https://boxrec.com/wiki/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3AFight%3A125422 2026-06-12T16:30:49Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.38.2 https://boxrec.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Fight:125422&diff=64070&oldid=prev 2006-03-31T06:18:20Z

<p></p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <col class="diff-marker" /> <col class="diff-content" /> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 06:18, 31 March 2006</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1">Line 1:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 1:</td></tr> <tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Matt: I am of the school that when it is discovered there is some incorrect information in a page, whose source is provided (such as a boxing magazine or newspaper), that bad info should be kept in the page, with a notation that it is in fact wrong. Provide the source that corrects the info, plus the correct info. As we have now both done here. This way, when some future visitor comes along, having read the 1999 &#039;&#039;Ring&#039;&#039; and wonders why there is conflicting info, they will have both sources. Cheers. --[[User:Ric|Ric]] 21:53, 30 Mar 2006 (CST)</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Matt: I am of the school that when it is discovered there is some incorrect information in a page, whose source is provided (such as a boxing magazine or newspaper), that bad info should be kept in the page, with a notation that it is in fact wrong. Provide the source that corrects the info, plus the correct info. As we have now both done here. This way, when some future visitor comes along, having read the 1999 &#039;&#039;Ring&#039;&#039; and wonders why there is conflicting info, they will have both sources. Cheers. --[[User:Ric|Ric]] 21:53, 30 Mar 2006 (CST)</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Can't you use the talk page for bad info? If it's a common enough problem, like Nikolay Valuev and his height and name spelling, it probably makes sense to mention it in the article. Yes, someone might see the error and try to correct, but then all you have to do is talk to them, and explain the situation. Or they can go to the talk page and read it.--[[User:Matt Tegen|Matt Tegen]] 00:18, 31 Mar 2006 (CST)</ins></div></td></tr> </table>

Matt https://boxrec.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Fight:125422&diff=26941&oldid=prev 2006-03-31T03:53:17Z

<p>Incorrect Info</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>Matt: I am of the school that when it is discovered there is some incorrect information in a page, whose source is provided (such as a boxing magazine or newspaper), that bad info should be kept in the page, with a notation that it is in fact wrong. Provide the source that corrects the info, plus the correct info. As we have now both done here. This way, when some future visitor comes along, having read the 1999 &#039;&#039;Ring&#039;&#039; and wonders why there is conflicting info, they will have both sources. Cheers. --[[User:Ric|Ric]] 21:53, 30 Mar 2006 (CST)</div>

Ric