Talk:Michael Watson - Revision history

Matt at 06:06, 19 February 2006

2006-02-19T06:06:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:06, 19 February 2006
Line 5:		Line 5:
	== Protected ==		== Protected ==
	Any proposed changes to the page should be discussed here. The page will remain locked, due to multiple reverts by GNicholas and his aliases.--[[User:Matt Tegen\|Matt Tegen]] 08:52, 4 Nov 2005 (CST)		Any proposed changes to the page should be discussed here. The page will remain locked, due to multiple reverts by GNicholas and his aliases.--[[User:Matt Tegen\|Matt Tegen]] 08:52, 4 Nov 2005 (CST)

			Article is unprotected, hoping for better results.--[[User:Matt Tegen\|Matt Tegen]] 00:06, 19 Feb 2006 (CST)

Matt at 14:52, 4 November 2005

2005-11-04T14:52:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:52, 4 November 2005
Line 4:		Line 4:

	== Protected ==		== Protected ==
	Any proposed changes to the page should be discussed here. The page will remain locked, due to multiple reverts by GNicholas and his aliases.		Any proposed changes to the page should be discussed here. The page will remain locked, due to multiple reverts by GNicholas and his aliases.--[[User:Matt Tegen\|Matt Tegen]] 08:52, 4 Nov 2005 (CST)

Matt at 14:52, 4 November 2005

2005-11-04T14:52:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:52, 4 November 2005
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Others have taken the time and care to proofread the article, and clean it up, yet User GNicholas has insisted on reverting the article to the original format with errors, and other issues. If you revert this again without discussing on this page, I propose putting you on a 7 day ban. --[[User:Matt Tegen\|Matt Tegen]] 10:40, 3 Nov 2005 (CST)		Others have taken the time and care to proofread the article, and clean it up, yet User GNicholas has insisted on reverting the article to the original format with errors, and other issues. If you revert this again without discussing on this page, I propose putting you on a 7 day ban. --[[User:Matt Tegen\|Matt Tegen]] 10:40, 3 Nov 2005 (CST)

			== Protected ==
			Any proposed changes to the page should be discussed here. The page will remain locked, due to multiple reverts by GNicholas and his aliases.

Matt at 16:40, 3 November 2005

2005-11-03T16:40:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:40, 3 November 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The reason I made my original edit, which Nicholas has overriden by reinstating the original text, is that "cut short" and "ending prematurely" is redundant. You should say one or the other, but not both. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 19:28, 2 Nov 2005 (CST)		The reason I made my original edit, which Nicholas has overriden by reinstating the original text, is that "cut short" and "ending prematurely" is redundant. You should say one or the other, but not both. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 19:28, 2 Nov 2005 (CST)

			Others have taken the time and care to proofread the article, and clean it up, yet User GNicholas has insisted on reverting the article to the original format with errors, and other issues. If you revert this again without discussing on this page, I propose putting you on a 7 day ban. --[[User:Matt Tegen\|Matt Tegen]] 10:40, 3 Nov 2005 (CST)

Ric: Redundancy

2005-11-03T01:28:46Z

Redundancy

New page

The reason I made my original edit, which Nicholas has overriden by reinstating the original text, is that "cut short" and "ending prematurely" is redundant. You should say one or the other, but not both. --[[User:Ric|Ric]] 19:28, 2 Nov 2005 (CST)