User talk:Flatnose - Revision history

Juanblas at 08:04, 19 July 2019

2019-07-19T08:04:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:04, 19 July 2019
Line 4:		Line 4:

	It was a newspaper article. I don't recall which paper. I was searching for a good write-up on this fight - as I knew little about it - and came across this article using newspaperarchive.com. Wish I could be more help.		It was a newspaper article. I don't recall which paper. I was searching for a good write-up on this fight - as I knew little about it - and came across this article using newspaperarchive.com. Wish I could be more help.

			Many thanks.

Flatnose: /* Hello */

2019-07-19T02:08:48Z

Hello

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:08, 19 July 2019
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Of what page web or journal you see this [[Ken_Buchanan_vs._Miguel_Velasquez\|cite]]. Thank you.		Of what page web or journal you see this [[Ken_Buchanan_vs._Miguel_Velasquez\|cite]]. Thank you.

			It was a newspaper article. I don't recall which paper. I was searching for a good write-up on this fight - as I knew little about it - and came across this article using newspaperarchive.com. Wish I could be more help.

Juanblas: /* Hello */ new section

2019-07-18T22:16:58Z

Hello: new section

← Older revision	Revision as of 22:16, 18 July 2019
Line 1:	Line 1:
		== Hello ==

		Of what page web or journal you see this [[Ken_Buchanan_vs._Miguel_Velasquez\|cite]]. Thank you.

Flatnose: Blanked the page

2014-01-25T17:26:55Z

Blanked the page

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:26, 25 January 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~== Insert "Fight Code" ==~~

	~~When creating a fight page, remember to add the "fight code" at the very top of the page.~~
	~~The fight code is the fight number (which you can see at the top of any fight page) contained within "fight" code tags, like this: <nowiki><fight>12345</fight></nowiki><br>~~

	The fight code will automatically insert the names of the boxers, result, location, and date. You can then add other text and images. You can get other instructions and help [[Help:Contents\|here]]. Try entering the fight code in [[Fight:238768\|this page]] you just worked on. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 16:05, 22 June 2007 (CDT)

Flatnose: /* BOB BAKER INFO */

2014-01-25T17:26:20Z

BOB BAKER INFO

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:26, 25 January 2014
Line 5:		Line 5:

	The fight code will automatically insert the names of the boxers, result, location, and date. You can then add other text and images. You can get other instructions and help [[Help:Contents\|here]]. Try entering the fight code in [[Fight:238768\|this page]] you just worked on. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 16:05, 22 June 2007 (CDT)		The fight code will automatically insert the names of the boxers, result, location, and date. You can then add other text and images. You can get other instructions and help [[Help:Contents\|here]]. Try entering the fight code in [[Fight:238768\|this page]] you just worked on. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 16:05, 22 June 2007 (CDT)
	~~==BOB BAKER INFO==~~


	~~http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Bob_Baker where it says lost to colley wallace, it must say lost very close controversial decision.~~

	~~http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Tommy_Jackson_vs._Bob_Baker_%281st_meeting%29~~

	~~Archie Moore was returned to the rankings as light heavyweight champion by the NBA, however The Ring magazine still considered him the light heavyweight champion.~~

	~~This is wrong, it should say ring magazine still considered moore #1 heavyweight contender!~~

	~~Hey, Most, why are you sending this to me? Look at the history on the piece. I added in Cus D'Amato's quote, some stats and an AP card. Read everything first. -Flatnose~~

	~~: You did not change colley wallace fight to very close decision.~~

	in Baker-Hurricane fight you did not delete moore kept his title, instead it should say moore was considered still a challenger for rocky's title, check feb 1956 ratings. change it both asap!what you did has nothing to do with my concerns.

	~~If it's not changed, it will only mislead people as its doing thus taking away credibility of boxrec!~~

	~~reply on my page!~~
	~~: BOXREC HAS BAD REPUTATION WITH FACTS AND DETAILS!~~

Most: : BOXREC HAS BAD REPUTATION WITH FACTS AND DETAILS!

2013-10-06T22:00:28Z

: BOXREC HAS BAD REPUTATION WITH FACTS AND DETAILS!

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:00, 6 October 2013
Line 25:		Line 25:

	reply on my page!		reply on my page!
			: BOXREC HAS BAD REPUTATION WITH FACTS AND DETAILS!

Most: boxrec's credibility down

2013-09-12T02:31:28Z

boxrec's credibility down

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:31, 12 September 2013
Line 22:		Line 22:
	in Baker-Hurricane fight you did not delete moore kept his title, instead it should say moore was considered still a challenger for rocky's title, check feb 1956 ratings. change it both asap!what you did has nothing to do with my concerns.		in Baker-Hurricane fight you did not delete moore kept his title, instead it should say moore was considered still a challenger for rocky's title, check feb 1956 ratings. change it both asap!what you did has nothing to do with my concerns.

	If it's not changed, it will only mislead people!		If it's not changed, it will only mislead people as its doing thus taking away credibility of boxrec!

			reply on my page!

Most: misleading

2013-09-08T21:30:49Z

misleading

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:30, 8 September 2013
Line 21:		Line 21:

	in Baker-Hurricane fight you did not delete moore kept his title, instead it should say moore was considered still a challenger for rocky's title, check feb 1956 ratings. change it both asap!what you did has nothing to do with my concerns.		in Baker-Hurricane fight you did not delete moore kept his title, instead it should say moore was considered still a challenger for rocky's title, check feb 1956 ratings. change it both asap!what you did has nothing to do with my concerns.

			If it's not changed, it will only mislead people!

Most: fixing mistakes by bad editors

2013-09-08T21:30:15Z

fixing mistakes by bad editors

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:30, 8 September 2013
Line 17:		Line 17:

	Hey, Most, why are you sending this to me? Look at the history on the piece. I added in Cus D'Amato's quote, some stats and an AP card. Read everything first. -Flatnose		Hey, Most, why are you sending this to me? Look at the history on the piece. I added in Cus D'Amato's quote, some stats and an AP card. Read everything first. -Flatnose

			: You did not change colley wallace fight to very close decision.

			in Baker-Hurricane fight you did not delete moore kept his title, instead it should say moore was considered still a challenger for rocky's title, check feb 1956 ratings. change it both asap!what you did has nothing to do with my concerns.

Flatnose at 02:19, 27 August 2013

2013-08-27T02:19:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:19, 27 August 2013
Line 16:		Line 16:
	This is wrong, it should say ring magazine still considered moore #1 heavyweight contender!		This is wrong, it should say ring magazine still considered moore #1 heavyweight contender!

	Hey, Most, why are you sending this to me? Look at the history on the piece. I added in Cus D'Amato's quote, some stats and an AP card. Read everything first.		Hey, Most, why are you sending this to me? Look at the history on the piece. I added in Cus D'Amato's quote, some stats and an AP card. Read everything first. -Flatnose