Fight:947961 - Revision history

Sid schneck at 13:30, 29 October 2014

2014-10-29T13:30:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:30, 29 October 2014
Line 4:		Line 4:


	This fight took place in New Bedford--it did not take place in Boston as previously shown. It was a split decision victory for Elkins per<i>Boston Post</i>. The <i>Lowell Sun</i> reported a decision win for Elkins. <i>Boston Globe later reported this as a New England Featherweight Title Fight</i>. Title confirmed in Sep 10, 1921 Illustrated boxing News -- Elkins would hold title only ten days. It is not clear why the Globe reported that Elkins had won by a knockout in five.		This fight took place in New Bedford--it did not take place in Boston as previously shown. It was a split decision victory for Elkins per the <i>Boston Post</i>. The <i>Lowell Sun</i> reported a decision win for Elkins. <i>Boston Globe later reported this as a New England Featherweight Title Fight</i>. Title confirmed in Sep 10, 1921 Illustrated boxing News -- Elkins would hold title only ten days. It is not clear why the Globe reported that Elkins had won by a knockout in five.

Sid schneck at 13:29, 29 October 2014

2014-10-29T13:29:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:29, 29 October 2014
Line 4:		Line 4:


	This fight took place in New Bedford--it did not take place in Boston as previously shown. It was a split decision victory for Elkins per<i>Boston Post</i>. The <i>Lowell Sun</i> reported a decision win for Elkins. <i>Boston Globe later reported this as a New England Featherweight Title Fight</i>. Title confirmed in Sep 10, 1921 Illustrated boxing News -- Elkins would hold title only ten days.		This fight took place in New Bedford--it did not take place in Boston as previously shown. It was a split decision victory for Elkins per<i>Boston Post</i>. The <i>Lowell Sun</i> reported a decision win for Elkins. <i>Boston Globe later reported this as a New England Featherweight Title Fight</i>. Title confirmed in Sep 10, 1921 Illustrated boxing News -- Elkins would hold title only ten days. It is not clear why the Globe reported that Elkins had won by a knockout in five.

Sid schneck at 13:28, 29 October 2014

2014-10-29T13:28:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:28, 29 October 2014
Line 4:		Line 4:


	This fight took place in New Bedford--it did not take place in Boston as previously shown. It was a ~~KO in five~~ for Elkins ~~and not a newspaper win~~ per ~~the~~ <i>Boston ~~Globe~~</i>. The <i>Lowell Sun</i> reported a decision win for Elkins. <i>Boston Globe later reported this as a New England Featherweight Title Fight</i>. Title confirmed in Sep 10, 1921 Illustrated boxing News -- Elkins would hold title only ten days.		This fight took place in New Bedford--it did not take place in Boston as previously shown. It was a split decision victory for Elkins per<i>Boston Post</i>. The <i>Lowell Sun</i> reported a decision win for Elkins. <i>Boston Globe later reported this as a New England Featherweight Title Fight</i>. Title confirmed in Sep 10, 1921 Illustrated boxing News -- Elkins would hold title only ten days.

Delisa: Created page with " This fight took place in New Bedford--it did not take place in Boston as previously shown. It was a KO in five for Elkins and not a newspaper win per the Boston Globe<..."

2012-06-11T01:28:37Z

Created page with " This fight took place in New Bedford--it did not take place in Boston as previously shown. It was a KO in five for Elkins and not a newspaper win per the Boston Globe<..."

New page

This fight took place in New Bedford--it did not take place in Boston as previously shown. It was a KO in five for Elkins and not a newspaper win per the Boston Globe. The Lowell Sun reported a decision win for Elkins. Boston Globe later reported this as a New England Featherweight Title Fight. Title confirmed in Sep 10, 1921 Illustrated boxing News -- Elkins would hold title only ten days.