DOES TAK HAVE MORE THAN PUNCHERS CHANCE AGAINST SMALL?
DOES TAK HAVE MORE THAN PUNCHERS CHANCE AGAINST SMALL?
Surely if Small boxes as he can he wins this but Tak can still bang I guess therefore you can't rule him out.
Even at this stage of careers surely this is a crossroads fight for both men, Tak cannot come back if he loses here I think. For Small it would be a long road back if he don't get the W.
Intriguing kind of fight, even more so with Mitchell/Johanneson off the card, what do you guys think
Even at this stage of careers surely this is a crossroads fight for both men, Tak cannot come back if he loses here I think. For Small it would be a long road back if he don't get the W.
Intriguing kind of fight, even more so with Mitchell/Johanneson off the card, what do you guys think
Re: DOES TAK HAVE MORE THAN PUNCHERS CHANCE AGAINST SMALL?
Small got stopped on his feet by Pryce and it was a bit premature for me.GLOBALBOX wrote:Surely if Small boxes as he can he wins this but Tak can still bang I guess therefore you can't rule him out.
Even at this stage of careers surely this is a crossroads fight for both men, Tak cannot come back if he loses here I think. For Small it would be a long road back if he don't get the W.
Intriguing kind of fight, even more so with Mitchell/Johanneson off the card, what do you guys think
Small was good in spurts and he was giving Bradley some trouble with his speed.
Small KO3 Tak
-
TerribleTerry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30
Re: DOES TAK HAVE MORE THAN PUNCHERS CHANCE AGAINST SMALL?
It might have been slightly premature but could you see Small turning it around from that point? I couldn't.KO Artist wrote: Small got stopped on his feet by Pryce and it was a bit premature for me.
Would like to see Tak wipe out Small and send him back to the drawing board.
SRCJJ? Dont make me laugh.
Re: DOES TAK HAVE MORE THAN PUNCHERS CHANCE AGAINST SMALL?
Seconded on all counts.TerribleTerry wrote:It might have been slightly premature but could you see Small turning it around from that point? I couldn't.KO Artist wrote: Small got stopped on his feet by Pryce and it was a bit premature for me.
Would like to see Tak wipe out Small and send him back to the drawing board.
SRCJJ? Dont make me laugh.
-
Eraserhead
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 554
- Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 18:46
-
E
- Heavyweight

Re: DOES TAK HAVE MORE THAN PUNCHERS CHANCE AGAINST SMALL?
Don't agree stoppage was premature - SMall's legs were gone. Watch him stagger around after the stoppage.TerribleTerry wrote:It might have been slightly premature but could you see Small turning it around from that point? I couldn't.KO Artist wrote: Small got stopped on his feet by Pryce and it was a bit premature for me.
Would like to see Tak wipe out Small and send him back to the drawing board.
SRCJJ? Dont make me laugh.
But this is a v interesting fight. Not sure at all about the outcome.
-
Old bones Ian
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 11806
- Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33
Stoppage against Pryce wasn't premature, Small was a couple of punches away from being KO'd , the ref did him a favour.
Small was blowing out his ass after 5 rounds against Pryce, will be interesting to see if he will do the same against Tak.
If he does than Tak can break him down for a stoppage around the 8th.
If he has got his stamina sorted then he can win.
Small was blowing out his ass after 5 rounds against Pryce, will be interesting to see if he will do the same against Tak.
If he does than Tak can break him down for a stoppage around the 8th.
If he has got his stamina sorted then he can win.
Former world title challenger Takaloo picks up the pieces at 32 against flashy Londoner Anthony Small for the vacant Southern Area light-middleweight title at York Hall next Saturday.
Small, six years younger, also looks to get back on track.
Takaloo challenged Daniel Santos for the WBO light-middleweight title back in 2002 and was outscored over 12 bloody rounds, despite dropping the tasty Puerto Rican. He was down himself from a brutal Wayne Alexander left hook a few years later, and they could have counted to a 100. His recent stint at welterweight proved just as mixed: he outscored Belfast's cagey Eamonn Magee but dropped a narrow decision to Chorley star Michael Jennings in Cardiff nine months ago in his last outing.
Still, his fight with Jennings (and Tony Doherty's patient destruction of a brave Taz Jones) proved the highlight of a long Millennium Stadium night topped by Joe Calzaghe against Pete Manfredo and looked much, much closer from ringside than it did on TV. "Lurcher" Jennings moved around, potshotted but failed to 'sit down' on his punches (which cost him against Young Muttley) and Tak worked hard all the way through 12 absorbing rounds, particularly to the body. Much of his body work made you wince in fact and scores of 115-114 and 115-113 looked about right, although inevitably one judge was way off at 117-111 (all scores for Jennings).
So the Margate puncher hardly looks 'shot' after 10 years as a pro, especially back up at light-middleweight where he's blown away the likes of Scott Dixon, Jim Rock and a previously unbeaten Anthony Farnell - he's taken out 17 of his 25 beaten opponents.
Small, a pro only three years, concedes masses of experience but bemuses his opponents (in and out of the ring) with shots from unusual angles and plenty of brashness. Unbeaten in his first 17, he stepped up against Welsh renaissance man Bradley Pryce in his last outing in the summer and faded after a bright start and was stopped in seven. Pryce proved too seasoned, but Small also faded against American Walter "Two Guns" Wright in Newcastle last March and staggered home in the eighth and last round to a split decision. So the man self-nicknamed "SugarRayClayJonesJunior" hardly fights as well as he talks and was labelled a "maverick" in training by coach Spencer Fearon, although he showed real guts against Wright and will undoubtedly have learned from the Pryce experience.
He does have talent.
It's well known in the trade Takaloo doesn't like 'movers', so expect Small to get on his bike and fight in much the same way Jennings did, only with more snap on his punches. Takaloo has a shout, of course, but one has to fancy the fresher Small, unless he fades alarmingly, to come through.
Small, six years younger, also looks to get back on track.
Takaloo challenged Daniel Santos for the WBO light-middleweight title back in 2002 and was outscored over 12 bloody rounds, despite dropping the tasty Puerto Rican. He was down himself from a brutal Wayne Alexander left hook a few years later, and they could have counted to a 100. His recent stint at welterweight proved just as mixed: he outscored Belfast's cagey Eamonn Magee but dropped a narrow decision to Chorley star Michael Jennings in Cardiff nine months ago in his last outing.
Still, his fight with Jennings (and Tony Doherty's patient destruction of a brave Taz Jones) proved the highlight of a long Millennium Stadium night topped by Joe Calzaghe against Pete Manfredo and looked much, much closer from ringside than it did on TV. "Lurcher" Jennings moved around, potshotted but failed to 'sit down' on his punches (which cost him against Young Muttley) and Tak worked hard all the way through 12 absorbing rounds, particularly to the body. Much of his body work made you wince in fact and scores of 115-114 and 115-113 looked about right, although inevitably one judge was way off at 117-111 (all scores for Jennings).
So the Margate puncher hardly looks 'shot' after 10 years as a pro, especially back up at light-middleweight where he's blown away the likes of Scott Dixon, Jim Rock and a previously unbeaten Anthony Farnell - he's taken out 17 of his 25 beaten opponents.
Small, a pro only three years, concedes masses of experience but bemuses his opponents (in and out of the ring) with shots from unusual angles and plenty of brashness. Unbeaten in his first 17, he stepped up against Welsh renaissance man Bradley Pryce in his last outing in the summer and faded after a bright start and was stopped in seven. Pryce proved too seasoned, but Small also faded against American Walter "Two Guns" Wright in Newcastle last March and staggered home in the eighth and last round to a split decision. So the man self-nicknamed "SugarRayClayJonesJunior" hardly fights as well as he talks and was labelled a "maverick" in training by coach Spencer Fearon, although he showed real guts against Wright and will undoubtedly have learned from the Pryce experience.
He does have talent.
It's well known in the trade Takaloo doesn't like 'movers', so expect Small to get on his bike and fight in much the same way Jennings did, only with more snap on his punches. Takaloo has a shout, of course, but one has to fancy the fresher Small, unless he fades alarmingly, to come through.
-
Old bones Ian
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 11806
- Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33
Re: DOES TAK HAVE MORE THAN PUNCHERS CHANCE AGAINST SMALL?
I dont know Anthony personally, but I ahve met him a couple of times informally. He is a nice genuine fella. And a fcukong good fighter tooTerribleTerry wrote:It might have been slightly premature but could you see Small turning it around from that point? I couldn't.KO Artist wrote: Small got stopped on his feet by Pryce and it was a bit premature for me.
Would like to see Tak wipe out Small and send him back to the drawing board.
SRCJJ? Dont make me laugh.
My brother trained with him for a bit and concurs that he is a genuine man with great skill
Dont hate the public figure
Come on Ant.
-
Dirk Kelly
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4971
- Joined: 06 Jul 2004, 20:13
Re: DOES TAK HAVE MORE THAN PUNCHERS CHANCE AGAINST SMALL?
Top postGLOBALBOX wrote:Surely if Small boxes as he can he wins this but Tak can still bang I guess therefore you can't rule him out.
Even at this stage of careers surely this is a crossroads fight for both men, Tak cannot come back if he loses here I think. For Small it would be a long road back if he don't get the W.
Intriguing kind of fight, even more so with Mitchell/Johanneson off the card, what do you guys think
-
Dirk Kelly
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4971
- Joined: 06 Jul 2004, 20:13
Re: DOES TAK HAVE MORE THAN PUNCHERS CHANCE AGAINST SMALL?
Top postGLOBALBOX wrote:Surely if Small boxes as he can he wins this but Tak can still bang I guess therefore you can't rule him out.
Even at this stage of careers surely this is a crossroads fight for both men, Tak cannot come back if he loses here I think. For Small it would be a long road back if he don't get the W.
Intriguing kind of fight, even more so with Mitchell/Johanneson off the card, what do you guys think
-
Dirk Kelly
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 4971
- Joined: 06 Jul 2004, 20:13
I think this fight boils down to two things - how much does Tak have left in the tank and how much has Small learned from the Pyrce fight.
If Small doesn't pace himself and Tak is happy to do what Pryce did and allow himself to be backed up, parrying shots then I fancy a Tak win from the middle rounds. But if Small has learned, almost like Haye to pace himself, pick his shots, don't go head hunting then I fancy a Small victory in the late rounds.
If Tak has nothing left, moving to the verve of journeyman, then I fancy a Small blitz almost like Khan vs. Earl.
If Small doesn't pace himself and Tak is happy to do what Pryce did and allow himself to be backed up, parrying shots then I fancy a Tak win from the middle rounds. But if Small has learned, almost like Haye to pace himself, pick his shots, don't go head hunting then I fancy a Small victory in the late rounds.
If Tak has nothing left, moving to the verve of journeyman, then I fancy a Small blitz almost like Khan vs. Earl.
Dirk Kelly wrote:I think this fight boils down to two things - how much does Tak have left in the tank and how much has Small learned from the Pyrce fight.
If Small doesn't pace himself and Tak is happy to do what Pryce did and allow himself to be backed up, parrying shots then I fancy a Tak win from the middle rounds. But if Small has learned, almost like Haye to pace himself, pick his shots, don't go head hunting then I fancy a Small victory in the late rounds.
If Tak has nothing left, moving to the verve of journeyman, then I fancy a Small blitz almost like Khan vs. Earl.
I just get the feeling we will see a domestic version of Curry v McCrory, with Mr Anthony Small as the Cobra
I nearly always seem to pick Tak in these close call fights and nearly always he loses... Jennings, Alexander etc. He looked like he had nothing left vs Jennings - but stylewise I think he has a shout vs Small. Tak still has a very decent chin.
My call will be based on the tall of the tape - who has the Height and reach advantage.... I aint sure of the top of my head. Whoever has it, is my pick.
If small has to work inside (if he is smaller) then I suspect Tak will find the punch... if Small is bigger, then I expect him to box his way to a comfortable decision win.
My call will be based on the tall of the tape - who has the Height and reach advantage.... I aint sure of the top of my head. Whoever has it, is my pick.
If small has to work inside (if he is smaller) then I suspect Tak will find the punch... if Small is bigger, then I expect him to box his way to a comfortable decision win.
Its not just the tale of the tape Stu. In terms of reach its not Darts. Small can get in with his feet behind the jab and throw any kind of punch off it and get out.stujones wrote:I nearly always seem to pick Tak in these close call fights and nearly always he loses... Jennings, Alexander etc. He looked like he had nothing left vs Jennings - but stylewise I think he has a shout vs Small. Tak still has a very decent chin.
My call will be based on the tall of the tape - who has the Height and reach advantage.... I aint sure of the top of my head. Whoever has it, is my pick.
If small has to work inside (if he is smaller) then I suspect Tak will find the punch... if Small is bigger, then I expect him to box his way to a comfortable decision win.
When you have a big edge in speed, reach is not a big factor.
Just look at Tyson. Even Foster Junior proved that against AAA. His overhand right was like a radar. I bet he has been nailing people with that since he was a kid.
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13114
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
-
Rocky Balboa
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1851
- Joined: 24 Jan 2004, 16:38
For me, Small should win. After losing to Pryce last time out, I reckon Small will be highly motivated to win, & win impressively. An impressive win is the only way to help Anthony get back into the mix.
I trained with Anthony when he was at Fitzroy Lodge. I can honestly say, that from my point of view, Anthony is a nice guy, geuine person. Not the flashy, brash & arrogant person the general public think he is.
All the flashiness, it's just playing to the crowd, for entertainment value. I must admit, that some of the things Small says sometimes I don't agree with, but what person do any of us agree with or like all the time. We can't please everyone all of the time.
Basically, it's now or never for Small. I expect to win. His speed & movement will be too much for Takaloo in my view.
I trained with Anthony when he was at Fitzroy Lodge. I can honestly say, that from my point of view, Anthony is a nice guy, geuine person. Not the flashy, brash & arrogant person the general public think he is.
All the flashiness, it's just playing to the crowd, for entertainment value. I must admit, that some of the things Small says sometimes I don't agree with, but what person do any of us agree with or like all the time. We can't please everyone all of the time.
Basically, it's now or never for Small. I expect to win. His speed & movement will be too much for Takaloo in my view.