Your comment implied that he is hideously over rated in general. He isn't.Horse wrote:By saying things like he will "annihilate Arthur inside 2 to 3 rounds".TerribleTerry wrote:His dig might be over rated but his skills are elite world class.Horse wrote:Guzman is hideously overated.
How can you over rate someone who is as good as Guzman??.
Guzman v Arthur
-
TerribleTerry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30
I believe he is over rated because people say he is far better than I believe he is.TerribleTerry wrote:Your comment implied that he is hideously over rated in general. He isn't.Horse wrote:By saying things like he will "annihilate Arthur inside 2 to 3 rounds".TerribleTerry wrote: His dig might be over rated but his skills are elite world class.
How can you over rate someone who is as good as Guzman??.
He is obviously very good but people make out he is superman.
-
TerribleTerry
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5272
- Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 12:30
Fair enough - time will tell I suppose!Horse wrote:I believe he is over rated because people say he is far better than I believe he is.TerribleTerry wrote:Your comment implied that he is hideously over rated in general. He isn't.Horse wrote: By saying things like he will "annihilate Arthur inside 2 to 3 rounds".
He is obviously very good but people make out he is superman.
He recently comprehensively beat Soto who, many thought, was one of the elite at 130.glahn wrote:I think he's overrated in general. He has good handspeed and some skill, but he's also quite lazy and lacks punching power. He's good but I wouldn't give him much of a chance against the elite of the two divisions he's looking to fight in.