Talk:Young Firpo - Revision history

Matt at 17:19, 3 June 2006

2006-06-03T17:19:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:19, 3 June 2006
Line 10:		Line 10:

	And now 45 hits in less than three hours since I recreated this page this evening. How childish! Let's see what they are tomorrow at this time. We'll just keep deleting and recreating this page, so that the page view numbers truly reflect the page's popularilty (and not someone's attempts to continually artificially inflate them) if you wanna play this game. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 00:22, 24 Feb 2006 (CST)		And now 45 hits in less than three hours since I recreated this page this evening. How childish! Let's see what they are tomorrow at this time. We'll just keep deleting and recreating this page, so that the page view numbers truly reflect the page's popularilty (and not someone's attempts to continually artificially inflate them) if you wanna play this game. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 00:22, 24 Feb 2006 (CST)

			== Paragraph that is being deleted ==
			Stop reinserting the paragraph about how it is "neigh impossible" to describe the essence of Firpo in this forum. One could argue that about hundreds of other boxers, yet you do not see that on any other page. I understand Firpo has a place close to your heart as your father, but this is an encyclopedia, not a personal tribute page.--[[User:Matt Tegen\|Matt Tegen]] 12:19, 3 Jun 2006 (CDT)

Ric: /* Refresh Abuse: Quit It! */

2006-02-24T06:22:25Z

Refresh Abuse: Quit It!

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:22, 24 February 2006
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Whoever is being childish and artificially inflating the page views of this page, would you please quit it? There is no way this page got 1950 valid page views since yesterday. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 22:00, 23 Feb 2006 (CST)		Whoever is being childish and artificially inflating the page views of this page, would you please quit it? There is no way this page got 1950 valid page views since yesterday. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 22:00, 23 Feb 2006 (CST)

			And now 45 hits in less than three hours since I recreated this page this evening. How childish! Let's see what they are tomorrow at this time. We'll just keep deleting and recreating this page, so that the page view numbers truly reflect the page's popularilty (and not someone's attempts to continually artificially inflate them) if you wanna play this game. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 00:22, 24 Feb 2006 (CST)

Ric: Refresh Abuse: Quit It!

2006-02-24T04:00:08Z

Refresh Abuse: Quit It!

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:00, 24 February 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:

	I am suspecting "page view refresh" abuse here, whereby some one or more folks re-click on this page simply to make its ranking rise in the "Most Visited Pages" [http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Special:Popularpages&limit=250&offset=0 page]. While the pages of other, more well-known, boxers in the 100-300 most visited pages have been getting on average 50-70 page views per week, this one has gotten 240 in only one week, and seems to have been getting a similar number of clicks in the past few weeks. Continued refreshing abuse may result in it being deleted and re-created, as is the policy when page view numbers are being artificially inflated. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 12:03, 17 Feb 2006 (CST)		I am suspecting "page view refresh" abuse here, whereby some one or more folks re-click on this page simply to make its ranking rise in the "Most Visited Pages" [http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Special:Popularpages&limit=250&offset=0 page]. While the pages of other, more well-known, boxers in the 100-300 most visited pages have been getting on average 50-70 page views per week, this one has gotten 240 in only one week, and seems to have been getting a similar number of clicks in the past few weeks. Continued refreshing abuse may result in it being deleted and re-created, as is the policy when page view numbers are being artificially inflated. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 12:03, 17 Feb 2006 (CST)

			== Refresh Abuse: Quit It! ==

			Whoever is being childish and artificially inflating the page views of this page, would you please quit it? There is no way this page got 1950 valid page views since yesterday. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 22:00, 23 Feb 2006 (CST)

Ric: "Page View Refresh" Abuse

2006-02-17T18:03:25Z

"Page View Refresh" Abuse

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:03, 17 February 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Is Cotelli not related to Firpo, is that why you are deleting that?--[[User:Matt Tegen\|Matt Tegen]] 00:27, 25 Aug 2005 (CDT)		Is Cotelli not related to Firpo, is that why you are deleting that?--[[User:Matt Tegen\|Matt Tegen]] 00:27, 25 Aug 2005 (CDT)

			== "Page View Refresh" Abuse ==

			I am suspecting "page view refresh" abuse here, whereby some one or more folks re-click on this page simply to make its ranking rise in the "Most Visited Pages" [http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Special:Popularpages&limit=250&offset=0 page]. While the pages of other, more well-known, boxers in the 100-300 most visited pages have been getting on average 50-70 page views per week, this one has gotten 240 in only one week, and seems to have been getting a similar number of clicks in the past few weeks. Continued refreshing abuse may result in it being deleted and re-created, as is the policy when page view numbers are being artificially inflated. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 12:03, 17 Feb 2006 (CST)

Matt at 05:27, 25 August 2005

2005-08-25T05:27:53Z

New page

Is Cotelli not related to Firpo, is that why you are deleting that?--[[User:Matt Tegen|Matt Tegen]] 00:27, 25 Aug 2005 (CDT)