Hatton Rumours

scurlaruntings · Post by **scurlaruntings** » 13 Dec 2007, 12:42

Why is all this libel crap coming back? This guy is a drone.He systematically goes from one forum to the next and destroys everything he touches.He did the same with Seconds Out ESB and now it seems Boxrec.If i were you guys id find somewhere else to post.

stujones · Post by **stujones** » 13 Dec 2007, 12:46

oliverfennell wrote:
Spud wrote:If you were right - there is thread after thread that could be pulled to bits how you lot - have gone off track and completely ruined reasoned boxing debate.

You and others go and f*ck yourself if you think I am going anywhere - until of course I am banned.

Its f*cking amazing how you w*nkers cling together agreeing with each other craving for acceptance and slagging Spud - crack on its all rather amusing.
Ah, I see clearly now! Everybody else is wrong and you are right.

Untill he is banned, or changes his account details - what this the fourth or the fifth different usernames... Isn't multiple usernames a bannable offense - maybe Mr Shep should decide that one.

Gum Sheild, Pepsi, Spud, Albert - probably others I have forgotton over the years.

rhino222 · Post by **rhino222** » 13 Dec 2007, 15:34

back to the king issue...the accusations are amazing... and i guess 'no smoke without fire' springs to mind.....

good job you did not go to thailand with him spud eh !!!!

Sammy Mendelson · Post by **Sammy Mendelson** » 13 Dec 2007, 15:47

rhino222 wrote:back to the king issue...the accusations are amazing... and i guess 'no smoke without fire' springs to mind.....

good job you did not go to thailand with him spud eh !!!!

I wonder if medical examinations would reveal traces of King's semen in, or around, Spud's person. I suspect if it was Don King, rather than Paul King, and there was a job on offer, you'd need the swabs from the Queen Mary to mop up the spunk!

nickd · Post by **nickd** » 13 Dec 2007, 15:56

Sammy Mendelson wrote:
rhino222 wrote:back to the king issue...the accusations are amazing... and i guess 'no smoke without fire' springs to mind.....

good job you did not go to thailand with him spud eh !!!!
I wonder if medical examinations would reveal traces of King's semen in, or around, Spud's person. I suspect if it was Don King, rather than Paul King, and there was a job on offer, you'd need the swabs from the Queen Mary to mop up the spunk!

Collins2000 · Post by **Collins2000** » 13 Dec 2007, 16:00

Wages clerk, spud? Surely they jest?

silkov · Post by **silkov** » 13 Dec 2007, 16:26

Ben Carey wrote:
silkov wrote:
Spud wrote: All I have done is ask questions. Not accused.

It seems all too convenient for everyone to sweep things under the carpet.
The truth is we dont care what youre doing!... yawn!... 8)
But by virtue of replying to him, you are. Why don't some of you 5,000+ posts pricks get that? If you can't stand Spud, don't respond to his posts, don't encourage him to come back at you, and on, and on, and on again.

One thing I don't get is that why people are rounding on Spud on this particular matter. He's been flagging the Hatton ticket fiasco for weeks (however small some of you regard it) and his points have always been valid in this instance.

It didn't need Boxing Chat to acknowledge this and then suddenly be appauded for it when he thinks the majority of you are tossers anyway. Time to put some of your many thousand posts to good use, Silkov. Go on, have a go.

I see your still spuds little page boy, ...havent you got anything better to do??....

...... as for my posts I'm flattered that it matters so much to you how often I post here

, ...keep reading them and you might learn something mate!

8)

silkov · Post by **silkov** » 13 Dec 2007, 16:29

stujones wrote:
oliverfennell wrote:
Spud wrote:If you were right - there is thread after thread that could be pulled to bits how you lot - have gone off track and completely ruined reasoned boxing debate.

You and others go and f*ck yourself if you think I am going anywhere - until of course I am banned.

Its f*cking amazing how you w*nkers cling together agreeing with each other craving for acceptance and slagging Spud - crack on its all rather amusing.
Ah, I see clearly now! Everybody else is wrong and you are right.
Untill he is banned, or changes his account details - what this the fourth or the fifth different usernames... Isn't multiple usernames a bannable offense - maybe Mr Shep should decide that one.

Gum Sheild, Pepsi, Spud, Albert - probably others I have forgotton over the years.

I love his 'pepsie' act... I suppose Ben Carey is Shirley!!!.... 8)

:P

silkov · Post by **silkov** » 13 Dec 2007, 16:31

Lets not ban spud, he's worth his weight in comedy!... I havent laughed so much in quite a while.... 8)

beagleboy · Post by **beagleboy** » 14 Dec 2007, 07:02

Sammy Mendelson wrote:
rhino222 wrote:back to the king issue...the accusations are amazing... and i guess 'no smoke without fire' springs to mind.....

good job you did not go to thailand with him spud eh !!!!
I wonder if medical examinations would reveal traces of King's semen in, or around, Spud's person. I suspect if it was Don King, rather than Paul King, and there was a job on offer, you'd need the swabs from the Queen Mary to mop up the spunk!

It's alleged that some semen was found inside Spud's parted starfish

Lightsoot · Post by **Lightsoot** » 14 Dec 2007, 07:24

silkov wrote:
Ben Carey wrote:
silkov wrote: The truth is we dont care what youre doing!... yawn!... 8)
But by virtue of replying to him, you are. Why don't some of you 5,000+ posts pricks get that? If you can't stand Spud, don't respond to his posts, don't encourage him to come back at you, and on, and on, and on again.

One thing I don't get is that why people are rounding on Spud on this particular matter. He's been flagging the Hatton ticket fiasco for weeks (however small some of you regard it) and his points have always been valid in this instance.

It didn't need Boxing Chat to acknowledge this and then suddenly be appauded for it when he thinks the majority of you are tossers anyway. Time to put some of your many thousand posts to good use, Silkov. Go on, have a go.
I see your still spuds little page boy, ...havent you got anything better to do??.... ...... as for my posts I'm flattered that it matters so much to you how often I post here , ...keep reading them and you might learn something mate! 8)

Haven't I got anything better to do? Coming from the bloke with 8,000+ posts, mostly about pure drivel? You need to get a shag mate. Alternatively try wanking over your keyboard, hopefully the clean up job will restrict you from posting. Your knowledge is woeful.

I'm not Spud's page boy, he knows I think he's a tosser, but I'll stick up for him when necessary. I'm tired of all the predictable Spud bashing. YOU and the rest of the happy clapper brigade are just as responsible for bringing the tone of the forum down but are blind to it (maybe you do wank?).

Your views aren't worth a toss, I don't care how many thousand posts youve made on here. No one respects your views.

Sammy Mendelson · Post by **Sammy Mendelson** » 14 Dec 2007, 07:48

Ben Carey wrote:Haven't I got anything better to do? Coming from the bloke with 8,000+ posts, mostly about pure drivel? You need to get a shag mate. Alternatively try wanking over your keyboard, hopefully the clean up job will restrict you from posting. Your knowledge is woeful.

I'm not Spud's page boy, he knows I think he's a tosser, but I'll stick up for him when necessary. I'm tired of all the predictable Spud bashing. YOU and the rest of the happy clapper brigade are just as responsible for bringing the tone of the forum down but are blind to it (maybe you do wank?).

Your views aren't worth a toss, I don't care how many thousand posts youve made on here. No one respects your views.

You need to chill out, pal! You seem very bitter. If you can't put a reasoned argument together, it is better to write nothing at all. You accuse "silkov" of writing drivel; read back over your post for a definition.

J · Post by J » 14 Dec 2007, 07:50

jesus feckin h christ.

perfect example of why boxing has imploded in this country.

too many folk massaging ego's and ginding axes, this is why we never get the best domestic match ups, can you not see this attitude that permeates boxing is holding it back in this country?

get a life.

J · Post by J » 14 Dec 2007, 07:57

you cant just blame spud though he is as culpable as any, takes more than person to tango.

Sammy Mendelson · Post by **Sammy Mendelson** » 14 Dec 2007, 08:09

J wrote:jesus feckin h christ.

perfect example of why boxing has imploded in this country.

too many folk massaging ego's and ginding axes, this is why we never get the best domestic match ups, can you not see this attitude that permeates boxing is holding it back in this country?

get a life.

J, if you think Woollatt and Carey, the King and Queen of the Anoraks, carry enough clout to prevent domestic match-ups of any standard from happening, you are sorely mistaken.

dondada · Post by **dondada** » 14 Dec 2007, 08:14

Mods, lock this shite up, FFS.

Sammy Mendelson · Post by **Sammy Mendelson** » 14 Dec 2007, 08:17

Ian 'Mr' McNeilly wrote:Mods, lock this shite up, FFS.

I disapprove of what you say but will defend to the death your right to say it.

Lightsoot · Post by **Lightsoot** » 14 Dec 2007, 08:18

I'm not bitter, just find many of you pricks very sad. Deliberately coming onto the forum to slag Spud off and then thinking that I give a toss for putting you straight? Give over. I sacked forums off a long time ago.

I'm currently at work, bored and counting down to 5pm. What you sad cases haven't grasped is that I provoke such responses from you to entertain me. You're doing a great job - cheers!

I used to love posting on forums - SecondsOut, Eastside, Doghouse - the majority of you followed us to the lot, in droves, too. We had the whole of British boxing checking us out.

Sure, we dropped a few bollocks along the way but without us two arseholes your working week was devoid of any stimulation. Me and Spud should be knighted. Seemingly many of you can't live without us.

Talk about a love-hate relationship. How flattering.

jamesmcdonnell · Post by **jamesmcdonnell** » 14 Dec 2007, 08:20

Ben, I've no axe to grind with you, you know that, but that statement makes you sound like an egomaniacal pillock frankly.

Let it lie, you're only going to make yourself look bad with those kinds of statements.

Sammy Mendelson · Post by **Sammy Mendelson** » 14 Dec 2007, 08:26

Ben Carey wrote:I sacked forums off a long time ago.

Looks like it.

Ben Carey wrote:What you sad cases haven't grasped is that I provoke such responses from you to entertain me.

Likewise

Ben Carey wrote:We had the whole of British boxing checking us out.

Course you did.

Ben Carey wrote:without us two arseholes

Fair description.

Ben Carey wrote:Me and Spud should be knighted.

"Spud and I". English never was your strong point.

Lightsoot · Post by **Lightsoot** » 14 Dec 2007, 08:37

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Ben, I've no axe to grind with you, you know that, but that statement makes you sound like an egomaniacal pillock frankly.

Let it lie, you're only going to make yourself look bad with those kinds of statements.

I’ve always got time for your comments, James. Appreciated. I know what you’re saying but some of them just need putting straight from time to time. Anyone who has met me from this forum, and in fairness there have been a few, know what I’m about and would acknowledge that the abuse from a bitter minority is off the mark.

I agree with Ian. The mods should lock this thread up. I’ve got a lot to contribute to forums like this but don’t attempt to piss me off by coming out with the same old mundane comments otherwise I’ll go elsewhere. Boxrec’s loss, to be frank.

Lightsoot · Post by **Lightsoot** » 14 Dec 2007, 08:40

Sammy Mendelson wrote:
Ben Carey wrote:I sacked forums off a long time ago.
Looks like it.

Ben Carey wrote:What you sad cases haven't grasped is that I provoke such responses from you to entertain me.
Likewise

Ben Carey wrote:We had the whole of British boxing checking us out.
Course you did.

Ben Carey wrote:without us two arseholes
Fair description.

Ben Carey wrote:Me and Spud should be knighted.
"Spud and I". English never was your strong point.

At least I'm prepared to say who I am and acknowledge my failings unlike you Sammy. Spineless prick. You've made 60 odd posts, 10+ about me and Spud. Sad.

Lenny · Post by **Lenny** » 14 Dec 2007, 08:42

Jeez that tops it all I reckon

steady on now chaps or we'll miss out on Carey's wealth of knowledge and i'm not sure I could live with myself if that was to happen

Sammy Mendelson · Post by **Sammy Mendelson** » 14 Dec 2007, 08:49

Lenny wrote:Jeez that tops it all I reckon

steady on now chaps or we'll miss out on Carey's wealth of knowledge and i'm not sure I could live with myself if that was to happen

Steady on or he'll get his missus on the keyboard to give you a ticking off. Wouldn't be the first time.

DavidPayne · Post by **DavidPayne** » 14 Dec 2007, 08:50

Stop it please. I nearly wet myself laughing then and I have no spare keks.

Ben, lad, if your tongue got any further in your cheek you start to sound like Jamie Oliver. Pack it in you sarky twat.

By the way, my dad's bigger than yours, and he used to be a wrestler.