User talk:Rowdytimothy - Revision history

Ric: /* Your E-mail Address */ new section

2010-11-14T01:15:59Z

Your E-mail Address: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:15, 14 November 2010
Line 187:		Line 187:

	Wondered where you were and thought you were gone for good. Welcome back! --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 02:47, 15 December 2009 (UTC)		Wondered where you were and thought you were gone for good. Welcome back! --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 02:47, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

			== Your E-mail Address ==

			Please e-mail me at ric@boxrec.com. Someone is looking for the two articles on women's boxing that appeared in the Aug and Sept 1974 ''Boxing Illustrated''. Would you be able to scan those and e-mail them to me? --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 01:15, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Red: re: additional information

2010-01-22T16:06:55Z

re: additional information

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:06, 22 January 2010
Line 88:		Line 88:
	Hey, I just wanted to let you know that the sanctioning body pages and links to champions and title fights are great, exact idea I was thinking just executed better, haha. I was a little worried when you deleted it, but it's much better this way. Also, do you know what to do about all the fight pages updating the information from the fight listings page and pretty much duplicating what is already written? If you make any kind of minor edit at all it does this. It's great for new pages but crappy for the 1000's of already done ones. Is this feature staying? Thanks! [[User:Nwwebber\|Nwwebber]] 02:36, 26 February 2008 (CST)		Hey, I just wanted to let you know that the sanctioning body pages and links to champions and title fights are great, exact idea I was thinking just executed better, haha. I was a little worried when you deleted it, but it's much better this way. Also, do you know what to do about all the fight pages updating the information from the fight listings page and pretty much duplicating what is already written? If you make any kind of minor edit at all it does this. It's great for new pages but crappy for the 1000's of already done ones. Is this feature staying? Thanks! [[User:Nwwebber\|Nwwebber]] 02:36, 26 February 2008 (CST)

	~~== Red (Pete Podgorski) ==~~		Just so You know. The only codes added without additional information were those that I was waiting for a confirmation on. Red
	~~When Pete Podgorski (Red) adds pages with just the boxer code~~. ~~Please go ahead and delete it. Pete~~ for ~~some reason chooses to act like~~ a ~~troll, and simply creates pages that don't need to exist~~.

	~~--[[User:Matt Tegen\|Matt Tegen]] 17:27, 27 February 2008 (CST)~~

	== Please Create Individual Gallery Categories ==		== Please Create Individual Gallery Categories ==

Ric: /* Welcome Back! */ new section

2009-12-15T02:47:51Z

Welcome Back!: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:47, 15 December 2009
Line 186:		Line 186:

	Thank you for making the change Rowdy--[[User:Reenthelawman\|Reenthelawman]] 23:38, 2 June 2009 (UTC)		Thank you for making the change Rowdy--[[User:Reenthelawman\|Reenthelawman]] 23:38, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

			== Welcome Back! ==

			Wondered where you were and thought you were gone for good. Welcome back! --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 02:47, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Reenthelawman: /* Nigel Benn */

2009-06-02T23:38:52Z

Nigel Benn

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:38, 2 June 2009
Line 184:		Line 184:

	Thank you. --[[User:Reenthelawman\|Reenthelawman]] 22:16, 30 May 2009 (UTC)		Thank you. --[[User:Reenthelawman\|Reenthelawman]] 22:16, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

			Thank you for making the change Rowdy--[[User:Reenthelawman\|Reenthelawman]] 23:38, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Reenthelawman: adding Nigel Benn section

2009-05-30T22:16:37Z

adding Nigel Benn section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:16, 30 May 2009
Line 179:		Line 179:

	Hey, Rowdy. I like what you did to add the IBHOF logo to its inductees' pages. Have you considered also adding the [[:Image:WBHOF.Logo.Color.jpg\|WBHOF logo]] to its inductees' pages? I realize the IBHOF is the more famous/prominent of the two, probably because it has an actual building and promotes itself more, but the WBHOF is the elder of the two. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 02:56, 30 March 2009 (UTC)		Hey, Rowdy. I like what you did to add the IBHOF logo to its inductees' pages. Have you considered also adding the [[:Image:WBHOF.Logo.Color.jpg\|WBHOF logo]] to its inductees' pages? I realize the IBHOF is the more famous/prominent of the two, probably because it has an actual building and promotes itself more, but the WBHOF is the elder of the two. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 02:56, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

			==Nigel Benn==
			Dear Rowdy, I wanted to add the category "Commonwealth Boxing Council Middleweight Champions" to [[Nigel Benn]]'s page, but it is locked. Could I impose on you to do it?

			Thank you. --[[User:Reenthelawman\|Reenthelawman]] 22:16, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Ric: /* WBHOF */ new section

2009-03-30T02:56:51Z

WBHOF: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:56, 30 March 2009
Line 175:		Line 175:

	Simply wonderful and top-quality work you are doing on this project. Well done, and THANK YOU! --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 04:05, 28 March 2009 (UTC)		Simply wonderful and top-quality work you are doing on this project. Well done, and THANK YOU! --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 04:05, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

			== WBHOF ==

			Hey, Rowdy. I like what you did to add the IBHOF logo to its inductees' pages. Have you considered also adding the [[:Image:WBHOF.Logo.Color.jpg\|WBHOF logo]] to its inductees' pages? I realize the IBHOF is the more famous/prominent of the two, probably because it has an actual building and promotes itself more, but the WBHOF is the elder of the two. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 02:56, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Ric: /* Boxing Illustrated / Boxing Digest */ new section

2009-03-28T04:05:49Z

Boxing Illustrated / Boxing Digest: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:05, 28 March 2009
Line 171:		Line 171:

	When one performs a search of "Al Weil," not knowing the correct spelling, "Al Weill" does not come up in the search results. That's why I had a "re-direct," which you have since deleted. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 23:29, 24 March 2009 (UTC)		When one performs a search of "Al Weil," not knowing the correct spelling, "Al Weill" does not come up in the search results. That's why I had a "re-direct," which you have since deleted. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 23:29, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

			== Boxing Illustrated / Boxing Digest ==

			Simply wonderful and top-quality work you are doing on this project. Well done, and THANK YOU! --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 04:05, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Ric: /* 'Al Weil' */ new section

2009-03-24T23:29:58Z

'Al Weil': new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:29, 24 March 2009
Line 167:		Line 167:

	Just curious, for future reference, as to why you moved (Ricardo Lopez vs. Hideyuki Ohashi moved to Hideyuki Ohashi vs. Ricardo Lopez)? --[[User:Sweetscientist\|Sweetscientist]] 02:41, 24 March 2009 (UTC)		Just curious, for future reference, as to why you moved (Ricardo Lopez vs. Hideyuki Ohashi moved to Hideyuki Ohashi vs. Ricardo Lopez)? --[[User:Sweetscientist\|Sweetscientist]] 02:41, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

			== 'Al Weil' ==

			When one performs a search of "Al Weil," not knowing the correct spelling, "Al Weill" does not come up in the search results. That's why I had a "re-direct," which you have since deleted. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 23:29, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Sweetscientist at 02:41, 24 March 2009

2009-03-24T02:41:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:41, 24 March 2009
Line 163:		Line 163:

	In every weight category, you've inserted links to the other sanctionning bodies, but I was wondering whether the USBA should be included there. Its not a North American sanctionning body, as it only sanctions fights involving American boxers.--[[User:Reenthelawman\|Reenthelawman]] 01:13, 16 February 2009 (UTC)		In every weight category, you've inserted links to the other sanctionning bodies, but I was wondering whether the USBA should be included there. Its not a North American sanctionning body, as it only sanctions fights involving American boxers.--[[User:Reenthelawman\|Reenthelawman]] 01:13, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

			== Why the move? ==

			Just curious, for future reference, as to why you moved (Ricardo Lopez vs. Hideyuki Ohashi moved to Hideyuki Ohashi vs. Ricardo Lopez)? --[[User:Sweetscientist\|Sweetscientist]] 02:41, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Reenthelawman: adding section regarding the USBA

2009-02-16T01:13:11Z

adding section regarding the USBA

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:13, 16 February 2009
Line 158:		Line 158:

	That WIKI entry misses the importance of the AEF rules from the tournaments held 1918-1919, which set weight divisions and led to the Walker law. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 18:11, 9 February 2009 (UTC)		That WIKI entry misses the importance of the AEF rules from the tournaments held 1918-1919, which set weight divisions and led to the Walker law. --[[User:Ric\|Ric]] 18:11, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

			==Should we include the USBA?==
			Dear Rowdy, I see you've taken the time of formatting the North American tables I created (NABF, NABA, NABO) and thank you very much for that.

			In every weight category, you've inserted links to the other sanctionning bodies, but I was wondering whether the USBA should be included there. Its not a North American sanctionning body, as it only sanctions fights involving American boxers.--[[User:Reenthelawman\|Reenthelawman]] 01:13, 16 February 2009 (UTC)