This is my favorite era of the sport.
Carmen Basilio, Tony Zale, Kid Gavilin, Rocky Graziano, Ray Robinson, Archie Moore
Name some more.
Basilio is one of my favorites. Zale too. Theres so many great ones.
This fight Moore Durelle 1 is probably my most favorite fight of all time to re-watch.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F03ji1_sVUw
the 40's and 50's
Re: the 40's and 50's
The late 40s to the late 50s is my favourite era too.
-
The Second God
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 72
- Joined: 26 Jun 2011, 22:07
Re: the 40's and 50's
Crease wrote:The late 40s to the late 50s is my favourite era too.
Share some fights.
Re: the 40's and 50's
When I was a kid Zale was often in top 10 MW lists but these days he seems to get overlooked.
It was special era in boxing.
It was special era in boxing.
-
Goodnight, Irene
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 9463
- Joined: 24 Sep 2007, 04:43
Re: the 40's and 50's
Do you think Zale is a top-10 candidate in 2011? How do you see him stacking up with a prime Hopkins head-to-head?Ezzard wrote:When I was a kid Zale was often in top 10 MW lists but these days he seems to get overlooked.
It was special era in boxing.
Re: the 40's and 50's
He’s a candidate.
I wonder if Hopkins could have made 160 back in Zale’s day. And if he could how much would have been left on the scales. Hopkins was tall and muscular unlike Hearns and Monzon who were tall and wiry…
If they did meet at their best… Zale would throw more but Hopkins would take few punches full-on and would be accurate with his counters. Zale was one of the greatest body punchers and he’d have success there.
As Hopkins has got older it’s become more obvious to me how good he is at judging range and how accomplished he is with his footwork. He often throws as he comes into range. I haven’t seen enough footage of Zale to know how he would cope. I think both men would have to dig deep in this fight.
I wonder if Hopkins could have made 160 back in Zale’s day. And if he could how much would have been left on the scales. Hopkins was tall and muscular unlike Hearns and Monzon who were tall and wiry…
If they did meet at their best… Zale would throw more but Hopkins would take few punches full-on and would be accurate with his counters. Zale was one of the greatest body punchers and he’d have success there.
As Hopkins has got older it’s become more obvious to me how good he is at judging range and how accomplished he is with his footwork. He often throws as he comes into range. I haven’t seen enough footage of Zale to know how he would cope. I think both men would have to dig deep in this fight.
-
The Second God
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 72
- Joined: 26 Jun 2011, 22:07
Re: the 40's and 50's
I'd say Zale would be a good match-up with Hopkins, Leonard or Hagler. I admire him quite a bit too. His fights with Graziano were quite spectacular. Graziano was no where close the fighter Zale was, I consider him, Graziano, to be more like Rubin Carter with more fights. But Zale had skills, real skills and discipline in the ring. His experience from being in all out struggles is something a lot of fighters never have.
Re: the 40's and 50's
...ezzard charles...willie pep....ezzard charles.....sandy sadler.....ezzard charles...ike williams...