User talk:Gnicholas75 - Revision history

Matt at 19:52, 11 February 2006

2006-02-11T19:52:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:52, 11 February 2006
Line 14:		Line 14:

	It must of been Thorneycraft. No, they are DEFINATELY KO Magazine end-of-year p4p polls. I have loads more, I'll add in every year from 1980 upto 1995 when I get the time, I have every year.		It must of been Thorneycraft. No, they are DEFINATELY KO Magazine end-of-year p4p polls. I have loads more, I'll add in every year from 1980 upto 1995 when I get the time, I have every year.

			== Herol Graham ==
			Your edits to the Herol Graham page are completely POV, and have no place in an encyclopedia. I am going to revert your edits, and lock the page. You have chosen to not discuss the complaints about your edits. The page will be locked until you can join the discussion.--[[User:Matt Tegen\|Matt Tegen]] 13:52, 11 Feb 2006 (CST)

Gnicholas75 at 00:49, 7 January 2006

2006-01-07T00:49:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:49, 7 January 2006
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Because of your interest in Benn and Eubank, I thought it might be a British mag. Anyway, if this is a totally different publication from KO Magazine, then was all the stuff you entered in the KO Mag section about [[KO Magazine End of Year Pound-for-Pound Polls]] put under the incorrect magazine? PS: Was it you or Thorneycraft who wanted the Carruthers photos deleted? Who posted them in the first place? --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 18:26, 6 Jan 2006 (CST)		Because of your interest in Benn and Eubank, I thought it might be a British mag. Anyway, if this is a totally different publication from KO Magazine, then was all the stuff you entered in the KO Mag section about [[KO Magazine End of Year Pound-for-Pound Polls]] put under the incorrect magazine? PS: Was it you or Thorneycraft who wanted the Carruthers photos deleted? Who posted them in the first place? --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 18:26, 6 Jan 2006 (CST)

			It must of been Thorneycraft. No, they are DEFINATELY KO Magazine end-of-year p4p polls. I have loads more, I'll add in every year from 1980 upto 1995 when I get the time, I have every year.

Ric: /* KO vs. Knockout Magazine */

2006-01-07T00:26:01Z

KO vs. Knockout Magazine

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:26, 7 January 2006
Line 11:		Line 11:
	== KO vs. Knockout Magazine ==		== KO vs. Knockout Magazine ==

	Because of your interest in Benn and Eubank, I thought it might be a British mag. Anyway, if this is a totally different publication from KO Magazine, then was all the stuff you entered in the KO Mag section about [[KO Magazine End of Year Pound-for-Pound Polls]] put under the incorrect magazine? --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 18:24, 6 Jan 2006 (CST)		Because of your interest in Benn and Eubank, I thought it might be a British mag. Anyway, if this is a totally different publication from KO Magazine, then was all the stuff you entered in the KO Mag section about [[KO Magazine End of Year Pound-for-Pound Polls]] put under the incorrect magazine? PS: Was it you or Thorneycraft who wanted the Carruthers photos deleted? Who posted them in the first place? --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 18:26, 6 Jan 2006 (CST)

Ric: KO vs. Knockout Magazine

2006-01-07T00:24:09Z

KO vs. Knockout Magazine

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:24, 7 January 2006
Line 8:		Line 8:

	I must of got muddled up, I thought Knockout Mag was KO Mag.		I must of got muddled up, I thought Knockout Mag was KO Mag.

			== KO vs. Knockout Magazine ==

			Because of your interest in Benn and Eubank, I thought it might be a British mag. Anyway, if this is a totally different publication from KO Magazine, then was all the stuff you entered in the KO Mag section about [[KO Magazine End of Year Pound-for-Pound Polls]] put under the incorrect magazine? --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 18:24, 6 Jan 2006 (CST)

Gnicholas75 at 23:48, 6 January 2006

2006-01-06T23:48:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:48, 6 January 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:

	You uploaded an image to the KO Magazine section. But your image (click [[KO Magazine: November 1993\|here]]) says the magazine is Knockout magazine, not KO. Are you sure that image belongs in the KO magazine section. Is your image from a British publication? --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 17:15, 6 Jan 2006 (CST)		You uploaded an image to the KO Magazine section. But your image (click [[KO Magazine: November 1993\|here]]) says the magazine is Knockout magazine, not KO. Are you sure that image belongs in the KO magazine section. Is your image from a British publication? --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 17:15, 6 Jan 2006 (CST)

			Knockout magazine is definately not a British publication, why would it be a British publication?? I'm pretty sure it's an American publication.

			I must of got muddled up, I thought Knockout Mag was KO Mag.

Ric: KO vs. Knockout Magazine?

2006-01-06T23:15:51Z

KO vs. Knockout Magazine?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:15, 6 January 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Would you please use the "Show Preview" button, when ediuting a page, instead of making all these countless little edits and saving each and every one? If you have any questions about this, please ask. And please respond to messages. Thank you. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 15:30, 30 Dec 2005 (CST)		Would you please use the "Show Preview" button, when ediuting a page, instead of making all these countless little edits and saving each and every one? If you have any questions about this, please ask. And please respond to messages. Thank you. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 15:30, 30 Dec 2005 (CST)

			== KO vs. Knockout Magazine? ==

			You uploaded an image to the KO Magazine section. But your image (click [[KO Magazine: November 1993\|here]]) says the magazine is Knockout magazine, not KO. Are you sure that image belongs in the KO magazine section. Is your image from a British publication? --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 17:15, 6 Jan 2006 (CST)

Ric at 21:30, 30 December 2005

2005-12-30T21:30:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:30, 30 December 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~Once again~~ you ~~are attempting to override edits made by the Administrators, much like you did on an earlier piece. We are trying to make these pages look as professional as possible. If you disagree with our edits,~~ please ~~start a discussion, rather than trying to revert to your previous text versions. I "banned" you for 48 hours~~ the ~~last time, because you were not responding. You attempted to log in under a different name apparently during the ban, but you~~ "~~got caught.~~" ~~Please reply to our messages. We would like you to continue to contribute~~, ~~but we cannot have you continue your present practice. I would hate to take away your privileges for~~ a ~~longer or permanent period. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 10:51~~, ~~3 Nov 2005 (CST)~~		Would you please use the "Show Preview" button, when ediuting a page, instead of making all these countless little edits and saving each and every one? If you have any questions about this, please ask. And please respond to messages. Thank you. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 15:30, 30 Dec 2005 (CST)

	~~== You Have Been Suspended Again ==~~

	~~You must have read my message~~ of ~~earlier today to you. Why do you keep changing the text back so many times after the Administrators'~~ edits? ~~Why do~~ you ~~not respond to messages? Your privileges~~ have ~~been suspended a second time. Let's hope that after~~ this ~~suspension is lifted~~, ~~we won't have to permanently ban you~~. ~~BTW: Because you have been suspended, you may not be able to edit this and reply~~ to messages ~~now~~. ~~You can post a message in the BoxRec.com Forum in the meantime~~. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 15:09, ~~3 Nov~~ 2005 (CST)

Ric: /* You Have Been Suspended Again */

2005-11-03T21:09:22Z

You Have Been Suspended Again

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:09, 3 November 2005
Line 3:		Line 3:
	== You Have Been Suspended Again ==		== You Have Been Suspended Again ==

	You must have read my message of earlier today to you. Why do you keep changing the text back so many times after the Administrators' edits? Why do you not respond to messages? Your privileges have been suspended a second time. Let's hope that after this suspension is lifted, we won't have to permanently ban you. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 15:06, 3 Nov 2005 (CST)		You must have read my message of earlier today to you. Why do you keep changing the text back so many times after the Administrators' edits? Why do you not respond to messages? Your privileges have been suspended a second time. Let's hope that after this suspension is lifted, we won't have to permanently ban you. BTW: Because you have been suspended, you may not be able to edit this and reply to messages now. You can post a message in the BoxRec.com Forum in the meantime. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 15:09, 3 Nov 2005 (CST)

Ric: You Have Been Suspended Again

2005-11-03T21:06:39Z

You Have Been Suspended Again

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:06, 3 November 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Once again you are attempting to override edits made by the Administrators, much like you did on an earlier piece. We are trying to make these pages look as professional as possible. If you disagree with our edits, please start a discussion, rather than trying to revert to your previous text versions. I "banned" you for 48 hours the last time, because you were not responding. You attempted to log in under a different name apparently during the ban, but you "got caught." Please reply to our messages. We would like you to continue to contribute, but we cannot have you continue your present practice. I would hate to take away your privileges for a longer or permanent period. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 10:51, 3 Nov 2005 (CST)		Once again you are attempting to override edits made by the Administrators, much like you did on an earlier piece. We are trying to make these pages look as professional as possible. If you disagree with our edits, please start a discussion, rather than trying to revert to your previous text versions. I "banned" you for 48 hours the last time, because you were not responding. You attempted to log in under a different name apparently during the ban, but you "got caught." Please reply to our messages. We would like you to continue to contribute, but we cannot have you continue your present practice. I would hate to take away your privileges for a longer or permanent period. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 10:51, 3 Nov 2005 (CST)

			== You Have Been Suspended Again ==

			You must have read my message of earlier today to you. Why do you keep changing the text back so many times after the Administrators' edits? Why do you not respond to messages? Your privileges have been suspended a second time. Let's hope that after this suspension is lifted, we won't have to permanently ban you. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 15:06, 3 Nov 2005 (CST)

Ric: Nicholas, Please Reply

2005-11-03T16:51:26Z

Nicholas, Please Reply

New page

Once again you are attempting to override edits made by the Administrators, much like you did on an earlier piece. We are trying to make these pages look as professional as possible. If you disagree with our edits, please start a discussion, rather than trying to revert to your previous text versions. I "banned" you for 48 hours the last time, because you were not responding. You attempted to log in under a different name apparently during the ban, but you "got caught." Please reply to our messages. We would like you to continue to contribute, but we cannot have you continue your present practice. I would hate to take away your privileges for a longer or permanent period. --[[User:Ric|Ric]] 10:51, 3 Nov 2005 (CST)