April 26, 1914

	This fight was described in "Tommy Connors Wins From Panama Fighter in Fifteen Rounds", ''The Scranton Republican'', Scranton, Pennsylvania, pg. 14, 8 May 1914		This fight was described in "Tommy Connors Wins From Panama Fighter in Fifteen Rounds", ''The Scranton Republican'', Scranton, Pennsylvania, pg. 14, 8 May 1914

	Connors, a Scranton boxer, dominated the bout, and would shortly fight [[Kid Norfolk]], whom Hollandersky had already met. Connors may have had weight on Hollandersky, and most certainly had a five inch advantage in height and reach.		Connors, a Scranton boxer, dominated the bout, and would shortly fight [[Kid Norfolk]], whom Hollandersky had already met. Connors may have had weight on Hollandersky, and most certainly had a five inch advantage in height and reach. The article noted Connors won on a fifteen round points decision.

	Connors fought both George Chip, and Mike Gibbons, though losing to both by newspaper decision.		Connors fought both George Chip, and Mike Gibbons in his career, though losing to both by newspaper decision.

Wasserman at 17:22, 1 December 2016

2016-12-01T17:22:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:22, 1 December 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This fight was described in "Tommy Connors Wins From Panama Fighter in Fifteen Rounds", ''The Scranton Republican'', Scranton, Pennsylvania, pg. 14, 8 May 1914~~</ref>~~		This fight was described in "Tommy Connors Wins From Panama Fighter in Fifteen Rounds", ''The Scranton Republican'', Scranton, Pennsylvania, pg. 14, 8 May 1914

	Connors, a Scranton boxer, dominated the bout, and would shortly fight [[Kid Norfolk]], whom Hollandersky had already met. Connors may have had weight on Hollandersky, and most certainly had a five inch advantage in height and reach.		Connors, a Scranton boxer, dominated the bout, and would shortly fight [[Kid Norfolk]], whom Hollandersky had already met. Connors may have had weight on Hollandersky, and most certainly had a five inch advantage in height and reach.

	Connors fought both George Chip, and Mike Gibbons, though losing to both by newspaper decision.		Connors fought both George Chip, and Mike Gibbons, though losing to both by newspaper decision.

Wasserman at 17:21, 1 December 2016

2016-12-01T17:21:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:21, 1 December 2016
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Connors, a Scranton boxer, dominated the bout, and would shortly fight [[Kid Norfolk]], whom Hollandersky had already met. Connors may have had weight on Hollandersky, and most certainly had a five inch advantage in height and reach.		Connors, a Scranton boxer, dominated the bout, and would shortly fight [[Kid Norfolk]], whom Hollandersky had already met. Connors may have had weight on Hollandersky, and most certainly had a five inch advantage in height and reach.

	Connors ~~was reputed to have~~ fought both George Chip, and Mike Gibbons, though ~~probably~~ losing to both.		Connors fought both George Chip, and Mike Gibbons, though losing to both by newspaper decision.

Wasserman at 17:20, 1 December 2016

2016-12-01T17:20:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:20, 1 December 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This fight was described in "Tommy Connors Wins From Panama Fighter in Fifteen Rounds", ''The Scranton Republican'', Scranton, Pennsylvania, pg. 14, 8 May 1914</ref>		This fight was described in "Tommy Connors Wins From Panama Fighter in Fifteen Rounds", ''The Scranton Republican'', Scranton, Pennsylvania, pg. 14, 8 May 1914</ref>

	Connors, a Scranton boxer, dominated the bout, and would shortly fight [[Kid Norfolk]], whom Hollandersky had already met. Connors may have had weight on Hollandersky, and most certainly a five inch advantage in height and reach.		Connors, a Scranton boxer, dominated the bout, and would shortly fight [[Kid Norfolk]], whom Hollandersky had already met. Connors may have had weight on Hollandersky, and most certainly had a five inch advantage in height and reach.

			Connors was reputed to have fought both George Chip, and Mike Gibbons, though probably losing to both.

Wasserman: Created page with "This fight was described in "Tommy Connors Wins From Panama Fighter in Fifteen Rounds", ''The Scranton Republican'', Scranton, Pennsylvania, pg. 14, 8 May 1914 Connors,..."

2016-12-01T16:55:35Z

Created page with "This fight was described in "Tommy Connors Wins From Panama Fighter in Fifteen Rounds", ''The Scranton Republican'', Scranton, Pennsylvania, pg. 14, 8 May 1914</ref> Connors,..."

New page

This fight was described in "Tommy Connors Wins From Panama Fighter in Fifteen Rounds", ''The Scranton Republican'', Scranton, Pennsylvania, pg. 14, 8 May 1914</ref>

Connors, a Scranton boxer, dominated the bout, and would shortly fight [[Kid Norfolk]], whom Hollandersky had already met. Connors may have had weight on Hollandersky, and most certainly a five inch advantage in height and reach.