It was english commentary and in black and white.Broncano wrote:So being that you just ran to the database to find the one oriental guy who lasted the longer against Duran, quick crash course: Ishimatsu Suzuki is how he was generally known around these parts. the "Guts Ishimatsu" is from Japan and that's how it was entered by our Japanese editor. Now you know he wasn't korean, and furthermore he was not a "no-name" as you candidly put it. You'll find out that there's more film for him available out there. And no, I don't mean youtube.Dentsun4228 wrote:Looking at the guy, I had thought he was Korean. It was Ishimatsu. He's Japanese.
Now let me ask you, this particular film where he's allegedly beating Duran to a pulp, what broadcast was it? English commentary? Spanish? B&W? color?
5 Floyd fantasy fights
-
Dentsun4228
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 61
- Joined: 15 Sep 2006, 15:26
Just what I thought. Another youtube film archivist here.Dentsun4228 wrote:It was english commentary and in black and white.Broncano wrote:So being that you just ran to the database to find the one oriental guy who lasted the longer against Duran, quick crash course: Ishimatsu Suzuki is how he was generally known around these parts. the "Guts Ishimatsu" is from Japan and that's how it was entered by our Japanese editor. Now you know he wasn't korean, and furthermore he was not a "no-name" as you candidly put it. You'll find out that there's more film for him available out there. And no, I don't mean youtube.Dentsun4228 wrote:Looking at the guy, I had thought he was Korean. It was Ishimatsu. He's Japanese.
Now let me ask you, this particular film where he's allegedly beating Duran to a pulp, what broadcast was it? English commentary? Spanish? B&W? color?
-
WorldGreatest
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4
- Joined: 31 Dec 2007, 12:32
Re: 5 Floyd fantasy fights
It is always a mammoth task to compare eras and the problem is compounded by multi division champs. There are lots of parameters going into the fight, like mental fitness, physical fitness, peak, etc. If you want to compare Floyd with Robinson, then you have to compare Floyd's success at welterweight against Robinson's Light Heavyweight. The same with SRL. Comparisons with Duran, Benny Leonard and Armstrong are fair but I think it is unfair to compare th 21st century athlete with Benny Leonard and to small degree Armstrong. As with Duran, I think is is close to call and it depends which Duran showed up that particular night. We know which Mayweather would turn up.Dentsun4228 wrote:I read with great indignation the thread about PBF-Duran. How anybody in their right mind could put Duran above floyd is beyond me. In case anybody has any questions about where I stand regarding PBF/Money, here's how I think he'd fare against some of the top Lighwts and welters of all time.
Duran-Mayweather. Look, duran lost to a guy named Esteban Dejesus when Duran was this supposedly invincible lightwt champ. Dejesus was no great...he was a good fighter with lateral movement and a decent punch and that's all he needed to drop Duran in the first round and outclass him for 12. In the rematch, Dejesus again dropped Duran in the first round and outboxed him until Duran's pressure got to him (Dejesus also had a serious drug problem even back then). Leonard outboxed duran with ease in fights 2 and 3. I don't think Floyd would try and get into a slugging match with Duran anymore than Cotto will stand and trade with Margarito. It's not his style. Bottomline is, when it's a matchup of styles, at lightwt, Duran would be vulnerable to Floyd's speed, movement and counterpunching. Even Leonard wasn't as versatile as Floyd. In a 12 round fight with both fighters at their best, Floyd wins by late KO over the wild, aggressive Duran.
Mayweather-Armstrong. Hammerin' Hank was a great fighter, no doubt. He was perpetual motion and a phenomenon for his era winning titles from feather to welter. He had 18 welterwt defenses. Still, PBF beats hank. It wouldn't be easy, but he'd give hank movement and slip through his own right crosses and left hooks that would keep Hank off-balance. It would be a great fight. But Floyd simply has more snap in his punches. Floyd can drop a guy with one punch. Hank rarely ever did that, relying on constant pressure and the accumulation of punches. Besides, Floyd being faster on his feet would keep Hank on the end of his punches and avoid the infighting that was Armstrongs forte.
Sugar Ray Leonard-Mayweather. The key here is that Leonard was a natural welter while Floyd is still a small welter. Leonard's strength would carry him to win over Floyd, but then again...Leonard had real probs with Benitez, a guy not half as talented as PBF. Leonard didn't fight a lot of fast, technical guys. It would be a thinking man's fight, but speed would carry the day. I see Leonard winning by the narrowest of margins in a fast-paced, exciting fight.
Mayweather-Benny Leonard- OK, so PBF/money would probably take this Leonard out in the first 30 seconds of the fight. It would be a complete mismatch. A guy from the 20's and 30's against a modern fighter. Before Leonard even knew what hit him he'd be out cold.
Robinson- Mayweather. I have PBF winning this at welter. Robinson was a great fighter and far ahead of his time, but he had problems with guys like Kid Gavilan and Johnny Bratton. Kid Gavilan was a great fighter, but not in Floyd's class. Robinson at welter was very fast and very strong, so the early rounds would be difficult for floyd...but down the stretch floyd gets stronger and more comfortable and can improvise. He'd match Robinson's speed and quickness but he'd be better in the inside which was not Robinson's strong point. Also, floyd's use of the ring and superior footwork would keep him always a step ahead over 12 rounds.
-
Dentsun4228
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 61
- Joined: 15 Sep 2006, 15:26
No, dude. I didn't see that particular duran fight on you tube. I saw it on tape. But I have seen some of RJJ and Shane mosely's and SRR early fights on youtube. It's not a bad resource for guys who are really into boxing and interested in seeing rare fights by the greats. This is why I know that SRL was not a hype job. That and what I've seen of him TV and on tape. He was a truly great fighter...fast, lethal. I've seen so much of Robinson over the years that I can say Floyd simply has more tools that he did. Robinson was a genius, but floyd is a brilliant fighter from a far more advanced era.Broncano wrote:Just what I thought. Another youtube film archivist here.Dentsun4228 wrote:It was english commentary and in black and white.Broncano wrote: So being that you just ran to the database to find the one oriental guy who lasted the longer against Duran, quick crash course: Ishimatsu Suzuki is how he was generally known around these parts. the "Guts Ishimatsu" is from Japan and that's how it was entered by our Japanese editor. Now you know he wasn't korean, and furthermore he was not a "no-name" as you candidly put it. You'll find out that there's more film for him available out there. And no, I don't mean youtube.
Now let me ask you, this particular film where he's allegedly beating Duran to a pulp, what broadcast was it? English commentary? Spanish? B&W? color?
-
Borinken25
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 721
- Joined: 08 Jul 2005, 12:28
Re: 5 Floyd fantasy fights
lol where do you come from, this post gave me good laugh, floyd is very talented but he doesnt beat these guys, benitez was probably one of the most talented guys to ever step in the ring you dont win a world title at 17 represented his country in open class at 14 turned pro at 15 yet pbf was more talented? and not be one of the most talented fighters ever(what happened to benitez where did he go wrong) leonard is to big, duran to good, robinson to big and good to powerful, halfley agree with your 20's/30's style thing but floys would not take benny leonard out quickly he may be able to out box him using technics that were not around in leonards timeDentsun4228 wrote:Where do people like you come from?...lol. A robbery? Obviously you didn't see the fight. Duran was beaten very convincingly...lost practically every round. Just check out a tape if you can find one somewhere. Dejesus dominated him in that fight. It demonstrated that you don't have to be a virtuoso boxer like Floyd to give Duran fits. Look how long Ray Lampkin lasted... and Lampkin was no more than a clubfighter. Duran was indeed a great fighter, but he didn't dominate every minute of every round against every guy he faced...and in many cases, some of them got the better of him even at lightwt where he was his best. If you stop listening to what people say and actually watch a few of his fights you'll see that he had very notable flaws that PBF would have easly exploited.Emerson Poncey Name Ghent wrote:Let's not get ahead of ourselves here.Dentsun4228 wrote:I read with great indignation the thread about PBF-Duran. How anybody in their right mind could put Duran above floyd is beyond me. In case anybody has any questions about where I stand regarding PBF/Money, here's how I think he'd fare against some of the top Lighwts and welters of all time.
Duran-Mayweather. Look, duran lost to a guy named Esteban Dejesus when Duran was this supposedly invincible lightwt champ. Dejesus was no great...he was a good fighter with lateral movement and a decent punch and that's all he needed to drop Duran in the first round and outclass him for 12. In the rematch, Dejesus again dropped Duran in the first round and outboxed him until Duran's pressure got to him (Dejesus also had a serious drug problem even back then). Leonard outboxed duran with ease in fights 2 and 3. I don't think Floyd would try and get into a slugging match with Duran anymore than Cotto will stand and trade with Margarito. It's not his style. Bottomline is, when it's a matchup of styles, at lightwt, Duran would be vulnerable to Floyd's speed, movement and counterpunching. Even Leonard wasn't as versatile as Floyd. In a 12 round fight with both fighters at their best, Floyd wins by late KO over the wild, aggressive Duran.
Mayweather-Armstrong. Hammerin' Hank was a great fighter, no doubt. He was perpetual motion and a phenomenon for his era winning titles from feather to welter. He had 18 welterwt defenses. Still, PBF beats hank. It wouldn't be easy, but he'd give hank movement and slip through his own right crosses and left hooks that would keep Hank off-balance. It would be a great fight. But Floyd simply has more snap in his punches. Floyd can drop a guy with one punch. Hank rarely ever did that, relying on constant pressure and the accumulation of punches. Besides, Floyd being faster on his feet would keep Hank on the end of his punches and avoid the infighting that was Armstrongs forte.
Sugar Ray Leonard-Mayweather. The key here is that Leonard was a natural welter while Floyd is still a small welter. Leonard's strength would carry him to win over Floyd, but then again...Leonard had real probs with Benitez, a guy not half as talented as PBF. Leonard didn't fight a lot of fast, technical guys. It would be a thinking man's fight, but speed would carry the day. I see Leonard winning by the narrowest of margins in a fast-paced, exciting fight.
Mayweather-Benny Leonard- OK, so PBF/money would probably take this Leonard out in the first 30 seconds of the fight. It would be a complete mismatch. A guy from the 20's and 30's against a modern fighter. Before Leonard even knew what hit him he'd be out cold.
Robinson- Mayweather. I have PBF winning this at welter. Robinson was a great fighter and far ahead of his time, but he had problems with guys like Kid Gavilan and Johnny Bratton. Kid Gavilan was a great fighter, but not in Floyd's class. Robinson at welter was very fast and very strong, so the early rounds would be difficult for floyd...but down the stretch floyd gets stronger and more comfortable and can improvise. He'd match Robinson's speed and quickness but he'd be better in the inside which was not Robinson's strong point. Also, floyd's use of the ring and superior footwork would keep him always a step ahead over 12 rounds.
The Dejesus points win, which I have, was a robbery against Duran, which he avenged years later. Duran has fought better speed (Leonard) and won.
Most journalists who were able to see Duran in his prime have said he's the best lightweight there has ever been. I don't think they're worlds apart, but Duran was also noted for his speed, head movement and angles, not just his power.
Also, Leonard and Hagler both gone on record to say that Duran was the best defensive fighter they have ever seen/fought.
To compare Mayweather to Robinson is even worse. Robinson was the greatest fighter there has ever been. Fact. Ask any boxer. After all, they now best.
As for Robinson, while I respect his great legacy, I have to call 'em as I see 'em. Robinson was indeed the greatest pfp boxer anybody had seen up until 1947. Since then boxing has changed and developed a little. The fact that about 15 years ago I might have agreed that robinson was the best ever says a lot. Guys like PBF and RJJ surpass robinson in a number of areas. Like I said, just watch the fights. I know sometimes watching the fights tend to bust a person's bubble, because reality can be a lot less comfortable than fantasy and seeing that these oldtimers had a lot of flaws and sometimes were terrible fighters is not what many fans want to believe. Fact is floyd is phenomenal talent. Far greater than duran and yes, I'd have to argue, better even than robinson.
Re: 5 Floyd fantasy fights
Dentsun4228 wrote:I read with great indignation the thread about PBF-Duran. How anybody in their right mind could put Duran above floyd is beyond me. In case anybody has any questions about where I stand regarding PBF/Money, here's how I think he'd fare against some of the top Lighwts and welters of all time.
Duran-Mayweather. Look, duran lost to a guy named Esteban Dejesus when Duran was this supposedly invincible lightwt champ. Dejesus was no great...he was a good fighter with lateral movement and a decent punch and that's all he needed to drop Duran in the first round and outclass him for 12. In the rematch, Dejesus again dropped Duran in the first round and outboxed him until Duran's pressure got to him (Dejesus also had a serious drug problem even back then). Leonard outboxed duran with ease in fights 2 and 3. I don't think Floyd would try and get into a slugging match with Duran anymore than Cotto will stand and trade with Margarito. It's not his style. Bottomline is, when it's a matchup of styles, at lightwt, Duran would be vulnerable to Floyd's speed, movement and counterpunching. Even Leonard wasn't as versatile as Floyd. In a 12 round fight with both fighters at their best, Floyd wins by late KO over the wild, aggressive Duran.
Mayweather-Armstrong. Hammerin' Hank was a great fighter, no doubt. He was perpetual motion and a phenomenon for his era winning titles from feather to welter. He had 18 welterwt defenses. Still, PBF beats hank. It wouldn't be easy, but he'd give hank movement and slip through his own right crosses and left hooks that would keep Hank off-balance. It would be a great fight. But Floyd simply has more snap in his punches. Floyd can drop a guy with one punch. Hank rarely ever did that, relying on constant pressure and the accumulation of punches. Besides, Floyd being faster on his feet would keep Hank on the end of his punches and avoid the infighting that was Armstrongs forte.
Sugar Ray Leonard-Mayweather. The key here is that Leonard was a natural welter while Floyd is still a small welter. Leonard's strength would carry him to win over Floyd, but then again...Leonard had real probs with Benitez, a guy not half as talented as PBF. Leonard didn't fight a lot of fast, technical guys. It would be a thinking man's fight, but speed would carry the day. I see Leonard winning by the narrowest of margins in a fast-paced, exciting fight.
Mayweather-Benny Leonard- OK, so PBF/money would probably take this Leonard out in the first 30 seconds of the fight. It would be a complete mismatch. A guy from the 20's and 30's against a modern fighter. Before Leonard even knew what hit him he'd be out cold.
Robinson- Mayweather. I have PBF winning this at welter. Robinson was a great fighter and far ahead of his time, but he had problems with guys like Kid Gavilan and Johnny Bratton. Kid Gavilan was a great fighter, but not in Floyd's class. Robinson at welter was very fast and very strong, so the early rounds would be difficult for floyd...but down the stretch floyd gets stronger and more comfortable and can improvise. He'd match Robinson's speed and quickness but he'd be better in the inside which was not Robinson's strong point. Also, floyd's use of the ring and superior footwork would keep him always a step ahead over 12 rounds.
-
From High Trujillo
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1
- Joined: 03 Nov 2007, 15:51
Re: 5 Floyd fantasy fights
JajaDiamond WEAPON wrote:You're an idiot...Dentsun4228 wrote:I read with great indignation the thread about PBF-Duran. How anybody in their right mind could put Duran above floyd is beyond me. In case anybody has any questions about where I stand regarding PBF/Money, here's how I think he'd fare against some of the top Lighwts and welters of all time.
Duran-Mayweather. Look, duran lost to a guy named Esteban Dejesus when Duran was this supposedly invincible lightwt champ. Dejesus was no great...he was a good fighter with lateral movement and a decent punch and that's all he needed to drop Duran in the first round and outclass him for 12. In the rematch, Dejesus again dropped Duran in the first round and outboxed him until Duran's pressure got to him (Dejesus also had a serious drug problem even back then). Leonard outboxed duran with ease in fights 2 and 3. I don't think Floyd would try and get into a slugging match with Duran anymore than Cotto will stand and trade with Margarito. It's not his style. Bottomline is, when it's a matchup of styles, at lightwt, Duran would be vulnerable to Floyd's speed, movement and counterpunching. Even Leonard wasn't as versatile as Floyd. In a 12 round fight with both fighters at their best, Floyd wins by late KO over the wild, aggressive Duran.
Mayweather-Armstrong. Hammerin' Hank was a great fighter, no doubt. He was perpetual motion and a phenomenon for his era winning titles from feather to welter. He had 18 welterwt defenses. Still, PBF beats hank. It wouldn't be easy, but he'd give hank movement and slip through his own right crosses and left hooks that would keep Hank off-balance. It would be a great fight. But Floyd simply has more snap in his punches. Floyd can drop a guy with one punch. Hank rarely ever did that, relying on constant pressure and the accumulation of punches. Besides, Floyd being faster on his feet would keep Hank on the end of his punches and avoid the infighting that was Armstrongs forte.
Sugar Ray Leonard-Mayweather. The key here is that Leonard was a natural welter while Floyd is still a small welter. Leonard's strength would carry him to win over Floyd, but then again...Leonard had real probs with Benitez, a guy not half as talented as PBF. Leonard didn't fight a lot of fast, technical guys. It would be a thinking man's fight, but speed would carry the day. I see Leonard winning by the narrowest of margins in a fast-paced, exciting fight.
Mayweather-Benny Leonard- OK, so PBF/money would probably take this Leonard out in the first 30 seconds of the fight. It would be a complete mismatch. A guy from the 20's and 30's against a modern fighter. Before Leonard even knew what hit him he'd be out cold.
Robinson- Mayweather. I have PBF winning this at welter. Robinson was a great fighter and far ahead of his time, but he had problems with guys like Kid Gavilan and Johnny Bratton. Kid Gavilan was a great fighter, but not in Floyd's class. Robinson at welter was very fast and very strong, so the early rounds would be difficult for floyd...but down the stretch floyd gets stronger and more comfortable and can improvise. He'd match Robinson's speed and quickness but he'd be better in the inside which was not Robinson's strong point. Also, floyd's use of the ring and superior footwork would keep him always a step ahead over 12 rounds.
Duran, Leonard, Armstrong and Robinson all kick Floyd's ass... And Benny Leonard doesn't lose that quickly. When you're done trying to give Floyd a blowjob then come back and post you stupid bitch.
-
I came2bring da pain
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1
- Joined: 29 Apr 2008, 04:03
No he probably has a life unlike you.(face) j/k but you do seem pretty despreate to argue with this guy. maybe ya'll should get married and put it up on youtube in black/white with english commentary, and 1 of ya'll look korean but really turn out to be a jap.(just thinking outloud)Broncano wrote:I guess He's still looking for the version where Duran gets his ass handed to him by the no-name Korean who happened to be the Japanese Ishimatsu Suzuki.
-
dajuggernaut
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 441
- Joined: 22 Jul 2006, 22:43
Yee Haw. You said it cowboy.I came2bring da pain wrote:No he probably has a life unlike you.(face) j/k but you do seem pretty despreate to argue with this guy. maybe ya'll should get married and put it up on youtube in black/white with english commentary, and 1 of ya'll look korean but really turn out to be a jap.(just thinking outloud)Broncano wrote:I guess He's still looking for the version where Duran gets his ass handed to him by the no-name Korean who happened to be the Japanese Ishimatsu Suzuki.
-
Raff The Frenchman
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 497
- Joined: 10 Feb 2002, 20:00
I came2bring da pain wrote:No he probably has a life unlike you.(face) j/k but you do seem pretty despreate to argue with this guy. maybe ya'll should get married and put it up on youtube in black/white with english commentary, and 1 of ya'll look korean but really turn out to be a jap.(just thinking outloud)Broncano wrote:I guess He's still looking for the version where Duran gets his ass handed to him by the no-name Korean who happened to be the Japanese Ishimatsu Suzuki.

-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15683
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
Dentsun4228 wrote:First of all, buddy, I'm not in denial about anything...Taylor got knocked out..what's there to be in denial about? The facts are the facts. I just feel he should beat Pavlik in a rematch, providing he whips himself into shape. As for the rest of your post, let me just say this: Some of the guys on these boards are regulars and have 1000, 2000, 8000 plus posts. I have 142. But don't confuse the fact that I don't post here a lot with being ignorant of boxing. Fact is, I have seen the fighters I'm talking about and in a lot of cases the posters who talk about benny leonard this and harry greb that haven't seen them. Did you ever see a tape or fight of Jack Britton or Ted Kid Lewis? If you haven't, you have no right to talk about them, because you don't know what you're talking about. I'm willing to bet that a lot of the guys calling Duran the greatest lightwt ever have never seen a tape of duran at lightwt or maybe never at all. Here's the thing: I've seen tape of many greats from bob fitzsimmons, harry greb, dempsey, jack johnson, benny leonard, gene tunney, mickey walker, barney ross, jimmy mclarnin and the list goes on and on. I have never seen tape of joe gans or some of the other old-timers like mctigue and britton and ted kid lewis. However, based on what I have seen, I can tell you this without a shadow of a doubt. Oldtimers generally sucked. Modern boxers are far better. Don't get me wrong. There were guys like Gavilan and Robinson and armstrong who stood out as great fighters who could possibly compete with the elite of today, but for the most part, today's fighters are far better conditioned, have far better technique and everything. I once heard Ali give a lecture as to why he was better than Marciano and Louis...he pointed out simple things. Things that the casual fan may never see. But everything he pointed out was true. Those guys were so flawed, they'd have problems with some of the amateurs around today. It's because boxing wasn't as advanced as it is today. Think of it this way: The best of the oldtimers were like really smart guys sitting around teaching themselves to read and write. Todays best fighters are like really smart guys who graduate from oxford or the sorbonne. The difference is that great. My point here is: I don't take the legacies of Duran, Robinson, Armstrong etc lightly. I'm just being honest and in some cases I'm being kind. I'm not dissing the oldtimers, after all I rank Ezzard charles and armstrong among the best of their weight class all-time. But putting floyd against robinson or duran or armstrong would be like fighting an alien for those guys. They'd be lost and bewildered and I know that duran would get KO'd. He was dropped by guys like Dejesus who's not even a puncher. He was easily beaten by Leonard and Benitez two guys with styles somewhat similar to floyds. The first fight where leonard stood and traded with duran and fought roberto's fight and lsot by a close margin proves that duran was no monster. Floyd wouldn't trade with him, but he'd certainly take advantage of all of duran's mistakes and take him out.FinitoLopez wrote:Wow. Just wow. I thought okay this is a Taylor fan who is in somewhat denial about the first fight and you know what its not impossible for JT to take the second fight even though this guy is making it sound more one-sided then it would really be. Now I know after hearing your explanations your just batshit insane. You obviously don't take an interest in the sports older generations and look at just the records and hype. It shows because of the Leonard statement. Leonard was KO'ed 4 times in 18 losses when they used much smaller gloves in his time period. Mayweather fights in LV where they force welters to wear 10 oz. I beleive (which is why he won't fight anywhere else). He drew with Ted (kid) Lewis. He almost (had he not been hasty) ko'ed Jack Britton. By the way I'm only stating names I think you'll know. The fact that Duran beat BARKLEY for the WBC middle. championship after destroying everyone even with controversial losses says a lot about him since he was past his prime. How about the fact that Robinson he beat Lamotta, Armstrong, Gavilan, Bobo Olsen, Graziano, and Turpin in a rematch. He even after his prime got Fulmer (with the perfect left hook that would have smashed Hatton and made it so he wouldn't get up for a second one), and was stated by Ali as having been the greatest since Ali clarified that he was only the greatest heavyweight and the greatest p4p was Robinson. Floyd wouldn't match any kind of speed or skill in the ring with Robinson and as for getting comfortable I doubt Floyd has anything that Robinson hadn't already seen. As for Armstrong he beat Barney Ross, beat Feldman for the lightweight and welter title at the same time, and is the very reason Floyd couldn't hold the light middle and welter title (he was so good at those three weight classes it was banned.) Have you ever seen fights of these fighters or even clips. I'm of this generation and I respect and look up to the old fighters.
You have Leonard beating Floyd but he got more controversial decisions in his favor then any of the other fighters above and where Floyd runs 5 miles a day when a fight comes up Leonard ran 10. 15 rounders made these guys have endless stamina. Leonard not as versatile as Floyd. Did you ever see the first Hearns fight and the second Duran fight. Tell me thats not versatile. Or maybe the controversial Hagler fight. He was the most hyped fighter of all that you mentioned and you give him the most praise. Now Mayweather is. I don't usually talk bad about others on this forum but please watch their fights and learn a few things about boxing.
Everybody got their own opinions...Some are very LUDICRUOS like this one.
-
elmersalsa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 15683
- Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50
ha ha ha ha ha, I am having the laugh of my life in this forum...LOL, I am dying of pure laughs.Broncano wrote:And you are so knowledegable about Duran's career that you can't even remember this Korean's name who was allegedly beating him?
And before you run to the database and check Duran's record, lety me save you the time: He never fought any Korean
Broncano, thanks.
-
Smokin'Moe
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 60
- Joined: 22 Jan 2008, 17:08
Re:
FinitoLopez wrote:Wow. Just wow. I thought okay this is a Taylor fan who is in somewhat denial about the first fight and you know what its not impossible for JT to take the second fight even though this guy is making it sound more one-sided then it would really be. Now I know after hearing your explanations your just batshit insane. You obviously don't take an interest in the sports older generations and look at just the records and hype. It shows because of the Leonard statement. Leonard was KO'ed 4 times in 18 losses when they used much smaller gloves in his time period. Mayweather fights in LV where they force welters to wear 10 oz. I beleive (which is why he won't fight anywhere else). He drew with Ted (kid) Lewis. He almost (had he not been hasty) ko'ed Jack Britton. By the way I'm only stating names I think you'll know. The fact that Duran beat BARKLEY for the WBC middle. championship after destroying everyone even with controversial losses says a lot about him since he was past his prime. How about the fact that Robinson he beat Lamotta, Armstrong, Gavilan, Bobo Olsen, Graziano, and Turpin in a rematch. He even after his prime got Fulmer (with the perfect left hook that would have smashed Hatton and made it so he wouldn't get up for a second one), and was stated by Ali as having been the greatest since Ali clarified that he was only the greatest heavyweight and the greatest p4p was Robinson. Floyd wouldn't match any kind of speed or skill in the ring with Robinson and as for getting comfortable I doubt Floyd has anything that Robinson hadn't already seen. As for Armstrong he beat Barney Ross, beat Feldman for the lightweight and welter title at the same time, and is the very reason Floyd couldn't hold the light middle and welter title (he was so good at those three weight classes it was banned.) Have you ever seen fights of these fighters or even clips. I'm of this generation and I respect and look up to the old fighters.
You have Leonard beating Floyd but he got more controversial decisions in his favor then any of the other fighters above and where Floyd runs 5 miles a day when a fight comes up Leonard ran 10. 15 rounders made these guys have endless stamina. Leonard not as versatile as Floyd. Did you ever see the first Hearns fight and the second Duran fight. Tell me thats not versatile. Or maybe the controversial Hagler fight. He was the most hyped fighter of all that you mentioned and you give him the most praise. Now Mayweather is. I don't usually talk bad about others on this forum but please watch their fights and learn a few things about boxing.
This post is right on. Dentsun, how many Robinson fights have you seen that have allowed you to discredit him so much? How would the smaller, less skilled Floyd do anything to Sugar Ray? you gotta look past "money" mayweathers hype.
-
Smokin'Moe
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 60
- Joined: 22 Jan 2008, 17:08
Re: 5 Floyd fantasy fights
to say todays fighters are more skilled and are in better shape than the older fighters is pure ignorance. how can 12 rounds compete with 15, or 20, or 50 for that matter!!
-
dempseyfire
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5534
- Joined: 29 Oct 2003, 22:56
Re: 5 Floyd fantasy fights
Floyd loses to all of them, period.