User talk:DRDATABOX - Revision history

John: /* Please stop */ new section

2009-12-09T14:25:12Z

Please stop: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:25, 9 December 2009
Line 13:		Line 13:

	Please look over your work and make sure you correct misspellings and other mistakes before saving. Or go back and fix things. Such as the word "infict" in the Juarez bout and lack of appropriate spaces. It would also be nice if you would respond to messages sent to you. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 22:37, 3 Jun 2006 (CDT)		Please look over your work and make sure you correct misspellings and other mistakes before saving. Or go back and fix things. Such as the word "infict" in the Juarez bout and lack of appropriate spaces. It would also be nice if you would respond to messages sent to you. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 22:37, 3 Jun 2006 (CDT)

			== Please stop ==

			Your Data Boxing comments are effectively gibberish to everyone apart from yourself, please do not put them in the wiki [[User:John\|JohnShep]] 14:25, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Ric: Proofread Your Work

2006-06-04T03:37:57Z

Proofread Your Work

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:37, 4 June 2006
Line 9:		Line 9:

	Please explain to me what you use to derive your information. Have you published the methods that you use to come up with your calculation, so that they can be critiqued by others? Until you communicate, your information is going to be removed. Right now, from all we know, it is original research and unverifiable.--[[User:Matt Tegen\|Matt Tegen]] 16:15, 31 May 2006 (CDT)		Please explain to me what you use to derive your information. Have you published the methods that you use to come up with your calculation, so that they can be critiqued by others? Until you communicate, your information is going to be removed. Right now, from all we know, it is original research and unverifiable.--[[User:Matt Tegen\|Matt Tegen]] 16:15, 31 May 2006 (CDT)

			== Proofread Your Work ==

			Please look over your work and make sure you correct misspellings and other mistakes before saving. Or go back and fix things. Such as the word "infict" in the Juarez bout and lack of appropriate spaces. It would also be nice if you would respond to messages sent to you. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 22:37, 3 Jun 2006 (CDT)

Matt at 21:15, 31 May 2006

2006-05-31T21:15:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:15, 31 May 2006
Line 7:		Line 7:

	If this is some calculation you came up with yourself, it doesn't belong here, since it would fall under original research.--[[User:Matt Tegen\|Matt Tegen]] 18:17, 30 May 2006 (CDT)		If this is some calculation you came up with yourself, it doesn't belong here, since it would fall under original research.--[[User:Matt Tegen\|Matt Tegen]] 18:17, 30 May 2006 (CDT)

			Please explain to me what you use to derive your information. Have you published the methods that you use to come up with your calculation, so that they can be critiqued by others? Until you communicate, your information is going to be removed. Right now, from all we know, it is original research and unverifiable.--[[User:Matt Tegen\|Matt Tegen]] 16:15, 31 May 2006 (CDT)

Matt at 23:17, 30 May 2006

2006-05-30T23:17:39Z

New page

On the page of the Barrera-Juarez fight, you write "DATA BOXING REPORTS 123 EPR(Events Per Round) with Barrera having a 51-49%edge.""

Questions:
*What is Data Boxing?
*What is Events per round?
*Were is your website?

If this is some calculation you came up with yourself, it doesn't belong here, since it would fall under original research.--[[User:Matt Tegen|Matt Tegen]] 18:17, 30 May 2006 (CDT)