HomicideHenry wrote:bripez wrote:I didn't know the fury / Partridge thing.
What then is Tyson Furys real name - I am sure I read a while ago that "Tyson" was a nickname and not his proper name, if his surname isn't even Fury then who is he ?
Henry - you sound like the most gullible person I have ever heard of (all this man of honour, never hurt anybody innocent, had over 1,000 fights undefeated nonsense).
I certainly hope you don't get a knock on the door from somebody saying that the were driving past your house and they wanted to let you know out of the goodness of their heart that you may have a lose tile on your roof, and as luck would have it they just happen to have their ladder with them and they would be willing to take a look at it for you ......
I have had dealings with both good and bad men/women from the traveller/gypsy world, or those you would call a 'slink' who claims to be one or associates themselves with them and their ways, etc. Probably a prime example of a true huckster and conman, that I have ever met and had dealings with, was Bobby Gunn (real name Robert Logan Williamson) who in all reality is not of gypsy/traveller stock but will say that he is. The moment I began questioning things, or doing my own investigations on things, and started making my own opinions (at the time I tried to do a ratings system for BKB fighters on ATGRADIO) it turned ugly and started getting death threats on my home phone from persons associated with him and other "friends" and "relatives".
I can tell you, as far as the Gorman's and
Fury's are concerned, that they are far and away more honorable and straight forward and polite/respectful than alot of others out there in the culture. That doesn't mean there isn't some bad apples, or users. Take nephew of Bartley Gorman and son of Sam Gorman, Jerry. Nice enough of a guy, and runs an unlicensed boxing organisation. However, he's the type that if he felt someone else would benefit him more, he'd drop you like a bag of potatoes. Which is what he did to me, when I said I couldn't support a certain fighter overseas who was a well known weapons/drug trafficker, and he decided to side with that man because that person was (and still is) rather popular.
That being said, I guess you have to judge each and every man upon their merits and character. John
Fury, reminds me of a line in the film The River's Edge, where Kevin Bacon's character said: "I am a nice guy, just a different kind of nice guy." No, he's not as level headed as his brother. Nor is he as calm, collective, as his brother. Yes, he's brash and yes he's very blunt and can be intimidating. Peter has his hands full, in alot of ways, trying to maintain some sort of order. But then again, Peter will also say it "He's his own man, and whatever he says and does is on him." That statement he's made time and again, not just on his brother but on his own son and nephew, or towards anyone for that matter.
But do I think John
Fury is a bad man? No. Do I think he can be a bit much at times? Yes. Do I think he can do better to compose himself? Sure. But do I believe he is like countless others in the culture who have done bad, and even went out of their way to kill someone? No. From what I understand of the incident (the eye gauging)
Fury said some things, the other man did too, and two other men jumped in and
Fury went batshit. Whether that's true or not, I don't know. As for his personal life, being violent with women, I think it goes more along these lines.... when someone is considered "the man" in that culture, its likened to being a celebrity, all the women come out of the woodwork and do whatever to be with whoever, and when their purpose is done, they are left behind and if they resist, then it gets ugly. I think John
Fury loved his wife, but because he was "the man" in the culture.... there were alot of temptations. Not making excuses, because I think any man who would step out on his family even once, cant have the best of morals or ethics and must be incredibly selfish and impulsive, however there is the way of the world to consider. How many "upstanding" athletes, citizens, etc. do we all know or know of who have done the same?
I guess my point is there is varying degrees of goodness and badness. And as far as John
Fury is concerned, he's not a good man, nor is he a bad one. And in his culture, he's considered something of a good man. Why? Because he's alot more reserved and respectful than alot of them out there. He'll intimidate you, he'll warn you, he may even hit you across the mouth to get the point across.... but he's not as bad as alot of them are... the most dangerous, I will assure you are those who will make the entire world believe they are on the level, but when push comes to shove, they will bury your ass without a second thought. For my money, I'd rather get the hell knocked out of me by a John
Fury than I would to unintentionally make some man mad in person or on the internet and get threatened, have your family threatened, or outright get jumped and possibly killed. Think Henry Wharton and what happened to him. Think of the traveller who represented Ireland in the Olympics who got stabbed and almost died because he wouldn't do a bare knuckle fight with some idiot. Hell, even think of the persons who stole Bartley Gorman's caravan, and set fire to Tyson
Fury's home. I can garuntee you, it was a traveller/gypsy family that did it.