Fight:22489 - Revision history

Jcs at 01:23, 9 October 2013

2013-10-09T01:23:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:23, 9 October 2013
Line 6:		Line 6:
	== Comment(s): ==		== Comment(s): ==
	- Wilde was a 5-2 betting underdog. [http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F70813FF3D5C147A93CAA8178CD85F4D8185F9]<br>		- Wilde was a 5-2 betting underdog. [http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F70813FF3D5C147A93CAA8178CD85F4D8185F9]<br>
	- Fight was set at a weight of 116lb. [http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F70813FF3D5C147A93CAA8178CD85F4D8185F9].		- Fight was set at a weight of 116lb. [http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F70813FF3D5C147A93CAA8178CD85F4D8185F9]<br>
			- Purse was $25,000. [http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F70813FF3D5C147A93CAA8178CD85F4D8185F9]

Jcs at 01:21, 9 October 2013

2013-10-09T01:21:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:21, 9 October 2013
Line 5:		Line 5:
	<br clear=all>		<br clear=all>
	== Comment(s): ==		== Comment(s): ==
	- Wilde was a 5-2 betting underdog. Fight was set at a weight of 116lb. [http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F70813FF3D5C147A93CAA8178CD85F4D8185F9].		- Wilde was a 5-2 betting underdog. [http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F70813FF3D5C147A93CAA8178CD85F4D8185F9]<br>
			- Fight was set at a weight of 116lb. [http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F70813FF3D5C147A93CAA8178CD85F4D8185F9].

Jcs at 01:20, 9 October 2013

2013-10-09T01:20:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:20, 9 October 2013
Line 5:		Line 5:
	<br clear=all>		<br clear=all>
	== Comment(s): ==		== Comment(s): ==
	- Wilde was a 5-2 betting underdog [http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F70813FF3D5C147A93CAA8178CD85F4D8185F9].		- Wilde was a 5-2 betting underdog. Fight was set at a weight of 116lb. [http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F70813FF3D5C147A93CAA8178CD85F4D8185F9].

Jcs at 01:19, 9 October 2013

2013-10-09T01:19:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:19, 9 October 2013
Line 3:		Line 3:

	This was a great fight, filled to the brim with action. In general, Americans seem to have seen Moore as the winner and the British favored Wilde. According to the British, Moore did not "hit correctly," by which they meant that he tended to use the open glove, and this must have cost him points with the British referee. Wilde was in serious trouble in rounds 16 and 17 but came back with a fast finish.		This was a great fight, filled to the brim with action. In general, Americans seem to have seen Moore as the winner and the British favored Wilde. According to the British, Moore did not "hit correctly," by which they meant that he tended to use the open glove, and this must have cost him points with the British referee. Wilde was in serious trouble in rounds 16 and 17 but came back with a fast finish.
			<br clear=all>
			== Comment(s): ==
			- Wilde was a 5-2 betting underdog [http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F70813FF3D5C147A93CAA8178CD85F4D8185F9].

Ric: Created page with '400px 22489 This was a great fight, filled to the brim with action. In general, Americans seem to have seen Moore as the winn…'

2010-05-23T18:42:13Z

Created page with 'right|thumb|400px <fight>22489</fight> This was a great fight, filled to the brim with action. In general, Americans seem to have seen Moore as the winn…'

New page

[[File:WildeMoore.jpeg|right|thumb|400px]]
<fight>22489</fight>

This was a great fight, filled to the brim with action. In general, Americans seem to have seen Moore as the winner and the British favored Wilde. According to the British, Moore did not "hit correctly," by which they meant that he tended to use the open glove, and this must have cost him points with the British referee. Wilde was in serious trouble in rounds 16 and 17 but came back with a fast finish.